Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in HIV infection: a single-arm substudy of a phase 2/3 clinical trial.
Journal
The lancet. HIV
ISSN: 2352-3018
Titre abrégé: Lancet HIV
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101645355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2021
08 2021
Historique:
received:
19
04
2021
revised:
13
05
2021
accepted:
14
05
2021
pubmed:
22
6
2021
medline:
17
8
2021
entrez:
21
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Data on vaccine immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2 are needed for the 40 million people globally living with HIV who might have less functional immunity and more associated comorbidities than the general population. We aimed to explore safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine in people with HIV. In this single-arm open-label vaccination substudy within the protocol of the larger phase 2/3 trial COV002, adults aged 18-55 years with HIV were enrolled at two HIV clinics in London, UK. Eligible participants were required to be on antiretroviral therapy (ART), with undetectable plasma HIV viral loads (<50 copies per mL), and CD4 counts of more than 350 cells per μL. A prime-boost regimen of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, with two doses was given 4-6 weeks apart. The primary outcomes for this substudy were safety and reactogenicity of the vaccine, as determined by serious adverse events and solicited local and systemic reactions. Humoral responses were measured by anti-spike IgG ELISA and antibody-mediated live virus neutralisation. Cell-mediated immune responses were measured by ex-vivo IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISpot) and T-cell proliferation. All outcomes were compared with an HIV-uninfected group from the main COV002 study within the same age group and dosing strategy and are reported until day 56 after prime vaccination. Outcomes were analysed in all participants who received both doses and with available samples. The COV002 study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04400838, and is ongoing. Between Nov 5 and Nov 24, 2020, 54 participants with HIV (all male, median age 42·5 years [IQR 37·2-49·8]) were enrolled and received two doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Median CD4 count at enrolment was 694·0 cells per μL (IQR 573·5-859·5). No serious adverse events occurred. Local and systemic reactions occurring during the first 7 days after prime vaccination included pain at the injection site (26 [49%] of 53 participants with available data), fatigue (25 [47%]), headache (25 [47%]), malaise (18 [34%]), chills (12 [23%]), muscle ache (19 [36%]), joint pain (five [9%]), and nausea (four [8%]), the frequencies of which were similar to the HIV-negative participants. Anti-spike IgG responses by ELISA peaked at day 42 (median 1440 ELISA units [EUs; IQR 704-2728]; n=50) and were sustained until day 56 (median 941 EUs [531-1445]; n=49). We found no correlation between the magnitude of the anti-spike IgG response at day 56 and CD4 cell count (p=0·93) or age (p=0·48). ELISpot and T-cell proliferative responses peaked at day 14 and 28 after prime dose and were sustained to day 56. Compared with participants without HIV, we found no difference in magnitude or persistence of SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific humoral or cellular responses (p>0·05 for all analyses). In this study of people with HIV, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was safe and immunogenic, supporting vaccination for those well controlled on ART. UK Research and Innovation, National Institutes for Health Research (NIHR), Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Thames Valley and South Midland's NIHR Clinical Research Network, and AstraZeneca.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Data on vaccine immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2 are needed for the 40 million people globally living with HIV who might have less functional immunity and more associated comorbidities than the general population. We aimed to explore safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine in people with HIV.
METHODS
In this single-arm open-label vaccination substudy within the protocol of the larger phase 2/3 trial COV002, adults aged 18-55 years with HIV were enrolled at two HIV clinics in London, UK. Eligible participants were required to be on antiretroviral therapy (ART), with undetectable plasma HIV viral loads (<50 copies per mL), and CD4 counts of more than 350 cells per μL. A prime-boost regimen of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, with two doses was given 4-6 weeks apart. The primary outcomes for this substudy were safety and reactogenicity of the vaccine, as determined by serious adverse events and solicited local and systemic reactions. Humoral responses were measured by anti-spike IgG ELISA and antibody-mediated live virus neutralisation. Cell-mediated immune responses were measured by ex-vivo IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISpot) and T-cell proliferation. All outcomes were compared with an HIV-uninfected group from the main COV002 study within the same age group and dosing strategy and are reported until day 56 after prime vaccination. Outcomes were analysed in all participants who received both doses and with available samples. The COV002 study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04400838, and is ongoing.
