Knowledge and perception of biosimilars in ambulatory care: a survey among Belgian community pharmacists and physicians.
Ambulatory care
Biologic
Biosimilar
Community pharmacist
Healthcare professional
Interchangeability
Pharmacy substitution
Physician
Primary care
Journal
Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice
ISSN: 2052-3211
Titre abrégé: J Pharm Policy Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101627192
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Jun 2021
22 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
03
03
2021
accepted:
31
05
2021
entrez:
23
6
2021
pubmed:
24
6
2021
medline:
24
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
With the approval of biosimilars for subcutaneously administered products, such as adalimumab, etanercept and insulin, biosimilars become increasingly available in ambulatory care. Little is known about the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare providers who are in charge of dispensing and prescribing biosimilars in this context. This study aims to assess the knowledge and perception about biosimilars among community pharmacists and physicians. Belgian community pharmacists (n = 177) and physicians (n = 30) were surveyed on their knowledge, experience with dispensing/prescribing biologicals including biosimilars, perception regarding interchangeability, switching and substitution and informational and educational needs. Descriptive and statistical analyses were performed. Only 32% of community pharmacists and 52% of physicians had yet dispensed/prescribed a biosimilar. Approximately 35% of community pharmacists felt insufficiently trained to counsel patients with biosimilar therapy, which was significantly higher compared to their self-assessed competence to counsel patients with biological therapy in general (p = 0.023). Community pharmacists experienced questions about similarity between reference products and biosimilars (47%) and their interchangeability (42%). Over 40% of physicians found patient uncertainty about efficacy and safety challenging when prescribing biosimilars. A similar proportion of physicians would only prescribe a biosimilar in indications for which the biosimilar has been tested clinically. The majority of pharmacists (58%) was in favor of substitution of biologicals, on the condition that the prescriber would be contacted. Also over 40% of physicians was open to this approach in case of substitution. Educational support, budget for additional staff and transparency about savings were considered suitable stimuli to incentivize biosimilar use. The need for information about biologicals including biosimilars was nearly unanimous among community pharmacists. Also 67% of physicians requested more information. Both community pharmacists and physicians preferred to be informed by their respective professional associations. This study showed a substantial need for targeted educational measures to increase the knowledge and confidence about both biological medicines in general and biosimilars in particular among Belgian community pharmacists and physicians. The results may inform educational and policy measures to stimulate biosimilar use in ambulatory care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
With the approval of biosimilars for subcutaneously administered products, such as adalimumab, etanercept and insulin, biosimilars become increasingly available in ambulatory care. Little is known about the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare providers who are in charge of dispensing and prescribing biosimilars in this context. This study aims to assess the knowledge and perception about biosimilars among community pharmacists and physicians.
METHODS
METHODS
Belgian community pharmacists (n = 177) and physicians (n = 30) were surveyed on their knowledge, experience with dispensing/prescribing biologicals including biosimilars, perception regarding interchangeability, switching and substitution and informational and educational needs. Descriptive and statistical analyses were performed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Only 32% of community pharmacists and 52% of physicians had yet dispensed/prescribed a biosimilar. Approximately 35% of community pharmacists felt insufficiently trained to counsel patients with biosimilar therapy, which was significantly higher compared to their self-assessed competence to counsel patients with biological therapy in general (p = 0.023). Community pharmacists experienced questions about similarity between reference products and biosimilars (47%) and their interchangeability (42%). Over 40% of physicians found patient uncertainty about efficacy and safety challenging when prescribing biosimilars. A similar proportion of physicians would only prescribe a biosimilar in indications for which the biosimilar has been tested clinically. The majority of pharmacists (58%) was in favor of substitution of biologicals, on the condition that the prescriber would be contacted. Also over 40% of physicians was open to this approach in case of substitution. Educational support, budget for additional staff and transparency about savings were considered suitable stimuli to incentivize biosimilar use. The need for information about biologicals including biosimilars was nearly unanimous among community pharmacists. Also 67% of physicians requested more information. Both community pharmacists and physicians preferred to be informed by their respective professional associations.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study showed a substantial need for targeted educational measures to increase the knowledge and confidence about both biological medicines in general and biosimilars in particular among Belgian community pharmacists and physicians. The results may inform educational and policy measures to stimulate biosimilar use in ambulatory care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34158128
doi: 10.1186/s40545-021-00330-x
pii: 10.1186/s40545-021-00330-x
pmc: PMC8218462
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
53Références
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 28;9(10):e032892
pubmed: 31662405
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Jul;32(7):681-91
pubmed: 24803078
BioDrugs. 2017 Oct;31(5):447-459
pubmed: 28929342
MAbs. 2017 Feb/Mar;9(2):383-390
pubmed: 27929743
Front Public Health. 2018 Dec 05;6:328
pubmed: 30568938
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017 Aug;88:252-261
pubmed: 28666961
Acta Clin Belg. 2020 May 13;:1-12
pubmed: 32400319
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 19;12:644187
pubmed: 33953678
BMJ Open. 2020 May 5;10(5):e034183
pubmed: 32371511
BioDrugs. 2019 Dec;33(6):621-634
pubmed: 31541400
BioDrugs. 2020 Dec;34(6):797-808
pubmed: 33063267
BioDrugs. 2020 Apr;34(2):159-170
pubmed: 31792843
BioDrugs. 2020 Dec;34(6):783-796
pubmed: 33141421
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Feb 9;:
pubmed: 33560486