Nanotechnology and artificial intelligence to enable sustainable and precision agriculture.
Journal
Nature plants
ISSN: 2055-0278
Titre abrégé: Nat Plants
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101651677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
received:
26
03
2020
accepted:
17
05
2021
pubmed:
26
6
2021
medline:
24
9
2021
entrez:
25
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Climate change, increasing populations, competing demands on land for production of biofuels and declining soil quality are challenging global food security. Finding sustainable solutions requires bold new approaches and integration of knowledge from diverse fields, such as materials science and informatics. The convergence of precision agriculture, in which farmers respond in real time to changes in crop growth with nanotechnology and artificial intelligence, offers exciting opportunities for sustainable food production. Coupling existing models for nutrient cycling and crop productivity with nanoinformatics approaches to optimize targeting, uptake, delivery, nutrient capture and long-term impacts on soil microbial communities will enable design of nanoscale agrochemicals that combine optimal safety and functionality profiles.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34168318
doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00946-6
pii: 10.1038/s41477-021-00946-6
doi:
Substances chimiques
Agrochemicals
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
864-876Informations de copyright
© 2021. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Shahzad, A. N., Qureshi, M. K., Wakeel, A. & Misselbrook, T. Crop production in Pakistan and low nitrogen use efficiencies. Nat. Sustain. 2, 1106–1114 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0429-5
Kah, M., Tufenkji, N. & White, J. C. Nano-enabled strategies to enhance crop nutrition and protection. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 532–540 (2019).
pubmed: 31168071
doi: 10.1038/s41565-019-0439-5
Lowry, G. V., Avellan, A. & Gilbertson, L. M. Opportunities and challenges for nanotechnology in the agri-tech revolution. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 517–522 (2019).
pubmed: 31168073
doi: 10.1038/s41565-019-0461-7
Giraldo, J. P., Wu, H., Newkirk, G. M. & Kruss, S. Nanobiotechnology approaches for engineering smart plant sensors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 541–553 (2019).
pubmed: 31168083
doi: 10.1038/s41565-019-0470-6
Kottegoda, N. et al. Urea–hydroxyapatite nanohybrids for slow release of nitrogen. ACS Nano 11, 1214–1221 (2017).
pubmed: 28121129
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b07781
Kabiri, S. et al. Graphene oxide: a new carrier for slow release of plant micronutrients. ACS Appl. Mat. Int. 9, 43325–43335 (2017).
doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b07890
Huang, B. et al. Advances in targeted pesticides with environmentally responsive controlled release by nanotechnology. Nanomaterials 8, 102 (2018).
pmcid: 5853733
doi: 10.3390/nano8020102
Giraldo, J. P. et al. Plant nanobionics approach to augment photosynthesis and biochemical sensing. Nat. Mat. 13, 400–408 (2014).
doi: 10.1038/nmat3890
Simonin, M. et al. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles strongly impact soil microbial function by affecting archaeal nitrifiers. Sci. Rep. 6, 33643 (2016).
pubmed: 27659196
pmcid: 5034236
doi: 10.1038/srep33643
Grün, A.-L. et al. Impact of silver nanoparticles (AgNP) on soil microbial community depending on functionalization, concentration, exposure time, and soil texture. Environ. Sci. Eur. 31, 15 (2019).
doi: 10.1186/s12302-019-0196-y
Hofmann, T. et al. Technology readiness and overcoming barriers to sustainably implement nanotechnology-enabled plant agriculture. Nat. Food 1, 416–425 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-0110-1
Stone, D., Harper, B. J., Lynch, I., Dawson, K. & Harper, S. L. Exposure assessment: recommendations for nanotechnology-based pesticides. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health 16, 467–474 (2010).
pubmed: 21222390
doi: 10.1179/oeh.2010.16.4.467
Kookana, R. S. et al. Nanopesticides: guiding principles for regulatory evaluation of environmental risks. J. Agric. Food Chem. 62, 4227–4240 (2014).
pubmed: 24754346
doi: 10.1021/jf500232f
Zhang, P. et al. Nanomaterial transformation in the soil–plant system: implications for food safety and application in agriculture. Small 16, 2000705 (2020).
