Additional fundophrenicopexia, after Nissen fundoplication, reduces postoperative dysphagia and re-operation rate in the long-term follow up.
Division of the short gastric vessels
Dysphagia
Fundophrenicopexia
GERD
Nissen fundoplication
Re-herniation
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2022
05 2022
Historique:
received:
25
07
2020
accepted:
06
06
2021
pubmed:
24
6
2021
medline:
15
4
2022
entrez:
23
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Various technical modifications of Nissen fundoplication (NF) that aim to improve patients' outcomes have been discussed. This study aims to evaluate the effect of division of the short gastric vessels (SGV) and the addition of a standardized fundophrenicopexia on the postoperative outcome after NF. 283 consecutive patients with GERD treated with NF were divided into four groups following consecutive time periods: with division of the SGV and without fundophrenicopexia (group A), with division of the SGV and with fundophrenicopexia (group B), without division of the SGV and with fundophrenicopexia (group C) and without division of the SGV and without fundophrenicopexia (group D). Postoperative contrast swallow, dysphagia scoring, GEDR-HRQL and proton pump inhibitor intake were evaluated. A comparative analysis of patients with division of the SGV and those without (161 A + B vs. 122 C + D), and patients with fundophrenicopexia and those without (78 A vs. 83 B and 49 C vs. 73 D) was performed. Fundophrenicopexia reduced postoperative dysphagia rates (0 group C vs. 5 group D, p = 0.021) in patients where the SGV were preserved and reoperation rates (1 group B vs. 7 group A, p = 0.017) in patients where the SGV were divided. There was no significant difference in the postoperative rates of heartburn relief, dysphagia, gas bloating syndrome, interventions, re-fundoplication and the GERD-HRQL score between groups A + B and C + D, respectively. Standardized additional fundophrenicopexia in patients undergoing Nissen fundoplication significantly reduces postoperative dysphagia in patients without division of the SGV and reoperation rates in patients with division of the SGV. Division of the SGV has no influence on the postoperative outcome of NF.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Various technical modifications of Nissen fundoplication (NF) that aim to improve patients' outcomes have been discussed. This study aims to evaluate the effect of division of the short gastric vessels (SGV) and the addition of a standardized fundophrenicopexia on the postoperative outcome after NF.
METHODS
283 consecutive patients with GERD treated with NF were divided into four groups following consecutive time periods: with division of the SGV and without fundophrenicopexia (group A), with division of the SGV and with fundophrenicopexia (group B), without division of the SGV and with fundophrenicopexia (group C) and without division of the SGV and without fundophrenicopexia (group D). Postoperative contrast swallow, dysphagia scoring, GEDR-HRQL and proton pump inhibitor intake were evaluated. A comparative analysis of patients with division of the SGV and those without (161 A + B vs. 122 C + D), and patients with fundophrenicopexia and those without (78 A vs. 83 B and 49 C vs. 73 D) was performed.
