Evaluation of iron and manganese removal effectiveness by treatment plant modules based on water pollution index; a comprehensive approach.
Iron
Manganese
Mazandaran
WPI
Water
Journal
Journal of environmental health science & engineering
ISSN: 2052-336X
Titre abrégé: J Environ Health Sci Eng
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101613643
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
06
02
2021
accepted:
05
04
2021
entrez:
21
6
2021
pubmed:
22
6
2021
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Groundwater is a viable alternative when access to surface water resources is limited. Iron and manganese are known ions in soil and naturally in groundwater sources. However, human activities also are responsible. To identifying the best module for removing manganese and iron in the water treatment plant (WTP) of Mazandaran, 516 samples were taken from raw and treated water. The concentration of manganese, iron, was measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry, and turbidity was used with the nephelometry method. The water pollution index (WPI) was applied for categorizing the status of pollution in treated water. The effect of seasonal temperature and backwashing (At flow rates of 3.5, 9.2, and 15.3 m h-1) on the sand filter efficiency was also investigated. The highest concentrations of manganese, iron, and turbidity in raw water were 0.744, 6.70 mg L-1, and 41.8 NTU, and in treated water were 0.67, 1.09 mg L-1, and 5.58 NTU, respectively. The mean concentration of manganese and iron in raw and treated water were 0.24 ± 0.1, 0.93 ± 0.91, 0.105 ± 0.06 and 0.18 ± 0.14 mg L-1 respectively. The WPI statuses in drinking water were excellent for manganese and iron in 95.74 and 53.88 % of the samples and very poor in 1.16 and 12.01 % of the samples, respectively, and its classification for drinking water for manganese and iron was excellent ˃ good ˃ extremely polluted ˃ polluted and the concentration of iron was more than manganese in treated water. The study of temperature's effect on sand filters showed that the removal efficiency in warm seasons was higher than in cold seasons. Also, the turbulence in the backwash with the 9.2 m h
Identifiants
pubmed: 34150288
doi: 10.1007/s40201-021-00665-2
pii: 665
pmc: PMC8172764
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1005-1013Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interestThe authors of this study explain that there is no conflict of interest with each other.
Références
Water Sci Technol. 2008;57(9):1461-6
pubmed: 18496013
Food Chem Toxicol. 2018 May;115:436-446
pubmed: 29621578
Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019 Jul;190(1):251-261
pubmed: 30225757
Neuromolecular Med. 2009;11(4):252-66
pubmed: 19657747
Water Res. 2004 Mar;38(5):1259-69
pubmed: 14975659
Data Brief. 2017 Nov 01;15:901-907
pubmed: 29159228
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2021 Jan;80(1):31-40
pubmed: 33388839
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Jun 15;42(12):4261-7
pubmed: 18605542
Data Brief. 2017 Dec 06;16:724-731
pubmed: 29270455
J Environ Manage. 2019 Nov 1;249:109381
pubmed: 31419670