doi: 10.1002/smll.202000705
Lombi, E., Donner, E., Dusinska, M. & Wickson, F. A. One health approach to managing the applications and implications of nanotechnologies in agriculture. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 523–531 (2019).
pubmed: 31168074
doi: 10.1038/s41565-019-0460-8
Mouchlis, V. D. et al. Advances in de novo drug design: from conventional to machine learning methods. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 1676 (2021).
pubmed: 33562347
pmcid: 7915729
doi: 10.3390/ijms22041676
Nicolaou, C. A., Brown, N. & Pattichis, C. S. Molecular optimization using computational multi-objective methods. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel. 10, 316–324 (2007).
pubmed: 17554858
Burello, E. & Worth, A. P. A theoretical framework for predicting the oxidative stress potential of oxide nanoparticles. Nanotoxicology 5, 228–235 (2011).
pubmed: 21609138
doi: 10.3109/17435390.2010.502980
Winkler, D. A. Role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in nanosafety. Small 16, 2001883 (2020).
doi: 10.1002/smll.202001883
Karatzas, P. et al. Development of deep learning models for predicting the effects of exposure to engineered nanomaterials on Daphnia magna. Small 16, 2001080 (2020).
doi: 10.1002/smll.202001080
Heermann, D. F., Duke, H. R. & Buchleiter, G. W. ‘User friendly’ software for an integrated water-energy management system for center pivot irrigation. Comput. Electron. Agric. 1, 41–57 (1985).
doi: 10.1016/0168-1699(85)90005-5
White, J. W. & Hamilton, J. H. Irradiance and plant temperature monitor/controller. Comput. Electron. Agric. 1, 95–103 (1985).
doi: 10.1016/0168-1699(85)90009-2
Chlingaryan, A., Sukkarieh, S. & Whelan, B. Machine learning approaches for crop yield prediction and nitrogen status estimation in precision agriculture: a review. Comput. Electron. Agric. 151, 61–69 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.05.012
Jones, J. W. et al. Toward a new generation of agricultural system data, models, and knowledge products: state of agricultural systems science. Agric. Sys. 155, 269–288 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.021
Gumière, S. J. et al. Machine learning vs. physics-based modeling for real-time irrigation management. Front. Water 2, 8 (2020).
doi: 10.3389/frwa.2020.00008
Klein Goldewijk, K., Dekker, S. C. & van Zanden, J. L. Per-capita estimations of long-term historical land use and the consequences for global change research. J. Land Use Sci. 12, 313–337 (2017).
Lassaletta, L., Billen, G., Grizzetti, B., Anglade, J. & Garnier, J. 50 year trends in nitrogen use efficiency of world cropping systems: the relationship between yield and nitrogen input to cropland. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 105011 (2014).
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/105011
van Grinsven, H. J. et al. Losses of ammonia and nitrate from agriculture and their effect on nitrogen recovery in the European Union and the United States between 1900 and 2050. J. Environ. Qual. 44, 356–367 (2015).
pubmed: 26023955
doi: 10.2134/jeq2014.03.0102
Burney, J. A., Davis, S. J. & Lobell, D. B. Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12052–12057 (2010).
pubmed: 20551223
pmcid: 2900707
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914216107
Rockström, J. et al. Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol. Soc. 14, 32 (2009).
doi: 10.5751/ES-03180-140232
Raza, S. et al. Piling up reactive nitrogen and declining nitrogen use efficiency in Pakistan: a challenge not challenged (1961–2013). Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 034012 (2018).
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c5
Schütz, L. et al. Improving crop yield and nutrient use efficiency via biofertilization—a global meta-analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 2204 (2018).
pubmed: 29375594
pmcid: 5770357
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02204
Sharma, L. K. & Bali, S. K. A review of methods to improve nitrogen use efficiency in agriculture. Sustainability 10, 51 (2018).
doi: 10.3390/su10010051
Oerke, E.-C. Crop losses to pests. J. Agric. Sci. 144, 31–43 (2006).
doi: 10.1017/S0021859605005708
Bindraban, P. S., Dimkpa, C., Nagarajan, L., Roy, A. & Rabbinge, R. Revisiting fertilisers and fertilisation strategies for improved nutrient uptake by plants. Biol. Fertil. Soils 51, 897–911 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s00374-015-1039-7
Aktar, W., Sengupta, D. & Chowdhury, A. Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2, 1–12 (2009).
pubmed: 21217838
pmcid: 2984095
doi: 10.2478/v10102-009-0001-7
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Science Breakthroughs to Advance Food and Agricultural Research by 2030 (National Academies Press, 2019).
