Uncontrolled Extensions of Clinical Trials and the Use of External Controls-Scoping Opportunities and Methods.
Journal
Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
ISSN: 1532-6535
Titre abrégé: Clin Pharmacol Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372741
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2022
01 2022
Historique:
received:
26
03
2021
accepted:
08
06
2021
pubmed:
25
6
2021
medline:
23
2
2022
entrez:
24
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Increased interest in real-world evidence (RWE) for clinical and regulatory decision making and the need to evaluate long-term benefits and risks of pharmaceutical products raise the importance of understanding the use of external controls (ECs) for uncontrolled extensions of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched clinicaltrials.gov from 2009 to 2019 for uncontrolled extensions and assessed the use of ECs in the trial protocol registry and PubMed. We present characteristics of identified uncontrolled extensions, their adoption of ECs, and a qualitative appraisal of published uncontrolled extensions with ECs according to good pharmacoepidemiologic practice. The number of uncontrolled extensions increased slightly across the study period, resulting in a total of 1,115 studies. Most originated from phase III RCTs (62.2%) and specified safety outcomes (61.9% among those with specified outcomes). Most uncontrolled extensions incorporated no control group with only 7 out of 1,115 (0.6%) employing ECs. For those studies with ECs, all involved treatments for rare conditions and assessment of effectiveness. Attempts to balance comparison groups varied from none mentioned to propensity score matching. We noted consistent deficiencies in outcome ascertainment methods and approaches to address attrition bias. The contrast of the large and growing number of uncontrolled extensions with the small number of studies that utilized ECs showed clear opportunities for enhancement in design, measurement, and analysis of uncontrolled extensions to allow causal inferences on long-term treatment effects. As extensions continue to expand within RWE regulatory frameworks, development of guidelines for use of EC with uncontrolled extensions is needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34165790
doi: 10.1002/cpt.2346
pmc: PMC9290853
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
187-199Subventions
Organisme : International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE)
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Références
JAMA. 2007 May 16;297(19):2112-20
pubmed: 17507347
Drug Saf. 2007;30(2):93-105
pubmed: 17253876
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 May;52(3):362-368
pubmed: 29714575
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Sep;54(5):1112-1115
pubmed: 32067187
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 9;352(23):2436-8
pubmed: 15911780
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Nov;29(11):1382-1392
pubmed: 32964514
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2016 Nov;39(6):839-847
pubmed: 27553181
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 May 23;12(1):98
pubmed: 28535791
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Oct;29(10):1228-1235
pubmed: 32162381
Pharm Stat. 2021 Nov;20(6):1002-1016
pubmed: 33908160
Mol Genet Metab. 2018 Feb;123(2):127-134
pubmed: 29248359
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Apr;28(4):439-442
pubmed: 30515910
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 2):1466-70
pubmed: 15361058
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Sep;108(3):653-660
pubmed: 32578196
BMJ. 2018 May 25;361:k1452
pubmed: 29802130
Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Feb;5(2):107-118
pubmed: 28011037
Mol Genet Metab. 2016 Sep;119(1-2):131-43
pubmed: 27380995
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Jan;25(1):2-10
pubmed: 26537534
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;18(6):1075-1078
pubmed: 29085540
Biometrics. 2000 Sep;56(3):779-88
pubmed: 10985216
Ann Neurol. 2016 Feb;79(2):257-71
pubmed: 26573217