Clinic Time Required for Remote and In-Person Management of Patients With Cardiac Devices: Time and Motion Workflow Evaluation.

cardiac implantable electronic devices clinic efficiency digital health mobile phone patient management remote monitoring

Journal

JMIR cardio
ISSN: 2561-1011
Titre abrégé: JMIR Cardio
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101718325

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Oct 2021
Historique:
received: 04 02 2021
accepted: 31 05 2021
revised: 02 04 2021
pubmed: 23 6 2021
medline: 23 6 2021
entrez: 22 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The number of patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) is increasing, creating a substantial workload for device clinics. This study aims to characterize the workflow and quantify clinic staff time requirements for managing patients with CIEDs. A time and motion workflow evaluation was performed in 11 US and European CIEDs clinics. Workflow tasks were repeatedly timed during 1 business week of observation at each clinic; these observations included all device models and manufacturers. The mean cumulative staff time required to review a remote device transmission and an in-person clinic visit were calculated, including all necessary clinical and administrative tasks. The annual staff time to manage a patient with a CIED was modeled using CIED transmission volumes, clinical guidelines, and the published literature. A total of 276 in-person clinic visits and 2173 remote monitoring activities were observed. Mean staff time required per remote transmission ranged from 9.4 to 13.5 minutes for therapeutic devices (pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and cardiac resynchronization therapy) and from 11.3 to 12.9 minutes for diagnostic devices such as insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs). Mean staff time per in-person visit ranged from 37.8 to 51.0 and from 39.9 to 45.8 minutes for therapeutic devices and ICMs, respectively. Including all remote and in-person follow-ups, the estimated annual time to manage a patient with a CIED ranged from 1.6 to 2.4 hours for therapeutic devices and from 7.7 to 9.3 hours for ICMs. The CIED patient management workflow is complex and requires significant staff time. Understanding process steps and time requirements informs the implementation of efficiency improvements, including remote solutions. Future research should examine heterogeneity in patient management processes to identify the most efficient workflow.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The number of patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) is increasing, creating a substantial workload for device clinics.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aims to characterize the workflow and quantify clinic staff time requirements for managing patients with CIEDs.
METHODS METHODS
A time and motion workflow evaluation was performed in 11 US and European CIEDs clinics. Workflow tasks were repeatedly timed during 1 business week of observation at each clinic; these observations included all device models and manufacturers. The mean cumulative staff time required to review a remote device transmission and an in-person clinic visit were calculated, including all necessary clinical and administrative tasks. The annual staff time to manage a patient with a CIED was modeled using CIED transmission volumes, clinical guidelines, and the published literature.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 276 in-person clinic visits and 2173 remote monitoring activities were observed. Mean staff time required per remote transmission ranged from 9.4 to 13.5 minutes for therapeutic devices (pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and cardiac resynchronization therapy) and from 11.3 to 12.9 minutes for diagnostic devices such as insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs). Mean staff time per in-person visit ranged from 37.8 to 51.0 and from 39.9 to 45.8 minutes for therapeutic devices and ICMs, respectively. Including all remote and in-person follow-ups, the estimated annual time to manage a patient with a CIED ranged from 1.6 to 2.4 hours for therapeutic devices and from 7.7 to 9.3 hours for ICMs.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The CIED patient management workflow is complex and requires significant staff time. Understanding process steps and time requirements informs the implementation of efficiency improvements, including remote solutions. Future research should examine heterogeneity in patient management processes to identify the most efficient workflow.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34156344
pii: v5i2e27720
doi: 10.2196/27720
pmc: PMC8556635
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e27720

Informations de copyright

©Amber Seiler, Eliana Biundo, Marco Di Bacco, Sarah Rosemas, Emmanuelle Nicolle, David Lanctin, Juliette Hennion, Mirko de Melis, Laura Van Heel. Originally published in JMIR Cardio (https://cardio.jmir.org), 15.10.2021.

Références

Heart Rhythm. 2011 Sep;8(9):1476-7
pubmed: 21699836
Eur Heart J. 2012 May;33(9):1105-11
pubmed: 22127418
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Mar;19(3):416-425
pubmed: 27568392
JMIR Cardio. 2019 Dec 18;3(2):e9815
pubmed: 31845898
Eur Heart J. 2014 May 21;35(20):1345-52
pubmed: 24595864
Europace. 2013 Jul;15(7):970-7
pubmed: 23362021
Europace. 2008 Feb;10(2):164-70
pubmed: 18199570
J Card Fail. 2020 Jun;26(6):448-456
pubmed: 32315732
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 26;21(7):e14142
pubmed: 31350836
Am Heart J. 2008 May;155(5):896-903
pubmed: 18440339
Interact J Med Res. 2016 Jan 13;5(1):e4
pubmed: 26764170
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013 Jun;37(1):69-78
pubmed: 23515883
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Sep;31(9):1202-12
pubmed: 18834475
J Med Syst. 2018 Mar 22;42(5):80
pubmed: 29564649
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 20;19(1):e18
pubmed: 28108430
Eur Heart J. 2013 Feb;34(8):605-14
pubmed: 23242192
Eur Heart J. 2013 Aug;34(29):2281-329
pubmed: 23801822
Eur Heart J. 2015 Jan 14;36(3):158-69
pubmed: 25179766
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 26;370(26):2478-86
pubmed: 24963567
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010 Jun 1;33(6):705-11
pubmed: 20059714
Circulation. 2012 Jun 19;125(24):2985-92
pubmed: 22626743
Heart Rhythm. 2012 Dec;9(12):1947-51
pubmed: 22864266
Circulation. 2010 Jul 27;122(4):325-32
pubmed: 20625110
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jul;12(7):e69-100
pubmed: 25981148
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Jul;8(4):403-12
pubmed: 26105725
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;220:781-6
pubmed: 27394974
Europace. 2013 Jun;15 Suppl 1:i49-i53
pubmed: 23737231
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Mar 8;57(10):1181-9
pubmed: 21255955
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;22(6):995-998
pubmed: 32385954
Europace. 2008 Oct;10(10):1145-51
pubmed: 18703585

Auteurs

Amber Seiler (A)

Cone Health Medical Group, Greensboro, NC, United States.

Eliana Biundo (E)

Deloitte, Brussels, Belgium.

Marco Di Bacco (M)

Medtronic, Mounds View, MN, United States.

Sarah Rosemas (S)

Medtronic, Mounds View, MN, United States.

Emmanuelle Nicolle (E)

Medtronic, Mounds View, MN, United States.

David Lanctin (D)

Medtronic, Mounds View, MN, United States.

Mirko de Melis (M)

Medtronic, Mounds View, MN, United States.

Laura Van Heel (L)

Centracare, St. Cloud, MN, United States.

Classifications MeSH