Parry, M. L. Climate Change and World Agriculture (Routledge, 2019).
Tian, H., Kah, M. & Kariman, K. Are nanoparticles a threat to mycorrhizal and rhizobial symbioses? A critical review. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1660 (2019).
pubmed: 31396182
pmcid: 6668500
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01660
Eymard-Vernain, E. et al. Impact of a model soil microorganism and of its secretome on the fate of silver nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 71–78 (2018).
pubmed: 29211460
doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04071
Xu, X., Bai, B., Wang, H. & Suo, Y. A near-infrared and temperature-responsive pesticide release platform through core–shell polydopamine@ PNIPAm nanocomposites. ACS Appl. Mat. Int. 9, 6424–6432 (2017).
doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b15393
Xu, L. et al. The crucial role of environmental coronas in determining the biological effects of engineered nanomaterials. Small 16, 2003691 (2020).
doi: 10.1002/smll.202003691
Svendsen, C. et al. Key principles and operational practices for improved nanotechnology environmental exposure assessment. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 731–742 (2020).
pubmed: 32807878
doi: 10.1038/s41565-020-0742-1
Cohen, Y., Rallo, R., Liu, R. & Liu, H. H. In silico analysis of nanomaterials hazard and risk. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 802–812 (2013).
pubmed: 23138971
doi: 10.1021/ar300049e
Lamon, L. et al. Grouping of nanomaterials to read-across hazard endpoints: from data collection to assessment of the grouping hypothesis by application of chemoinformatic techniques. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 15, 37 (2018).
pubmed: 30249272
pmcid: 6154922
doi: 10.1186/s12989-018-0273-1
Varsou, D.-D. et al. A safe-by-design tool for functionalised nanomaterials through the Enalos Nanoinformatics cloud platform. Nanoscale Adv. 1, 706–718 (2019).
doi: 10.1039/C8NA00142A
Findlay, M. R., Freitas, D. N., Mobed-Miremadi, M. & Wheeler, K. E. Machine learning provides predictive analysis into silver nanoparticle protein corona formation from physicochemical properties. Environ. Sci. Technol. 5, 64–71 (2018).
Duan, Y. et al. Prediction of protein corona on nanomaterials by machine learning using novel descriptors. Small 17, 100207 (2020).
Ban, Z. et al. Machine learning predicts the functional composition of the protein corona and the cellular recognition of nanoparticles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.USA 117, 10492–10499 (2020).
pubmed: 32332167
pmcid: 7229677
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919755117
Afantitis, A., Melagraki, G., Tsoumanis, A., Valsami-Jones, E. & Lynch, I. Nanoinformatics decision support tool for the virtual screening of gold nanoparticle cellular association using protein corona fingerprints. Nanotoxicology 12, 1148–1165 (2018).
pubmed: 30182778
doi: 10.1080/17435390.2018.1504998
Money, E. S., Reckhow, K. H. & Wiesner, M. R. The use of Bayesian networks for nanoparticle risk forecasting: model formulation and baseline evaluation. Sci. Total Environ. 426, 436–445 (2012).
pubmed: 22521099
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.064
Money, E. S., Barton, L. E., Dawson, J., Reckhow, K. H. & Wiesner, M. R. Validation and sensitivity of the FINE Bayesian network for forecasting aquatic exposure to nano-silver. Sci. Total Environ. 473, 685–691 (2014).
pubmed: 24412914
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.100
Murphy, F. et al. A tractable method for measuring nanomaterial risk using Bayesian networks. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 11, 503 (2016).
pubmed: 27848238
pmcid: 5110451
doi: 10.1186/s11671-016-1724-y
Gerloff, K. et al. The adverse outcome pathway approach in nanotoxicology. J. Comput. Toxcol. 1, 3–11 (2017).