RESULTS
Fundophrenicopexia reduced postoperative dysphagia rates (0 group C vs. 5 group D, p = 0.021) in patients where the SGV were preserved and reoperation rates (1 group B vs. 7 group A, p = 0.017) in patients where the SGV were divided. There was no significant difference in the postoperative rates of heartburn relief, dysphagia, gas bloating syndrome, interventions, re-fundoplication and the GERD-HRQL score between groups A + B and C + D, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Standardized additional fundophrenicopexia in patients undergoing Nissen fundoplication significantly reduces postoperative dysphagia in patients without division of the SGV and reoperation rates in patients with division of the SGV. Division of the SGV has no influence on the postoperative outcome of NF.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34159461
doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08598-5
pii: 10.1007/s00464-021-08598-5
pmc: PMC9001554
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3019-3027Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Int J Surg. 2017 Feb;38:83-89
pubmed: 28040500
Arch Surg. 2000 Sep;135(9):1055-61; discussion 1061-2
pubmed: 10982510
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Oct 01;24(4):559-569
pubmed: 30347935
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jun;25(6):2055; author reply 2056
pubmed: 21136117
Ann Surg. 2008 Jan;247(1):38-42
pubmed: 18156921
Am J Surg. 2001 Sep;182(3):215-21
pubmed: 11587680
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jan;96(1):e5779
pubmed: 28072725
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3289-96
pubmed: 26541740
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Aug;21(4):267-70
pubmed: 21857477
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Jun;198(6):863-9; discussion 869-70
pubmed: 15194064
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Aug;13(8):1539-49
pubmed: 19347410
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Jun;23(3):281-5
pubmed: 23751993
Ann Surg. 2005 Jan;241(1):185-93
pubmed: 15622007
Am Surg. 2003 Mar;69(3):219-23; discussion 223-4
pubmed: 12678478
Ann Surg. 2018 Aug;268(2):228-232
pubmed: 29303805
Surg Endosc. 1997 Nov;11(11):1080-3
pubmed: 9348378
Surg Endosc. 2009 Nov;23(11):2505-8
pubmed: 19343436
Br J Surg. 2011 Aug;98(8):1063-7
pubmed: 21618497
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Mar;21(3):441-445
pubmed: 27834011
Ann Surg. 1986 Jul;204(1):9-20
pubmed: 3729589
Gut. 2014 Jun;63(6):871-80
pubmed: 23853213
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 23;368(21):2039-40
pubmed: 23697523
Int J Surg. 2015 Nov;23(Pt A):35-40
pubmed: 26360740
Br J Surg. 2008 Jan;95(1):57-63
pubmed: 18076018
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1196-1205
pubmed: 30171395
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Jun;43(11):1124-31
pubmed: 27060607
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):21-30
pubmed: 18027055
Br J Surg. 1999 May;86(5):614-8
pubmed: 10361180
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2015 Jun;42(3):154-8
pubmed: 26291255
Int J Surg. 2017 Oct;46:75-78
pubmed: 28882768
JAMA. 2011 May 18;305(19):1969-77
pubmed: 21586712
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 May;11(5):465-71; quiz e39
pubmed: 23267868
Am J Surg. 1975 Jan;129(1):94-100
pubmed: 2024
Surg Endosc. 2009 Oct;23(10):2208-13
pubmed: 19082662
Ann Surg. 2005 Jun;241(6):861-9; discussion 869-71
pubmed: 15912035
J Obes. 2017;2017:7589408
pubmed: 28584666
Am J Dig Dis. 1961 Oct;6:954-61
pubmed: 14480031
Surg Endosc. 2000 May;14(5):473-7
pubmed: 10858475
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Mar;147(3):909-14
pubmed: 24332098
World J Surg. 2020 Jan;44(1):186-193
pubmed: 31605176
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3225-30
pubmed: 26541730
Ann Surg. 2002 Feb;235(2):165-70
pubmed: 11807353
Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):390-4
pubmed: 19551431
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4811-4816
pubmed: 32794047
Dis Esophagus. 2011 May;24(4):215-23
pubmed: 21073616
Br J Surg. 2011 Aug;98(8):1056-62
pubmed: 21560121
J Minim Access Surg. 2017 Jul-Sep;13(3):208-214
pubmed: 28607289
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jan 27;8(1):77-83
pubmed: 26843915
Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2520-4
pubmed: 25487547
Arch Surg. 2005 Oct;140(10):946-51
pubmed: 16230543
Gastrointest Endosc. 1995 Mar;41(3):189-95
pubmed: 7789675
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jul;221(1):123-8
pubmed: 26095560
Surg Endosc. 1996 Oct;10(10):979-82
pubmed: 8864089
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jun;24(6):1303-9
pubmed: 19960205
Surg Endosc. 2006 Nov;20(11):1662-70
pubmed: 17024541
J Pediatr Surg. 1997 Feb;32(2):324-6; discussion 326-7
pubmed: 9044146