Performance of an AI based CAD system in solid lung nodule detection on chest phantom radiographs compared to radiology residents and fellow radiologists.

Computer-assisted diagnosis diagnostic X-ray lung neoplasm radiographic phantoms

Journal

Journal of thoracic disease
ISSN: 2072-1439
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Dis
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101533916

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2021
Historique:
entrez: 24 6 2021
pubmed: 25 6 2021
medline: 25 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Despite the decreasing relevance of chest radiography in lung cancer screening, chest radiography is still frequently applied to assess for lung nodules. The aim of the current study was to determine the accuracy of a commercial AI based CAD system for the detection of artificial lung nodules on chest radiograph phantoms and compare the performance to radiologists in training. Sixty-one anthropomorphic lung phantoms were equipped with 140 randomly deployed artificial lung nodules (5, 8, 10, 12 mm). A random generator chose nodule size and distribution before a two-plane chest X-ray (CXR) of each phantom was performed. Seven blinded radiologists in training (2 fellows, 5 residents) with 2 to 5 years of experience in chest imaging read the CXRs on a PACS-workstation independently. Results of the software were recorded separately. McNemar test was used to compare each radiologist's results to the AI-computer-aided-diagnostic (CAD) software in a per-nodule and a per-phantom approach and Fleiss-Kappa was applied for inter-rater and intra-observer agreements. Five out of seven readers showed a significantly higher accuracy than the AI algorithm. The pooled accuracies of the radiologists in a nodule-based and a phantom-based approach were 0.59 and 0.82 respectively, whereas the AI-CAD showed accuracies of 0.47 and 0.67, respectively. Radiologists' average sensitivity for 10 and 12 mm nodules was 0.80 and dropped to 0.66 for 8 mm (P=0.04) and 0.14 for 5 mm nodules (P<0.001). The radiologists and the algorithm both demonstrated a significant higher sensitivity for peripheral compared to central nodules (0.66 The AI based CAD system as a primary reader acts inferior to radiologists regarding lung nodule detection in chest phantoms. Chest radiography has reasonable accuracy in lung nodule detection if read by a radiologist alone and may be further optimized by an AI based CAD system as a second reader.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Despite the decreasing relevance of chest radiography in lung cancer screening, chest radiography is still frequently applied to assess for lung nodules. The aim of the current study was to determine the accuracy of a commercial AI based CAD system for the detection of artificial lung nodules on chest radiograph phantoms and compare the performance to radiologists in training.
METHODS METHODS
Sixty-one anthropomorphic lung phantoms were equipped with 140 randomly deployed artificial lung nodules (5, 8, 10, 12 mm). A random generator chose nodule size and distribution before a two-plane chest X-ray (CXR) of each phantom was performed. Seven blinded radiologists in training (2 fellows, 5 residents) with 2 to 5 years of experience in chest imaging read the CXRs on a PACS-workstation independently. Results of the software were recorded separately. McNemar test was used to compare each radiologist's results to the AI-computer-aided-diagnostic (CAD) software in a per-nodule and a per-phantom approach and Fleiss-Kappa was applied for inter-rater and intra-observer agreements.
RESULTS RESULTS
Five out of seven readers showed a significantly higher accuracy than the AI algorithm. The pooled accuracies of the radiologists in a nodule-based and a phantom-based approach were 0.59 and 0.82 respectively, whereas the AI-CAD showed accuracies of 0.47 and 0.67, respectively. Radiologists' average sensitivity for 10 and 12 mm nodules was 0.80 and dropped to 0.66 for 8 mm (P=0.04) and 0.14 for 5 mm nodules (P<0.001). The radiologists and the algorithm both demonstrated a significant higher sensitivity for peripheral compared to central nodules (0.66
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The AI based CAD system as a primary reader acts inferior to radiologists regarding lung nodule detection in chest phantoms. Chest radiography has reasonable accuracy in lung nodule detection if read by a radiologist alone and may be further optimized by an AI based CAD system as a second reader.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34164165
doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3522
pii: jtd-13-05-2728
pmc: PMC8182550
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2728-2737

Informations de copyright

2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-3522). Dr. JHT reports grants from Bayer Healthcare AG, grants from Guerbet AG, grants from Siemens Healthineers and grants from Bracco Imaging Spa, outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

J Thorac Dis. 2020 Nov;12(11):6954-6965
pubmed: 33282401
Chest. 1999 Mar;115(3):720-4
pubmed: 10084482
Radiology. 2003 Jan;226(1):235-41
pubmed: 12511696
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Mar;14(3):337-342
pubmed: 27927591
Clin Chest Med. 2011 Dec;32(4):799-810
pubmed: 22054887
Onco Targets Ther. 2015 Aug 04;8:2015-22
pubmed: 26346558
Clin Radiol. 2019 May;74(5):338-345
pubmed: 30704666
Biomed Eng Online. 2018 Aug 22;17(1):113
pubmed: 30134902
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018 Jul;22(4):1227-1237
pubmed: 28715341
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jul;201(1):142-6
pubmed: 23789668
Artif Intell Med. 2020 Mar;103:101744
pubmed: 31732411
J Thorac Imaging. 2019 Mar;34(2):75-85
pubmed: 30802231
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Mar;79:117-128
pubmed: 29366586
Radiology. 2011 Dec;261(3):719-32
pubmed: 22095995
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017 Jan;21(1):76-84
pubmed: 28114048
Clin Radiol. 2020 Jan;75(1):38-45
pubmed: 31521323
Radiology. 2017 Aug;284(2):574-582
pubmed: 28436741
J Digit Imaging. 1992 Aug;5(3):190-3
pubmed: 1520746
Radiology. 2020 Jan;294(1):199-209
pubmed: 31714194
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30
pubmed: 31912902
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014 Feb;33(2):233-45
pubmed: 24108713
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2017;10134:
pubmed: 28845077
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Apr;204(4):727-35
pubmed: 25794062
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Oct;189(4):948-55
pubmed: 17885070
Eur Radiol. 2020 Mar;30(3):1359-1368
pubmed: 31748854
Clin Chest Med. 2013 Sep;34(3):365-71
pubmed: 23993809
J Thorac Imaging. 2019 Mar;34(2):86-91
pubmed: 30802232
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016 May;35(5):1160-1169
pubmed: 26955024
Radiology. 2016 Oct;281(1):279-88
pubmed: 27019363
Acad Radiol. 2009 Dec;16(12):1518-30
pubmed: 19896069
Radiology. 2019 Jan;290(1):218-228
pubmed: 30251934
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108
pubmed: 25651787

Auteurs

Alan A Peters (AA)

Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology (DIPR), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Amanda Decasper (A)

Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology (DIPR), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Jaro Munz (J)

Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology (DIPR), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Jeremias Klaus (J)

Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology (DIPR), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Laura I Loebelenz (LI)

Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology (DIPR), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Maximilian Korbinian Michael Hoffner (MKM)

Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology (DIPR), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Cynthia Hourscht (C)

Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology (DIPR), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Johannes T Heverhagen (JT)

Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology (DIPR), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of BioMedical Research, Experimental Radiology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Andreas Christe (A)

Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology (DIPR), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Lukas Ebner (L)

Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology (DIPR), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH