The knowledge about patient safety among undergraduate nurse students in Cyprus and Greece: a comparative study.
Nursing students
curriculum
patient safety
undergraduate education
Journal
BMC nursing
ISSN: 1472-6955
Titre abrégé: BMC Nurs
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088683
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Jun 2021
25 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
27
09
2020
accepted:
25
05
2021
entrez:
26
6
2021
pubmed:
27
6
2021
medline:
27
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Patient safety movement contributed to the reduction of preventable adverse events associated with health care. Although patient safety issues have received the attention of educators in the health care studies, there is evidence that in nursing education and the associated curricula it is not well-incorporated. This may not allow students to acquire scientific knowledge and develop strong competencies to assure patient safety throughout their professional life. The aım of the study was the exploration of the undergraduate nursing student perspectives regarding knowledge received during their training about patient safety-related issues. A descriptive comparative study was conducted with three and four-year undergraduate nursing students from the Cyprus Republic (n = 243) and Greece (n = 367). All students were surveyed using the Health Professional Education Patient Safety Survey (H-PEPSS) to describe students' knowledge in the classroom and clinical setting. Students' Knowledge about patient safety was expressed significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the classroom (mean = 4.0) than the clinical setting (3.7) (1-5 scale). The knowledge in the dimension "clinical aspects" received the highest score and "working in teams" received the lowest. Also, differences were recorded between countries wıth Cypriot students reporting hıgher level of knowledge than the Greek students in most of the dimensions. CONCLUSıON: The findings revealed the gap between theory and practice and the need for collaboration between the two settings. Also, students reported relatively higher knowledge with regards to the technical aspects of patient safety. Still, they were less knowledgable about the sociocultural aspects of the patient, such as working in teams.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Patient safety movement contributed to the reduction of preventable adverse events associated with health care. Although patient safety issues have received the attention of educators in the health care studies, there is evidence that in nursing education and the associated curricula it is not well-incorporated. This may not allow students to acquire scientific knowledge and develop strong competencies to assure patient safety throughout their professional life. The aım of the study was the exploration of the undergraduate nursing student perspectives regarding knowledge received during their training about patient safety-related issues.
METHODS
METHODS
A descriptive comparative study was conducted with three and four-year undergraduate nursing students from the Cyprus Republic (n = 243) and Greece (n = 367). All students were surveyed using the Health Professional Education Patient Safety Survey (H-PEPSS) to describe students' knowledge in the classroom and clinical setting.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Students' Knowledge about patient safety was expressed significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the classroom (mean = 4.0) than the clinical setting (3.7) (1-5 scale). The knowledge in the dimension "clinical aspects" received the highest score and "working in teams" received the lowest. Also, differences were recorded between countries wıth Cypriot students reporting hıgher level of knowledge than the Greek students in most of the dimensions. CONCLUSıON: The findings revealed the gap between theory and practice and the need for collaboration between the two settings. Also, students reported relatively higher knowledge with regards to the technical aspects of patient safety. Still, they were less knowledgable about the sociocultural aspects of the patient, such as working in teams.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34172054
doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00610-6
pii: 10.1186/s12912-021-00610-6
pmc: PMC8234646
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
110Références
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020 Mar;25(1):75-93
pubmed: 31392511
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2015 Jun;12(3):154-64
pubmed: 25872460
Lancet. 2014 May 24;383(9931):1824-30
pubmed: 24581683
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Feb 19;88:104372
pubmed: 32143174
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2014 Sep 19;7:381-8
pubmed: 25285012
Nurse Educ Pract. 2014 Nov;14(6):722-8
pubmed: 25306396
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Jun;71:89-96
pubmed: 28364581
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014 Mar;46(2):125-33
pubmed: 24118728
J Res Nurs. 2019 Jun;24(3-4):149-164
pubmed: 34394520
Curationis. 2019 Jul 18;42(1):e1-e7
pubmed: 31368313
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Mar;23(3):257-64
pubmed: 24299734
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jul;66:82-89
pubmed: 29684837
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Feb;34(2):277-84
pubmed: 23726756
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Feb;50(2):253-63
pubmed: 23116681
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Oct;166:186-194
pubmed: 27567092
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 May;52(5):930-8
pubmed: 25698119
Med Care Res Rev. 2015 Dec;72(6):643-64
pubmed: 26062612
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Dec;15(6):437-42
pubmed: 17142595
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Dec;100:103414
pubmed: 31655385
Nurs Outlook. 2007 May-Jun;55(3):122-31
pubmed: 17524799
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):147-54
pubmed: 23178859
ISRN Nurs. 2012;2012:401358
pubmed: 22523700
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Oct;24(19-20):2954-64
pubmed: 26216053
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Aug;21(8):676-84
pubmed: 22562876
J Clin Nurs. 2019 May;28(9-10):1771-1781
pubmed: 30667103
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2014 Apr 02;11:
pubmed: 24695045
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Feb;34(2):265-70
pubmed: 23116928
Med Teach. 2015;37(6):572-7
pubmed: 25244065
Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 May;37:132-140
pubmed: 31153130
JAMA. 2003 Sep 24;290(12):1617-23
pubmed: 14506121
Health Syst Transit. 2017 Sep;19(5):1-166
pubmed: 29972131
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Feb;50(2):230-9
pubmed: 23084600
SAGE Open Nurs. 2020 Jun 08;6:2377960820930134
pubmed: 33415283
Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 Jan;16(1):209-16
pubmed: 26344616
Nurs Health Sci. 2016 Jun;18(2):163-71
pubmed: 26306563
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jan;27(1-2):31-47
pubmed: 28252838
Nurs Outlook. 2009 Nov-Dec;57(6):304-12
pubmed: 19942031
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Apr;51:48-56
pubmed: 28126688
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):768-70
pubmed: 10720363
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Feb;37:66-70
pubmed: 26673614
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Jun;77:1-5
pubmed: 30877869
Am J Surg. 2015 Dec;210(6):978-82
pubmed: 26522775
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 25;10:2183
pubmed: 31607997
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2014 Aug 05;7:341-7
pubmed: 25125983
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Dec;72(12):2966-2979
pubmed: 27222204
Nurse Educ Pract. 2008 Jul;8(4):239-48
pubmed: 17945535
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2015 Oct;9(4):418-26
pubmed: 26715921
J Prof Nurs. 2015 Sep-Oct;31(5):432-9
pubmed: 26428349
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22(10):843-54
pubmed: 23728120
Nurs Health Sci. 2015 Jun;17(2):236-42
pubmed: 25377993
J Nurs Educ. 2014 Jan 1;53(1):7-13
pubmed: 24308538
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Feb;34(2):271-6
pubmed: 24169443
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Aug;35(8):926-34
pubmed: 25959704
J Interprof Care. 2016 Nov;30(6):732-738
pubmed: 27705029
BMC Nurs. 2016 Jul 19;15:44
pubmed: 27436992
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):32
pubmed: 32005224
Int Nurs Rev. 2011 Dec;58(4):434-42
pubmed: 22092321
Nurs Forum. 2019 Jul;54(3):414-424
pubmed: 31056754
J Nurs Educ. 2012 Sep;51(9):526-31
pubmed: 22766076
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 May;33(5):475-80
pubmed: 22658213
J Allied Health. 2018 Summer;47(2):141-146
pubmed: 29868700