Development of patient-reported outcomes item set to evaluate acute treatment toxicity to pelvic online magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy.
Acute toxicity
Cancer
Item selection
MR-linac
Online MRgRT
PRO
Patient-reported outcomes
Pelvic
Radiotherapy
Journal
Journal of patient-reported outcomes
ISSN: 2509-8020
Titre abrégé: J Patient Rep Outcomes
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101722688
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Jun 2021
23 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
29
01
2021
accepted:
10
06
2021
entrez:
23
6
2021
pubmed:
24
6
2021
medline:
24
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A new technology in cancer treatment, the MR-linac, provides online magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) that combines real-time visualization of the tumor and surrounding tissue with radiation therapy to deliver treatment more accurately. Online MRgRT makes it possible to minimize treatment volume, potentially reducing acute treatment toxicity. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) add the patient perspective to evaluating treatment toxicity related to new technology. The objective of this mixed-methods study was to develop and explore the content validity of a set of PRO items to evaluate acute pelvic toxicity to radiotherapy including online MRgRT. A literature review and chart audit were conducted to identify symptomatic adverse events (AEs) to be selected from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) library and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) item library. To validate the content, the item set was applied in a prospective pilot cohort of patients referred for primary pelvic RT with curative intent. Patients reported symptoms weekly during RT (4-8 weeks) and the subsequent 4 weeks. Follow-up reports were collected at 8, 12, and 24 weeks after RT. To ensure symptom coverage clinician-reported toxicity and individual patient interviews were conducted. The symptomatic AEs were included in the final item set if ≥20% of patients reported them. Eighteen acute symptomatic AEs were selected for the initial item set. Forty patients (32 prostate cancer, 8 cervical cancer) were included in the pilot study. Patients with prostate cancer and those with cervical cancer both reported all 18 acute AEs. However, vomiting was not reported by > 20% of patients thus excluded from the item set. Adding a few diagnosis-specific AEs to the final item set was required for both prostate and cervical cancer patients. A PRO item set for patients with pelvic cancer treated with radiotherapy with a curative intent was developed and content validity explored. In the pilot study, the item set captured the most common acute symptomatic AEs for patients with prostate and cervical cancer related to pelvic RT including online MRgRT. Further validation of the content in broader disease sites would be needed in future studies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A new technology in cancer treatment, the MR-linac, provides online magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) that combines real-time visualization of the tumor and surrounding tissue with radiation therapy to deliver treatment more accurately. Online MRgRT makes it possible to minimize treatment volume, potentially reducing acute treatment toxicity. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) add the patient perspective to evaluating treatment toxicity related to new technology. The objective of this mixed-methods study was to develop and explore the content validity of a set of PRO items to evaluate acute pelvic toxicity to radiotherapy including online MRgRT.
METHODS
METHODS
A literature review and chart audit were conducted to identify symptomatic adverse events (AEs) to be selected from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) library and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) item library. To validate the content, the item set was applied in a prospective pilot cohort of patients referred for primary pelvic RT with curative intent. Patients reported symptoms weekly during RT (4-8 weeks) and the subsequent 4 weeks. Follow-up reports were collected at 8, 12, and 24 weeks after RT. To ensure symptom coverage clinician-reported toxicity and individual patient interviews were conducted. The symptomatic AEs were included in the final item set if ≥20% of patients reported them.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Eighteen acute symptomatic AEs were selected for the initial item set. Forty patients (32 prostate cancer, 8 cervical cancer) were included in the pilot study. Patients with prostate cancer and those with cervical cancer both reported all 18 acute AEs. However, vomiting was not reported by > 20% of patients thus excluded from the item set. Adding a few diagnosis-specific AEs to the final item set was required for both prostate and cervical cancer patients.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
A PRO item set for patients with pelvic cancer treated with radiotherapy with a curative intent was developed and content validity explored. In the pilot study, the item set captured the most common acute symptomatic AEs for patients with prostate and cervical cancer related to pelvic RT including online MRgRT. Further validation of the content in broader disease sites would be needed in future studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34160732
doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00326-w
pii: 10.1186/s41687-021-00326-w
pmc: PMC8220120
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
47Subventions
Organisme : Novo Nordisk Fonden
ID : NNF18OC0052974
Organisme : Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare)
ID : WP7
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Jun 11;:
pubmed: 32536573
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Aug;24(8):3669-76
pubmed: 27260018
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 10;25(32):5121-7
pubmed: 17991931
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):e146-e148
pubmed: 30728278
Acta Oncol. 2019 May;58(5):596-602
pubmed: 30702003
Acta Oncol. 2019 Oct;58(10):1352-1357
pubmed: 31241387
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jul 1;92(3):555-67
pubmed: 26068490
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Feb 1;100(2):361-373
pubmed: 29353654
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Sep 15;4(1):77
pubmed: 32930891
Acta Oncol. 2016 Sep - Oct;55(9-10):1220-1226
pubmed: 27551774
Lancet Oncol. 2003 Sep;4(9):529-36
pubmed: 12965273
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Sep;56(3):421-429
pubmed: 29807157
Acta Oncol. 2020 Jun;59(6):611-612
pubmed: 32253960
Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55
pubmed: 7165009
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Oct;28(10):4589-4612
pubmed: 32533435
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep;146(9):2379-2397
pubmed: 32372146
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2018 Nov;30(11):737-750
pubmed: 30209010
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Jun;127(3):423-430
pubmed: 29784450
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Sep 29;106(9):
pubmed: 25265940
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2019 Apr 12;18:80-86
pubmed: 31341981
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jun 1;142(6):517-23
pubmed: 27149571
Front Oncol. 2016 Oct 13;6:215
pubmed: 27790408
Front Oncol. 2017 Apr 03;7:59
pubmed: 28421162
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Mar 21;3(1):19
pubmed: 30900035
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Mar 23;15(1):69
pubmed: 32248826
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Aug 22;3(1):56
pubmed: 31440865
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;1(1):1
pubmed: 29757324
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1051-9
pubmed: 26270597
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2017 Oct;27(4):358-369
pubmed: 28865519
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:115-124
pubmed: 28987768
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Dec 1;105(5):1086-1094
pubmed: 31419510
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Aug 29;13(1):162
pubmed: 30157890
Clin Trials. 2017 Jun;14(3):255-263
pubmed: 28545337
Lancet Oncol. 2006 Nov;7(11):903-9
pubmed: 17081915
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Sep 1;102(1):44-52
pubmed: 30102201
Acta Oncol. 2018 Dec;57(12):1705-1712
pubmed: 30280631
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2018 Jan;30(1):e22-e28
pubmed: 29129469
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 10;33(8):910-5
pubmed: 25624439
Lancet Oncol. 2007 Nov;8(11):1007-17
pubmed: 17976611
Appl Nurs Res. 2016 Aug;31:1-5
pubmed: 27397810
JAMA. 2020 Jan 14;323(2):149-163
pubmed: 31935027
J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 10;32(14):1480-501
pubmed: 24711559
Scand J Public Health. 2012 Dec;40(8):795-805
pubmed: 23221918
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Nov;125(2):280-285
pubmed: 28987747
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jan;27(1):97-103
pubmed: 28884454
Radiother Oncol. 2008 Jan;86(1):25-9
pubmed: 18023488
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Nov;121:55-63
pubmed: 31561134
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12
pubmed: 19631508
Strahlenther Onkol. 2019 Apr;195(4):327-334
pubmed: 30361744