Failed Latarjet procedure: a systematic review of surgery revision options.
Complication
Coracoid transfer
Eden–Hybinette
Failed Latarjet
Recurrent shoulder instability
Shoulder stabilization
Journal
Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
ISSN: 1590-9999
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Traumatol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101090931
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Jun 2021
21 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
22
12
2020
accepted:
03
06
2021
entrez:
22
6
2021
pubmed:
23
6
2021
medline:
21
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Revision surgery after the Latarjet procedure is a rare and challenging surgical problem, and various bony or capsular procedures have been proposed. This systematic review examines clinical and radiographic outcomes of different procedures for treating persistent pain or recurrent instability after a Latarjet procedure. A systematic review of the literature was performed using the Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Ovid databases with the combined keywords "failed", "failure", "revision", "Latarjet", "shoulder stabilization" and "shoulder instability" to identify articles published in English that deal with failed Latarjet procedures. A total of 11 studies (five retrospective and six case series investigations), all published between 2008 and 2020, fulfilled our inclusion criteria. For the study, 253 patients (254 shoulders, 79.8% male) with a mean age of 29.6 years (range: 16-54 years) were reviewed at an average follow-up of 51.5 months (range: 24-208 months). Eden-Hybinette and arthroscopic capsuloplasty are the most popular and safe procedures to treat recurrent instability after a failed Latarjet procedure, and yield reasonable clinical outcomes. A bone graft procedure and capsuloplasty were proposed but there was no clear consensus on their efficacy and indication. Level of evidence Level IV Trial registration PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020185090- www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Revision surgery after the Latarjet procedure is a rare and challenging surgical problem, and various bony or capsular procedures have been proposed. This systematic review examines clinical and radiographic outcomes of different procedures for treating persistent pain or recurrent instability after a Latarjet procedure.
METHODS
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was performed using the Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Ovid databases with the combined keywords "failed", "failure", "revision", "Latarjet", "shoulder stabilization" and "shoulder instability" to identify articles published in English that deal with failed Latarjet procedures.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 11 studies (five retrospective and six case series investigations), all published between 2008 and 2020, fulfilled our inclusion criteria. For the study, 253 patients (254 shoulders, 79.8% male) with a mean age of 29.6 years (range: 16-54 years) were reviewed at an average follow-up of 51.5 months (range: 24-208 months).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Eden-Hybinette and arthroscopic capsuloplasty are the most popular and safe procedures to treat recurrent instability after a failed Latarjet procedure, and yield reasonable clinical outcomes. A bone graft procedure and capsuloplasty were proposed but there was no clear consensus on their efficacy and indication. Level of evidence Level IV Trial registration PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020185090- www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34155563
doi: 10.1186/s10195-021-00587-7
pii: 10.1186/s10195-021-00587-7
pmc: PMC8217356
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
24Références
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Aug;21(8):1110-9
pubmed: 22608928
Arthroscopy. 2008 May;24(5):514-9
pubmed: 18442682
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Sep 7;98(17):1484-9
pubmed: 27605693
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2000 Feb;10(1):2-11
pubmed: 10693606
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 May;21(5):647-60
pubmed: 21719316
Int Orthop. 2019 Aug;43(8):1899-1907
pubmed: 30151779
Arthroscopy. 2014 Sep;30(9):1184-211
pubmed: 24907025
Int Orthop. 2018 Oct;42(10):2491-2495
pubmed: 29744648
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Dec;10(4):452-462
pubmed: 28994027
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Feb;22(2):286-92
pubmed: 23352473
Arthroscopy. 2014 Apr;30(4):506-22
pubmed: 24680311
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Aug 7;95(15):1390-7
pubmed: 23925743
Arthroscopy. 2009 Oct;25(10):1075-84
pubmed: 19801285
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):1792-7
pubmed: 19483076
JSES Int. 2020 Jan 11;4(1):68-71
pubmed: 32195466
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 25;19(1):255
pubmed: 30045745
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 May;25(5):853-63
pubmed: 26809355
Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Oct;12(5):315-329
pubmed: 33123221
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Oct;20(7):1095-101
pubmed: 21602067
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Dec;92 Suppl 2:133-51
pubmed: 21123597
Arthroscopy. 2017 Jan;33(1):39-48
pubmed: 27432589
Musculoskelet Surg. 2010 May;94 Suppl 1:S47-55
pubmed: 20383681
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Apr;106(2):223-227
pubmed: 32173300
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Oct;47(12):3002-3008
pubmed: 31038983
Orthop Clin North Am. 2010 Jul;41(3):393-405
pubmed: 20497814
Clin Sports Med. 2013 Oct;32(4):833-63
pubmed: 24079439
Clin Orthop Surg. 2016 Mar;8(1):84-91
pubmed: 26929804
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Jan 7;97(1):1-2
pubmed: 25568387
Arthroscopy. 2019 Sep;35(9):2581-2588
pubmed: 31500743
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3198-3205
pubmed: 27501835
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Oct;47(12):2795-2802
pubmed: 31498688
Am J Sports Med. 2006 May;34(5):778-86
pubmed: 16399933
Arthroscopy. 2017 May;33(5):910-917
pubmed: 27989356
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Sep-Oct;17(5):744-50
pubmed: 18619868
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Nov;28(11):e377-e388
pubmed: 31331667
Arthroscopy. 2019 Dec;35(12):3221-3237
pubmed: 31785749
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Feb;28(2):e33-e39
pubmed: 30545784
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Dec;21(12):1721-7
pubmed: 22565042
JBJS Rev. 2018 Oct;6(10):e10
pubmed: 30376462