FINDINGS
Between Nov 5 and Nov 24, 2020, 54 participants with HIV (all male, median age 42·5 years [IQR 37·2-49·8]) were enrolled and received two doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Median CD4 count at enrolment was 694·0 cells per μL (IQR 573·5-859·5). No serious adverse events occurred. Local and systemic reactions occurring during the first 7 days after prime vaccination included pain at the injection site (26 [49%] of 53 participants with available data), fatigue (25 [47%]), headache (25 [47%]), malaise (18 [34%]), chills (12 [23%]), muscle ache (19 [36%]), joint pain (five [9%]), and nausea (four [8%]), the frequencies of which were similar to the HIV-negative participants. Anti-spike IgG responses by ELISA peaked at day 42 (median 1440 ELISA units [EUs; IQR 704-2728]; n=50) and were sustained until day 56 (median 941 EUs [531-1445]; n=49). We found no correlation between the magnitude of the anti-spike IgG response at day 56 and CD4 cell count (p=0·93) or age (p=0·48). ELISpot and T-cell proliferative responses peaked at day 14 and 28 after prime dose and were sustained to day 56. Compared with participants without HIV, we found no difference in magnitude or persistence of SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific humoral or cellular responses (p>0·05 for all analyses).
INTERPRETATION
In this study of people with HIV, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was safe and immunogenic, supporting vaccination for those well controlled on ART.
FUNDING
UK Research and Innovation, National Institutes for Health Research (NIHR), Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Thames Valley and South Midland's NIHR Clinical Research Network, and AstraZeneca.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34153264
pii: S2352-3018(21)00103-X
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00103-X
pmc: PMC8213361
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19
B5S3K2V0G8
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04400838']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e474-e485Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00004/04
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/P011233/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L00528X/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 220171/Z/20/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 109965/Z/15/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Investigateurs
Marion E E Watson
(MEE)
Rinn Song
(R)
Paola Cicconi
(P)
Angela M Minassian
(AM)
Sagida Bibi
(S)
Simon Kerridge
(S)
Nisha Singh
(N)
Catherine M Green
(CM)
Alexander D Douglas
(AD)
Alison M Lawrie
(AM)
Elizabeth A Clutterbuck
(EA)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests Oxford University has entered into a partnership with AstraZeneca for further development of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222). SCG is cofounder of Vaccitech (a collaborator in the early development of this vaccine candidate) and named as an inventor on a patent covering use of ChAdOx1-vectored vaccines (PCT/GB2012/000467) and a patent application covering this SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. TL is named as an inventor on a patent application covering this SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and was consultant to Vaccitech. PMF is a consultant to Vaccitech and has received research funding from the Brazilian Government. AJP is Chair of the UK Department of Health and Social Care's Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, but does not participate in policy advice on SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and is a member of the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts. AVSH is a cofounder of and consultant to Vaccitech and is named as an inventor on a patent covering design and use of ChAdOx1-vectored vaccines (PCT/GB2012/000467). SF is a consultant to Immunocore. GRS has received funding from Schmidt Futures and Wellcome Trust, consulting fees from GSK Vaccines Strategic Advisory Board, has patents on SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies, has leadership roles on Oxford University Council and Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and holds stock in GSK. KP reports grants from the UK Medical Research Council UK Research and Innovation and National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Vaccine Taskforce for RNA vaccine trial, COVAC1, and honoraria for Sanofi strategic advisory boards. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):270-278
pubmed: 33335323
Lancet. 2021 Jan 9;397(10269):99-111
pubmed: 33306989
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 27;373(9):795-807
pubmed: 26192873
N Engl J Med. 1998 Mar 26;338(13):853-60
pubmed: 9516219
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1412-1423
pubmed: 33626250
Lancet HIV. 2021 Jan;8(1):e24-e32
pubmed: 33316211
Nat Commun. 2021 Apr 6;12(1):2055
pubmed: 33824342
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;58(8):1130-9
pubmed: 24415637
Cancer Cell. 2021 Feb 8;39(2):257-275.e6
pubmed: 33476581
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 04;9(6):
pubmed: 32512688
Cell. 2021 Apr 15;184(8):2201-2211.e7
pubmed: 33743891
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 5;73(7):e2095-e2106
pubmed: 33095853
Immunol Rev. 2013 Jul;254(1):78-101
pubmed: 23772616
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Nov;21(11):1539-1548
pubmed: 34174190
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Oct 6;173(7):536-541
pubmed: 32589451
AIDS. 2010 Sep 10;24(14):2187-92
pubmed: 20616698
Vaccine. 2000 Jan 18;18(13):1161-5
pubmed: 10649616
Lancet. 2020 Aug 15;396(10249):467-478
pubmed: 32702298
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037069
pubmed: 33533933
AIDS. 2016 Sep 24;30(15):2289-98
pubmed: 27427877
Nat Med. 2006 Oct;12(10):1198-202
pubmed: 16917489
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416
pubmed: 33378609
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 5;73(7):e2005-e2015
pubmed: 32860699
Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):1979-1993
pubmed: 33220855
N Engl J Med. 1987 Mar 5;316(10):630-1
pubmed: 3807959
Lancet. 2021 Apr 10;397(10282):1351-1362
pubmed: 33798499
HIV Med. 2016 Aug;17 Suppl 3:s2-s81
pubmed: 27568789
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
Lancet HIV. 2021 Sep;8(9):e568-e580
pubmed: 34416193