Bioethics in

China’s biosecurity law IRB adaptive governance bioethics liabilities

Journal

Journal of law and the biosciences
ISSN: 2053-9711
Titre abrégé: J Law Biosci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101633120

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 15 08 2020
revised: 17 02 2021
accepted: 26 04 2021
entrez: 21 6 2021
pubmed: 22 6 2021
medline: 22 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The Biosecurity Law has laid down a regulatory framework on bioethics in China, from raising awareness through education, requiring researchers to conform to ethical principles and conduct ethical reviews on biomedical research, to giving special attention to human genetic resources. The law constructively leaves a wide range of discretion to medical institutions and professionals in ethical decision-making, adaptive to the biotechnology-ethics-regulation dynamics. This regulatory strategy poses crucial institutional challenges in its implementation, particularly on how to safeguard institutional review boards (IRB), a core mechanism in the governance, to effectively protect human subjects but not unnecessarily hinder the progress of biomedical research. Further measures need to clarify important issues on the IRB-based governance, including legal status of the IRB review decision, potential liabilities, and protections of the IRB members.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34150309
doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsab019
pii: lsab019
pmc: PMC8208103
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

lsab019

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Leifan Wang (L)

Tianjin University Law School, Tianjin, China.

Fangzhong Wang (F)

Tianjin University Law School, Tianjin, China.

Weiwen Zhang (W)

Tianjin University Law School, Tianjin, China.

Classifications MeSH