Outcome of Endovascular Therapy Aiming for Single-session Obliteration of Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas.
dural arteriovenous fistula
embolization
endovascular
radiation
session
Journal
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
ISSN: 1349-8029
Titre abrégé: Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 0400775
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Oct 2021
15 Oct 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
22
6
2021
medline:
29
10
2021
entrez:
21
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The goal of dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVF) treatment is obliteration of the arteriovenous shunt and/or retrograde leptomeningeal venous drainage (RLVD). Single-session obliteration could improve symptoms early and reduce risk of neurological sequelae. This study investigated the efficacy and adverse events of endovascular therapy (EVT) aiming for single-session obliteration in dAVF treatment. We retrospectively examined post-treatment arteriovenous shunt status, number of treatments per case, treatment-related complications, and long-term outcome in 92 dAVF patients who underwent initial EVT at our institution. Single-session obliteration was intended in all cases, but a second session was performed in cases of partial shunt occlusion or remaining RLVD. Complete occlusion was achieved in 85 cases (92.4%) after the single session; RLVD was obliterated in 66 of the 67 Borden type II and III cases combined (98.5%). A second session was necessary in seven cases (7.6%). Complete shunt obliteration was eventually achieved in all cases. The average number of treatments was 1.08 per case. dAVF-related stroke and mortality did not occur after the treatment. On the other hand, radiation-induced skin erythema and alopecia, although all symptoms were transient, occurred in 26 cases (28.3%). Over an average 60.2-month follow-up period, recurrence was observed in seven cases (7.6%). Single-session obliteration was successful in 92% of cases. Especially, single-session obliteration of RLVD may contribute to early prevent of future stroke events. However, reducing total radiation dose during each session is an issue of further study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34148944
doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2021-0059
pmc: PMC8531874
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
563-569Références
J Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;124(4):1123-7
pubmed: 26406789
Radiographics. 2004 Nov-Dec;24(6):1637-53
pubmed: 15537974
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jan;13(1):59-66
pubmed: 24290159
J Neurosurg. 1995 Feb;82(2):166-79
pubmed: 7815143
Stroke. 2002 May;33(5):1233-6
pubmed: 11988596
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Nov;29(10):1910-7
pubmed: 18719037
Neurosurg Rev. 2014 Jan;37(1):63-71
pubmed: 24101196
Interv Neuroradiol. 2016 Apr;22(2):212-6
pubmed: 26748082
Radiology. 1995 Mar;194(3):671-80
pubmed: 7862961
J Neurosurg. 2008 Aug;109(2):208-14
pubmed: 18671631
Neurosurgery. 2012 Sep;71(3):594-602; discussion 602-3
pubmed: 22610384
Interv Neuroradiol. 1997 Dec 20;3(4):303-11
pubmed: 20678361
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Feb;29(2):235-41
pubmed: 17989374
Neurosurgery. 2013 Sep;73(1 Suppl Operative):ons100-5
pubmed: 23538401
Stroke. 2010 Jul;41(7):1489-94
pubmed: 20522815
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):742-8
pubmed: 24768364
Lancet. 2014 Feb 15;383(9917):614-21
pubmed: 24268105
Prog Neurol Surg. 2007;20:16-27
pubmed: 17317973
J Neurointerv Surg. 2014 Oct;6(8):607-13
pubmed: 24062253
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Aug;31(7):1216-21
pubmed: 20299427
Neurosurgery. 1997 Jun;40(6):1119-30; discussion 1130-2
pubmed: 9179884
J Neurosurg. 2012 Sep;117(3):539-45
pubmed: 22725983
J Neurointerv Surg. 2013 Jul;5(4):306-10
pubmed: 22550096
Ann ICRP. 2000;30(2):7-67
pubmed: 11459599