Charity Care and Community Benefit in Non-Profit Hospitals: Definition and Requirements.


Journal

Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
ISSN: 1945-7243
Titre abrégé: Inquiry
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0171671

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez: 25 6 2021
pubmed: 26 6 2021
medline: 16 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Policymakers are using different ways to measure the community benefit provided by non-profit hospitals because different policy makers have different policy objectives. We compare 3 commonly used measures of community benefit; examine the correlation across the 3 measures; examine how the distribution of community benefits varies across non-profit hospitals; and compare the factors associated with the level of community benefit for each definition. The main dataset for this study is the Schedule H of IRS Form 990 data for 2017. We merged this data with the 2017 American Hospital Association (AHA), the 2017 CMS Hospital Cost Report, and the 2018 American Community Survey data. The final sample consists of 1904 non-profit hospitals. We define 3 measures of community benefit: (1) Total community benefits: combining all 17 possible measures in the 990 data; (2) Total community benefits less unreimbursed Medicaid care because it reflects a policy choice made by the state; and (3) only charity care. We also subdivided the community benefits into individual and service-based benefit. Gini Coefficients and descriptive analysis show the distribution of 3 types of community benefit measures. On average, hospitals spent 8.1% of their expenses on all community benefits; 4.3% on community benefits less unreimbursed Medicaid; and 1.7% on charity care. The provision of charity care showed more variation (Gini coefficient) than the other 2 measures. Different hospital and geographic characteristics were associated with each definition, suggesting that different types of hospitals place emphasis on different community benefits. When policy makers choose among different definitions of community benefit, they should consider what incentives they want to instill.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34167375
doi: 10.1177/00469580211028180
pmc: PMC8246580
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

469580211028180

Références

Am J Med. 2019 Oct;132(10):1119-1122
pubmed: 30905582
Mod Healthc. 2016 May 9;46(19):12
pubmed: 27483585
J Healthc Manag. 2019 Sep-Oct;64(5):293-314
pubmed: 31498206
N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 18;368(16):1519-27
pubmed: 23594004
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Mar;56(6):1139-53
pubmed: 12600354
AMA J Ethics. 2019 Mar 1;21(3):E273-280
pubmed: 30893042
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017 Nov/Dec;23(6):e1-e9
pubmed: 27997478
Am J Public Health. 2015 May;105(5):914-21
pubmed: 25790412
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Dec;59(12):2409-19
pubmed: 15474197
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:545-57
pubmed: 25785895
Health Serv Res. 2021 May 9;:
pubmed: 33966271
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958017751970
pubmed: 29436247
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009 Feb;34(1):37-61
pubmed: 19234293

Auteurs

Hossein Zare (H)

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Maryland Global Campus, Largo, MD, USA.

Matthew Eisenberg (M)

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Gerard Anderson (G)

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH