Impacts of COVID-19 and social isolation on academic staff and students at universities: a cross-sectional study.
Academic staff
COVID-19
Social isolation
Students
University
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 06 2021
24 06 2021
Historique:
received:
08
10
2020
accepted:
11
05
2021
entrez:
25
6
2021
pubmed:
26
6
2021
medline:
1
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
"The impacts of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the shutdown it triggered at universities across the world, led to a great degree of social isolation among university staff and students. The aim of this study was to identify the perceived consequences of this on staff and their work and on students and their studies at universities. The study used a variety of methods, which involved an on-line survey on the influences of social isolation using a non-probability sampling. More specifically, two techniques were used, namely a convenience sampling (i.e. involving members of the academic community, which are easy to reach by the study team), supported by a snow ball sampling (recruiting respondents among acquaintances of the participants). A total of 711 questionnaires from 41 countries were received. Descriptive statistics were deployed to analyse trends and to identify socio-demographic differences. Inferential statistics were used to assess significant differences among the geographical regions, work areas and other socio-demographic factors related to impacts of social isolation of university staff and students. The study reveals that 90% of the respondents have been affected by the shutdown and unable to perform normal work or studies at their institution for between 1 week to 2 months. While 70% of the respondents perceive negative impacts of COVID 19 on their work or studies, more than 60% of them value the additional time that they have had indoors with families and others. . While the majority of the respondents agree that they suffered from the lack of social interaction and communication during the social distancing/isolation, there were significant differences in the reactions to the lockdowns between academic staff and students. There are also differences in the degree of influence of some of the problems, when compared across geographical regions. In addition to policy actions that may be deployed, further research on innovative methods of teaching and communication with students is needed in order to allow staff and students to better cope with social isolation in cases of new or recurring pandemics.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
"The impacts of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the shutdown it triggered at universities across the world, led to a great degree of social isolation among university staff and students. The aim of this study was to identify the perceived consequences of this on staff and their work and on students and their studies at universities.
METHOD
The study used a variety of methods, which involved an on-line survey on the influences of social isolation using a non-probability sampling. More specifically, two techniques were used, namely a convenience sampling (i.e. involving members of the academic community, which are easy to reach by the study team), supported by a snow ball sampling (recruiting respondents among acquaintances of the participants). A total of 711 questionnaires from 41 countries were received. Descriptive statistics were deployed to analyse trends and to identify socio-demographic differences. Inferential statistics were used to assess significant differences among the geographical regions, work areas and other socio-demographic factors related to impacts of social isolation of university staff and students.
RESULTS
The study reveals that 90% of the respondents have been affected by the shutdown and unable to perform normal work or studies at their institution for between 1 week to 2 months. While 70% of the respondents perceive negative impacts of COVID 19 on their work or studies, more than 60% of them value the additional time that they have had indoors with families and others. .
CONCLUSIONS
While the majority of the respondents agree that they suffered from the lack of social interaction and communication during the social distancing/isolation, there were significant differences in the reactions to the lockdowns between academic staff and students. There are also differences in the degree of influence of some of the problems, when compared across geographical regions. In addition to policy actions that may be deployed, further research on innovative methods of teaching and communication with students is needed in order to allow staff and students to better cope with social isolation in cases of new or recurring pandemics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34167494
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11040-z
pii: 10.1186/s12889-021-11040-z
pmc: PMC8223197
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1213Références
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 9;19(1):40
pubmed: 30626369
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jul;53(1):1-8
pubmed: 28279545
Gerontologist. 2014 Feb;54(1):82-92
pubmed: 24142914
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Feb;134:69-77
pubmed: 33360865
J Health Soc Behav. 2009 Mar;50(1):31-48
pubmed: 19413133
Occup Med (Lond). 2000 Jul;50(5):299-303
pubmed: 10975124
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e243-e244
pubmed: 32275858
J Travel Med. 2020 May 18;27(3):
pubmed: 32181488
Perspect Biol Med. 2003 Summer;46(3 Suppl):S39-52
pubmed: 14563073
Cureus. 2020 Mar 31;12(3):e7492
pubmed: 32368424
Cureus. 2020 Apr 4;12(4):e7541
pubmed: 32377489
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 May;36(COVID19-S4):S108-S110
pubmed: 32582325
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Jun;15(6):797-9
pubmed: 16684182
Acta Biomed. 2018 Jun 07;89(2):302-314
pubmed: 29957768
Public Health Rep. 2019 Nov/Dec;134(6):583-586
pubmed: 31600480
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):e17-e18
pubmed: 32085841
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 23;12(8):e0182145
pubmed: 28832594
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0219663
pubmed: 31318898
J Health Soc Behav. 2010;51 Suppl:S54-66
pubmed: 20943583
Med Teach. 2010;32(5):400-7
pubmed: 20423259
Science. 2020 Jun 12;368(6496):1190-1192
pubmed: 32467332
Psychol Rep. 1985 Dec;57(3 Pt 1):844-6
pubmed: 4080914
Res Aging. 2018 Sep;40(8):715-739
pubmed: 28982271
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 May;7(5):385-387
pubmed: 32353266
Nature. 2020 Apr;580(7802):295-296
pubmed: 32210377
Behav Processes. 2019 Jan;158:59-69
pubmed: 30389595
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):758
pubmed: 32446322
Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2020 Apr;2(2):113-115
pubmed: 32510042
Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2014 Feb 1;8(2):58-72
pubmed: 24839458
BMJ. 2020 Mar 13;368:m1054
pubmed: 32169834
J Pers. 2019 Jun;87(3):455-471
pubmed: 30079518
Psychiatry Res. 2020 May;287:112934
pubmed: 32229390