Jeong, J. et al. Developing adverse outcome pathways on silver nanoparticle-induced reproductive toxicity via oxidative stress in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans using a Bayesian network model. Nanotoxicology 12, 1182–1197 (2018).
pubmed: 30663905
doi: 10.1080/17435390.2018.1529835
Afantitis, A., Tsoumanis, A. & Melagraki, G. J. C. M. C. Enalos suite of tools: enhancing cheminformatics and nanoinformatics through KNIME. Curr. Med. Chem. 27, 6523–6535 (2020).
pubmed: 32718281
doi: 10.2174/0929867327666200727114410
Gajewicz, A. What if the number of nanotoxicity data is too small for developing predictive nano-QSAR models? An alternative read-across based approach for filling data gaps. Nanoscale 9, 8435–8448 (2017).
pubmed: 28604902
doi: 10.1039/C7NR02211E
Lee, B. et al. Statistical characterization of the morphologies of nanoparticles through machine learning based electron microscopy image analysis. ACS Nano 14, 17125–17133 (2020).
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c06809
Varsou, D. D. et al. Zeta‐potential read‐across model utilizing nanodescriptors extracted via the nanoxtract image analysis tool available on the enalos nanoinformatics cloud platform. Small 16, 1906588 (2020).
doi: 10.1002/smll.201906588
Papadiamantis, A. G. et al. Predicting cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles using Isalos Analytics platform. Nanomaterials 10, 2017 (2020).
pmcid: 7601995
doi: 10.3390/nano10102017
Pan, Y. et al. Nano-QSAR modeling for predicting the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles using novel descriptors. RSC Adv. 6, 25766–25775 (2016).
doi: 10.1039/C6RA01298A
Bora, T. et al. Modeling nanomaterial physical properties: theory and simulation. Int. J. Smart Nano Mat. 10, 116–143 (2018).
doi: 10.1080/19475411.2018.1541935
Afantitis, A. et al. NanoSolveIT Project: Driving nanoinformatics research to develop innovative and integrated tools for in silico nanosafety assessment. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 18, 583–602 (2020).
pubmed: 32226594
pmcid: 7090366
doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.02.023
Winkler, D. A. Recent advances, and unresolved issues, in the application of computational modelling to the prediction of the biological effects of nanomaterials. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 299, 96–100 (2016).
pubmed: 26723909
doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2015.12.016
McManus, P. et al. Rhizosphere interactions between copper oxide nanoparticles and wheat root exudates in a sand matrix: influences on copper bioavailability and uptake. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 37, 2619–2632 (2018).
pubmed: 29978493
doi: 10.1002/etc.4226
Zhang, P. et al. Plant species-dependent transformation and translocation of ceria nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Nano 6, 60–67 (2019).
doi: 10.1039/C8EN01089G
De Willigen, P. & Neeteson, J. Comparison of six simulation models for the nitrogen cycle in the soil. Fert. Res. 8, 157–171 (1985).
doi: 10.1007/BF01048899
Pathak, H. et al. Modelling the quantitative evaluation of soil nutrient supply, nutrient use efficiency, and fertilizer requirements of wheat in India. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 65, 105–113 (2003).
doi: 10.1023/A:1022177231332
Janssen, B. H. Simple models and concepts as tools for the study of sustained soil productivity in long-term experiments. II. Crop nutrient equivalents, balanced supplies of available nutrients, and NPK triangles. Plant Soil 339, 17–33 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0590-0
Furxhi, I. et al. Application of Bayesian networks in determining nanoparticle-induced cellular outcomes using transcriptomics. Nanotoxicology 13, 827–848 (2019).
pubmed: 31140895
doi: 10.1080/17435390.2019.1595206
Detailed Review Paper on Amphibian Metamorphosis Assay for the Detection of Thyroid Active Substances OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 46 (OECD, 2004).
Kar, S., Roy, K., Leszczynski, J. in Advances in QSAR Modeling (ed. Roy, K.) 203–302 (Springer, 2017).
