[Treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration: Consensus of French experts for first-line treatment selection and the importance of long-term risk/benefit ratio].
Consensus d’experts français sur les critères de choix d’un traitement de 1
Age-related macular degeneration
Consensus
Critères de choix
Delphi
Dégénérescence maculaire liée à l’âge
Efficacité
Efficacy
Espacement
Extend
First-line
Interval
Intervalle
Première intention
Safety
Tolérance
Traitement
Treatment
Treatment selection
Journal
Journal francais d'ophtalmologie
ISSN: 1773-0597
Titre abrégé: J Fr Ophtalmol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 7804128
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
15
01
2021
accepted:
28
01
2021
pubmed:
21
6
2021
medline:
3
9
2021
entrez:
20
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Choosing a first-line treatment to optimize long-term outcomes is a major challenge for treating patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The development of several new molecules makes it critical to identify the relevant factors to consider so as to provide an optimal risk-benefit ratio when initiating a treatment in naïve patients with neovascular AMD. This paper proposes a consensus established with the Delphi method (which includes a gradation in a consensus based on an analysis of the convergence rate of answers) to provide criteria that guide the ophthalmologist's decision for treatment initiation and follow-up in neovascular AMD patients. Fourteen questions were submitted to 93 French retina experts. Thirteen (93%) of the questions reached a consensus (≥50% of answers consensual). The criteria recommended to take into account were both efficacy and onset of action of the molecules, their safety, and the ability to decrease injection frequency. The primary criterion of expected efficacy of a molecule is a combination of the gain in visual acuity and resorption of retinal fluid. With regard to safety, experts recommend tighter follow-up for molecules currently in development, and at every scheduled visit, patients should be screened to identify early any potential adverse effects such as intraocular inflammation, retinal vasculitis or vascular occlusion. Experts also emphasize the importance of the packaging of the biological, with a preference toward prefilled syringes. Injection frequency is a key factor, and the authors recommended aiming for a maximal injection interval of 12 to 16 weeks. The stability of that maximum interval is also an important factor to consider in treatment selection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34147276
pii: S0181-5512(21)00249-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2021.01.001
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
fre
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
937-946Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.