Nursing knowledge on skin ulcer healing: a living scoping review protocol.
Journal
JBI evidence synthesis
ISSN: 2689-8381
Titre abrégé: JBI Evid Synth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101764819
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 01 2022
01 01 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
22
6
2021
medline:
2
2
2022
entrez:
21
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This review aims to continuously map the nursing knowledge on skin ulcer healing in any context of care. Chronic wounds are an increasing concern for society and health care providers. Pressure ulcers and venous ulcers, among others, have devastating effects on morbidity and quality of life and require a systematic approach. The nursing process is an important method that allows a better organization and overall care quality for a systematic and continuous professional approach to nursing management of skin ulcers. The integration of this nursing knowledge in informatics systems creates an opportunity to embed decision-support models in clinical activity, promoting evidence-based practice. This scoping review will consider articles on nursing data, diagnosis, interventions, and outcomes focused on people with skin ulcers in all contexts of care. This review will include quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods study designs as well as systematic reviews and dissertations. JBI's scoping review guidance, as well as the Cochrane Collaboration's guidance on living reviews, will be followed to meet the review's objective. Screening of new literature will be performed regularly, with the review updated according to new findings. The search strategy will map published and unpublished studies. The databases to be searched include MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, JBI Evidence Synthesis, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PEDro. Searches for unpublished studies will include OpenGrey and Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal. Studies published in English and Portuguese since 2010 will be considered for inclusion. Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/f6s4e/.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34149023
doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00512
pii: 02174543-202201000-00007
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
164-172Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 JBI.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Lindholm C, Searle R. Wound management for the 21st century: combining effectiveness and efficiency. Int Wound J 2016;13:5–15.
Kapp S, Santamaria N. The financial and quality-of-life cost to patients living with a chronic wound in the community. Int Wound J 2017;14 (6):1108–1119.
Morton LM, Phillips TJ. Wound healing and treating wounds: differential diagnosis and evaluation of chronic wounds. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016;74 (4):589–605.
WOCN Task Force. Wound, ostomy, and continence nursing: scope and standards of WOC practice; 2nd ed: an executive summary. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2018;45 (4):369–387.
Gupta S, Andersen C, Black J, Fife C, Lantis JI, Niezgoda J, et al. Management of chronic wounds: diagnosis, preparation, treatment, and follow-up. Wounds 2017;29 (9):S19–S36.
Carvalho Oliveira I, Célia Sales Santos Veríssimo R, Lysete de Assis Bastos M, Martins Leite Lúcio I. [The frequency of nursing diagnoses in patients with wounds]. Rev de Enferm 2014;8 (7): Portuguese.
Augustin M, Mayer A, Heyer K, Storck M, Debus E. Power through standards: The Federal Conference for Outcome Measurement and Benefit Assessment of Chronic Wounds. Phlebologie 2016;45 (02):81–84.
Ribeiro O, MMFPS M, Tronchin D, Forte E. Implementation of the nursing process in Portuguese hospitals. Rev Gaúcha Enferm 2018;39 (e2017):e2017–e2174.
International Organization for Standardization. Health informatics - detailed clinical models, characteristics and processes (ISO/TS 13972:2015) [internet]. 2015 [cited 2018 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/62416.html.
International Organization for Standardization. Health informatics — categorial structures for representation of nursing diagnoses and nursing actions in terminological systems (ISO 18104:2014) [internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/59431.html.
Ennis WJ, Hoffman RA, Gurtner GC, Kirsner RS, Gordon HM. Wound healing outcomes: using big data and a modified intent-to-treat method as a metric for reporting healing rates. Wound Rep Regen 2017;25 (4):665–672.
Dowsett C, Hall Y. TIME to improve patient outcomes: optimising wound care through a clinical decision support tool. Br J Nurs 2019;28 (6):S17–S21.
Jordan S, McSwiggan J, Parker J, Halas GA, Friesen M. An mHealth App for decision-making support in wound dressing selection (wounDS): protocol for a user-centered feasibility study. JMIR Res Protoc 2018;7 (4):e108.
Han G, Ceilley R. Chronic wound healing: a review of current management and treatments. Adv Ther 2017;34 (3):599–610.
Dabiri G, Damstetter E, Phillips T. Choosing a wound dressing based on common wound characteristics. Adv Wound Care 2016;5 (1):32–41.
Ordem dos Enfermeiros. [Ordem advances to improve Nursing Information Systems] [internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jan 22]. Available from: https://www.ordemenfermeiros.pt/noticias/conteudos/ordem-avan%C3%A7a-para-a-melhoria-dos-sistemas-de-informa%C3%A7%C3%A3o-em-enfermagem/. Portuguese.
Neves H, Parente P. A nursing clinical data model for neuromuscular processes: content analysis of the Portuguese nursing customization. Cien Saude Colet 2019;24:1609–1616.
Gonçalves PDB, Sampaio FMC, Sequeira CAC, Paiva e Silva MATC. Data, diagnoses, and interventions addressing the nursing focus “delusion”: a scoping review. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2020;56 (1):175–187.
Queirós C, Silva MATCP, Cruz I, Cardoso A, Morais EJ. Nursing diagnoses focused on universal self-care requisites. Int Nurs Rev 2021; Epub ahead of print.
HIMSS Publishing, Pereira F, Paiva A. Weaver C, Delaney C, Weber P, Carr R. Information technology and nursing practice: the Portuguese case. Nursing and informatics for the 21st century: an international look at practice, education and EHR trends 2nd ed2016; 435–441.
Banning M. Clinical reasoning and its application to nursing: concepts and research studies. Nurse Educ Pract 2008;8 (3):177–183.
Brooker J, Synnot A, McDonald S, Elliott J, Turner T, Hodder R, et al. Guidance for the production and publication of Cochrane living systematic reviews: Cochrane Reviews in living mode [internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Oct 22]. Available from: https://community.cochrane.org/sites/default/files/uploads/inline-files/Transform/201912_LSR_Revised_Guidance.pdf
Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Trico A, Khalil H. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [internet]. Adelaide: JBI; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 21]. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.
Khalil H, Peters M, Godfrey CM, McInerney P, Soares CB, Parker D. An evidence-based approach to scoping reviews. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2016;13 (2):118–123.
McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2016;75:40–46.
Tricco AC, Lachance CC, Rios P, Darvesh N, Antony J, Radhakrishnan A, et al. Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol. JBI Evid Synth 2020;18 (10):2181–2193.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018;169 (7):467–473.
Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 2010;5:69.
International Council of Nurses. ICNP browser [internet]. Geneva: International Council of Nurses; 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 22]. Available from: https://www.icn.ch/what-we-do/projects/ehealth/icnp-browser.