Tari, F. A Bayesian network for predicting yield response of winter wheat to fungicide programmes. Comput. Electron Agric. 15, 111–121 (1996).
doi: 10.1016/0168-1699(96)00011-7
Krouk, G., Lingeman, J., Colon, A. M., Coruzzi, G. & Shasha, D. Gene regulatory networks in plants: learning causality from time and perturbation. Genome Biol. 14, 123 (2013).
pubmed: 23805876
pmcid: 3707030
doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-123
Ohyanagi, H. et al. Plant Omics Data Center: an integrated web repository for interspecies gene expression networks with NLP-based curation. Plant Cell Physiol. 56, e9 (2015).
pubmed: 25505034
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu188
Lum, G., Meinken, J., Orr, J., Frazier, S. & Min, X. J. PlantSecKB: the plant secretome and subcellular proteome knowledgebase. Comput. Mol. Biol. 4, 1–17 (2014).
Maggi, F., Tang, F. H., la Cecilia, D. & McBratney, A. PEST-CHEMGRIDS, global gridded maps of the top 20 crop-specific pesticide application rates from 2015 to 2025. Sci. Data 6, 170 (2019).
pubmed: 31515508
pmcid: 6761121
doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0169-4
Liakos, K. G., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S. & Bochtis, D. Machine learning in agriculture: a review. Sensors 18, 2674 (2018).
doi: 10.3390/s18082674
pmcid: 6111295
Ha, M. K. et al. Toxicity classification of oxide nanomaterials: effects of data gap filling and PChem score-based screening approaches. Sci. Rep. 8, 3141 (2018).
pubmed: 29453389
pmcid: 5816655
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21431-9
Liang, S. et al. Modeling crop yield and nitrogen use efficiency in wheat and maize production systems under future climate change. Nutr. Cycl. Agro. 115, 117–136 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s10705-019-10013-4
Liu, Y. et al. Modelling field scale spatial variation in water run-off, soil moisture, N
pubmed: 29615828
pmcid: 5777021
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.11.029
Sundaramoorthi, D., Dong, L. Machine-learning-based simulation for estimating parameters in portfolio optimization: empirical application to soybean variety selection. SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3412648 (2019).
Vinuesa, R. et al. The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Comm. 11, 233 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y
Afantitis, A., Melagraki, G., Tsoumanis, A., Valsami-Jones, E. & Lynch, I. A nanoinformatics decision support tool for the virtual screening of gold nanoparticle cellular association using protein corona fingerprints. Nanotoxicology 12, 1148–1165 (2018).
pubmed: 30182778
doi: 10.1080/17435390.2018.1504998
Nendza, M., Dittrich, B., Wenzel, A. & Klein, W. Predictive QSAR models for estimating ecotoxic hazard of plant-protecting agents: target and non-target toxicity. Sci. Total Environ. 109, 527–535 (1991).
pubmed: 1815371
doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(91)90206-T
Kaddi, C. D., Phan, J. H. & Wang, M. D. Computational nanomedicine: modeling of nanoparticle-mediated hyperthermal cancer therapy. Nanomedicine 8, 1323–1333 (2013).
pubmed: 23914967
doi: 10.2217/nnm.13.117
Kumar, P., Khan, R. A., Choonara, Y. E. & Pillay, V. A prospective overview of the essential requirements in molecular modeling for nanomedicine design. Future Med. Chem. 5, 929–946 (2013).
pubmed: 23682569
doi: 10.4155/fmc.13.67
Yang, Y. et al. Deep learning for in vitro prediction of pharmaceutical formulations. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 9, 177–185 (2019).
pubmed: 30766789
doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2018.09.010
Papadiamantis, A. G. et al. Metadata stewardship in nanosafety research: community-driven organisation of metadata schemas to support FAIR nanoscience data. Nanomaterials 10, 2033 (2020).
pmcid: 7602672
doi: 10.3390/nano10102033
Martinez, D. S. T. et al. Effect of the albumin corona on the toxicity of combined graphene oxide and cadmium to Daphnia magna and integration of the datasets into the nanocommons knowledge base. Nanomaterials 10, 1936 (2020).
pmcid: 7599915
doi: 10.3390/nano10101936
Hardy, A. et al. Guidance on risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain: part 1, human and animal health. EFSA J. 16, 5327 (2018).
