[Treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration: Consensus of French experts for first-line treatment selection and the importance of long-term risk/benefit ratio].

Consensus d’experts français sur les critères de choix d’un traitement de 1
Age-related macular degeneration Consensus Critères de choix Delphi Dégénérescence maculaire liée à l’âge Efficacité Efficacy Espacement Extend First-line Interval Intervalle Première intention Safety Tolérance Traitement Treatment Treatment selection

Journal

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie
ISSN: 1773-0597
Titre abrégé: J Fr Ophtalmol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 7804128

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Historique:
received: 15 01 2021
accepted: 28 01 2021
pubmed: 21 6 2021
medline: 3 9 2021
entrez: 20 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Choosing a first-line treatment to optimize long-term outcomes is a major challenge for treating patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The development of several new molecules makes it critical to identify the relevant factors to consider so as to provide an optimal risk-benefit ratio when initiating a treatment in naïve patients with neovascular AMD. This paper proposes a consensus established with the Delphi method (which includes a gradation in a consensus based on an analysis of the convergence rate of answers) to provide criteria that guide the ophthalmologist's decision for treatment initiation and follow-up in neovascular AMD patients. Fourteen questions were submitted to 93 French retina experts. Thirteen (93%) of the questions reached a consensus (≥50% of answers consensual). The criteria recommended to take into account were both efficacy and onset of action of the molecules, their safety, and the ability to decrease injection frequency. The primary criterion of expected efficacy of a molecule is a combination of the gain in visual acuity and resorption of retinal fluid. With regard to safety, experts recommend tighter follow-up for molecules currently in development, and at every scheduled visit, patients should be screened to identify early any potential adverse effects such as intraocular inflammation, retinal vasculitis or vascular occlusion. Experts also emphasize the importance of the packaging of the biological, with a preference toward prefilled syringes. Injection frequency is a key factor, and the authors recommended aiming for a maximal injection interval of 12 to 16 weeks. The stability of that maximum interval is also an important factor to consider in treatment selection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34147276
pii: S0181-5512(21)00249-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2021.01.001
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Angiogenesis Inhibitors 0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

fre

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

937-946

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Auteurs

A Couturier (A)

Université de Paris, service d'ophtalmologie, assistance publique hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.

L Kodjikian (L)

Service d'ophtalmologie, hôpital universitaire Croix-Rousse, hospices Civils de Lyon, université Lyon I, Lyon, France; CNRS UMR 5510 Mateis, Villeurbanne, France.

S Baillif (S)

Service d'ophtalmologie, hôpital universitaire Pasteur 2, université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

J-B Conart (JB)

Service d'ophtalmologie, CHRU Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de la Vision, Inserm, UMR_S 968, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.

C Dot (C)

Service d'ophtalmologie, hôpital d'instruction des Armées Desgenettes, 69003 Lyon, France; École du Val de Grâce, Paris, France.

M-N Delyfer (MN)

Service d'ophtalmologie, centre hospitalier universitaire de Bordeaux, université de Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux population health research centre, team LEHA, UMR 1219, 33000 Bordeaux, France.

F Matonti (F)

Centre Monticelli Paradis, Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, INT, Inst Neurosci Timone, 433, bis rue Paradis, 13008 Marseille, France.

V Caillaux (V)

Centre explore vision Paris, Rueil Malmaison, France; Service d'ophtalmologie, assistance publique hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.

E Bousquet (E)

OphtalmoPôle de Paris, hôpital Cochin, assistance publique hôpitaux de Paris, université de Paris, Paris, France.

A Robinet (A)

Centre ophtalmologique ophtasiam, clinique Pasteur-Lanrose, Brest, France.

H Massé (H)

Service d'ophtalmologie, centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.

J Uzzan (J)

Clinique Mathilde, Rouen, France.

S Mrejen (S)

Centre d'Imagerie et de Laser, Paris, France.

O Semoun (O)

Service d'ophtalmologie, centre hospitalier intercommunal de Créteil, université Paris Est Créteil, 40, avenue de Verdun, 94000 Créteil, France; Centre ophtalmologique du Panthéon, Paris, France. Electronic address: oudysemoun@hotmail.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH