Patient-controlled admissions to inpatient care: A twelve-month naturalistic study of patients with schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses and the effects on admissions to and days in inpatient care.
Inpatient care
Inpatients
Patient participation
Patient-controlled admissions
Schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Jun 2021
24 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
03
03
2021
accepted:
07
06
2021
entrez:
24
6
2021
pubmed:
25
6
2021
medline:
29
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patients with schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses have a poor prognostic outlook and rates of recovery. Inpatient care is common, but the decision to initiate such care is not solely up to the patient but also influenced by the healthcare providers. Recent ideas about shared decision-making however challenges this idea. Patient-Controlled Admissions (PCA) refers to a care model where a patient signs a contract that allows the decision for admission into inpatient care to be transferred onto the patient. In Region Stockholm's public healthcare PCA was introduced to patients with schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses deemed to have the greatest care needs. Outcomes of a 12-month naturalistic within-group follow-up was analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. In total, 56 patients fulfilled the study's inclusion criteria, with between 20 to 42 patients having complete data and being able to analyze statistically, depending on the variable. Number of admissions, inpatient days, number of involuntary admissions, and involuntary admission days decreased, but only significantly so for inpatient days, p < .01 (a mean reduction of 11.5 days). Neither self-rated well-being, as assessed using the EQ5D-3L, or a clinician-administered rating of overall health status, the Clinical Global Impression Scale, demonstrated a significant change. The use of PCA points towards a trend in decreased hospitalization for patients with schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses, although this needs to be explored further in larger samples and over a longer follow-up.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Patients with schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses have a poor prognostic outlook and rates of recovery. Inpatient care is common, but the decision to initiate such care is not solely up to the patient but also influenced by the healthcare providers. Recent ideas about shared decision-making however challenges this idea. Patient-Controlled Admissions (PCA) refers to a care model where a patient signs a contract that allows the decision for admission into inpatient care to be transferred onto the patient.
METHODS
METHODS
In Region Stockholm's public healthcare PCA was introduced to patients with schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses deemed to have the greatest care needs. Outcomes of a 12-month naturalistic within-group follow-up was analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In total, 56 patients fulfilled the study's inclusion criteria, with between 20 to 42 patients having complete data and being able to analyze statistically, depending on the variable. Number of admissions, inpatient days, number of involuntary admissions, and involuntary admission days decreased, but only significantly so for inpatient days, p < .01 (a mean reduction of 11.5 days). Neither self-rated well-being, as assessed using the EQ5D-3L, or a clinician-administered rating of overall health status, the Clinical Global Impression Scale, demonstrated a significant change.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The use of PCA points towards a trend in decreased hospitalization for patients with schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses, although this needs to be explored further in larger samples and over a longer follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34162390
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06617-8
pii: 10.1186/s12913-021-06617-8
pmc: PMC8223388
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
598Références
Schizophr Bull. 2002;28(2):273-81
pubmed: 12693433
Nature. 2010 Nov 11;468(7321):187-93
pubmed: 21068826
Nature. 2010 Nov 11;468(7321):203-12
pubmed: 21068828
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 22;16(1):513
pubmed: 27659102
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2010 Apr;46(2):127-34
pubmed: 20377800
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Jan 20;10:2
pubmed: 21251305
Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Oct;53(10):1685-1695
pubmed: 32666605
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Apr;137(4):355-363
pubmed: 29504127
World J Psychiatry. 2012 Oct 22;2(5):74-82
pubmed: 24175171
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jun 5;2(6):e195463
pubmed: 31173128
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 1):1005-26
pubmed: 15230939
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;45(3):242-7
pubmed: 8188195
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Apr 1;65(4):442-53
pubmed: 24487405
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
Int J Eat Disord. 2017 Apr;50(4):398-405
pubmed: 28106920
Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007 Jul;4(7):28-37
pubmed: 20526405
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;161(3):473-9
pubmed: 14992973
Br J Psychiatry. 2001 Jun;178:506-17
pubmed: 11388966
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jun;100(6):1144-1152
pubmed: 28096034
Nord J Psychiatry. 2015;69(8):574-86
pubmed: 25832757
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Feb 08;13:50
pubmed: 23394123
Nord J Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;71(2):120-125
pubmed: 27739334
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 18;20(1):229
pubmed: 32188451
J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;68(7):992-7
pubmed: 17685733
Qual Life Res. 2014 Mar;23(2):431-42
pubmed: 23975375
Nord J Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;71(5):370-377
pubmed: 28326863
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016 Feb 25;10:11
pubmed: 26918028
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Nov;39(23):2347-2380
pubmed: 27820966