Alsharif, S. A., Power, D., Rouse, I. & Lobaskin, V. In silico prediction of protein adsorption energy on titanium dioxide and gold nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 10, 1967 (2020).
pmcid: 7601895
doi: 10.3390/nano10101967
Hendren, C. O., Lowry, G. V., Unrine, J. M. & Wiesner, M. R. A functional assay-based strategy for nanomaterial risk forecasting. Sci. Total Envrion. 536, 1029–1037 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.100
Turner, A. A., Rogers, N. M., Geitner, N. K. & Wiesner, M. R. Nanoparticle affinity for natural soils: a functional assay for determining particle attachment efficiency in complex systems. Environ. Sci. Nano 7, 1719–1729 (2020).
doi: 10.1039/D0EN00019A
Zhao, L. et al. CeO
pubmed: 24611936
doi: 10.1021/jf405476u
Wang, Q., Ma, X., Zhang, W., Pei, H. & Chen, Y. The impact of cerium oxide nanoparticles on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and its implications for food safety. Metallomics 4, 1105–1112 (2012).
pubmed: 22986766
doi: 10.1039/c2mt20149f
Tan, W. et al. Effects of the exposure of TiO
pubmed: 29705436
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.263
Hu, X. et al. Graphene oxide amplifies the phytotoxicity of arsenic in wheat. Sci. Rep. 4, 6122 (2014).
pubmed: 25134726
pmcid: 4137339
doi: 10.1038/srep06122
De La Torre-Roche, R. et al. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes and C
doi: 10.1021/es4034809
Reinsch, B. et al. Sulfidation of silver nanoparticles decreases Escherichia coli growth inhibition. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 6992–7000 (2012).
pubmed: 22296331
doi: 10.1021/es203732x
Hou, W.-C. et al. Photochemical transformation of graphene oxide in sunlight. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 3435–3443 (2015).
pubmed: 25671674
doi: 10.1021/es5047155
Dale, A. L. et al. Modeling nanomaterial environmental fate in aquatic systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 2587–2593 (2015).
pubmed: 25611674
doi: 10.1021/es505076w
Silva, V. et al. Pesticide residues in European agricultural soils—a hidden reality unfolded. Sci. Total Environ. 653, 1532–1545 (2019).
pubmed: 30759587
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.441
Baştanlar, Y., Özuysal, M. in miRNomics: MicroRNA Biology and Computational Analysis (eds Yousef, M. & Allmer, J.) 105–128 (Springer, 2014).
Nemes, A., Roberts, R. T., Rawls, W. J., Pachepsky, Y. A. & Van Genuchten, M. T. Software to estimate −33 and −1500 kPa soil water retention using the non-parametric k-nearest neighbor technique. Environ. Model. Softw. 23, 254–255 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.05.018
Nemes, A., Rawls, W. J. & Pachepsky, Y. A. Use of the nonparametric nearest neighbor approach to estimate soil hydraulic properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 70, 327–336 (2006).
doi: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0128
Pedroso, M., Taylor, J., Tisseyre, B., Charnomordic, B. & Guillaume, S. A segmentation algorithm for the delineation of agricultural management zones. Comput. Electron Agric. 70, 199–208 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2009.10.007
Bi, X. et al. Quantitative resolution of nanoparticle sizes using single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry with the k-means clustering algorithm. J. Anal. Spectrom. 29, 1630–1639 (2014).
doi: 10.1039/C4JA00109E
Bu, F. & Wang, X. A smart agriculture IoT system based on deep reinforcement learning. Future Gen. Comput. Sys. 99, 500–507 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.future.2019.04.041
Sun, B. & Barnard, A. S. Visualising multi-dimensional structure/property relationships with machine learning. J. Phys. Mat. 2, 034003 (2019).
doi: 10.1088/2515-7639/ab0faa
Lamon, L., Aschberger, K., Asturiol, D., Richarz, A. & Worth, A. Grouping of nanomaterials to read-across hazard endpoints: a review. Nanotoxicology 13, 100–118 (2019).
pubmed: 30182776
doi: 10.1080/17435390.2018.1506060