Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Hearing Implants - Follow-up on Prevalence and Complications.
Journal
Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
ISSN: 1537-4505
Titre abrégé: Otol Neurotol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100961504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 10 2021
01 10 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
27
6
2021
medline:
8
10
2021
entrez:
26
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To examine the number of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations performed in patients with hearing implants and to quantify side effects or complications related to this procedure. Questionnaire. Tertiary referral center, academic hospital. One thousand four hundred sixty-onepatients with an implanted hearing system. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire either during a visit to the clinic (304) or by mail contact (1,157) between February 2018 and March 2019. Number of examinations by means of MRI per patient and number of side effects or complications. A total of 711 questionnaires were returned. After excluding nonvalid information on the questionnaire, 12.8% of patients were identified who had undergone an MRI after having received their hearing implant. Within this group of 91 patients, the most common precaution undertaken was a head bandage (69%). Side effects were mainly pain (37%), followed by anxiety (15%) and tinnitus (9%). The MRI had to be aborted in 14% and dislocation of the magnet occurred in 7% of examinations. Our data indicate that patients undergoing hearing implant surgery need better information about the limitations and requirements of MRI. The occurrence of side effects is likely as only half of the patients in our study group were completely free of symptoms. Dislocation of the implant magnet was observed in several cases, hence patients and physicians need to be educated about this potential complication.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34172665
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003249
pii: 00129492-202110000-00011
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1334-1341Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors disclose no funding and conflicts of interest.
Références
Shew M, Wichova H, Lin J, Ledbetter LN, Staecker H. Magnetic resonance imaging with cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants: are we truly practicing MRI safety? Laryngoscope 2019; 129:482–489.
Edmonson HA, Carlson ML, Patton AC, Watson RE. MR imaging and cochlear implants with retained internal magnets: reducing artifacts near highly inhomogeneous magnetic fields. Radiographics 2018; 38:94–106.
Fallpauschalenbezogene Krankenhausstatistik (DRG-Statistik) Operationen und Prozeduren der vollstationären Patientinnen und Patienten in Krankenhäusern 2005 (4-Steller). Bundesamt für Statistik.
Fallpauschalenbezogene Krankenhausstatistik (DRG-Statistik) Operationen und Prozeduren der vollstationären Patientinnen und Patienten in Krankenhäusern 2017 (4-Steller). Bundesamt für Statistik.
OECD. Health at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. 2019; Paris: OECD Publishing, DOI 10.1787/4dd50c09-en.
Carlson ML, Neff BA, Link MJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging with cochlear implant magnet in place: safety and imaging quality. Otol Neurotol 2015; 36:965–971.
Kim B, Kim J, Park J, Kim S, Kim H, Choi J. Adverse events and discomfort during magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant recipients. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 141:45–52.
Hassepass F, Stabenau V, Arndt S, et al. Magnet dislocation: an increasing and serious complication following MRI in patients with cochlear implants. RoFo 2014; 186:680–685.
Hassepass F, Stabenau V, Maier W, et al. Revision surgery due to magnet dislocation in cochlear implant patients: an emerging complication. Otol Neurotol 2014; 35:29–34.
Broomfield SJ, Cruz M, Gibson WP. Cochlear implants and magnetic resonance scans: a case report and review. Cochlear Implants Int 2013; 14:51–55.
Todt I, Wagner J, Goetze R, Scholz S, Seidl R, Ernst A. MRI scanning in patients implanted with a Vibrant Soundbridge. Laryngoscope 2011; 121:1532–1535.
Deneuve S, Loundon N, Leboulanger N, Rouillon I, Garabedian EN. Cochlear implant magnet displacement during magnetic resonance imaging. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29:789–790.
Majdani O, Leinung M, Rau T, et al. Demagnetization of cochlear implants and temperature changes in 3.0 T MRI environment. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 139:833–839.
Leinung M, Loth A, Gröger M, et al. Cochlear implant magnet dislocation after MRI: surgical management and outcome. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 2020; 277:1297–1304.
Cass N, Honce J, O’Dell A, et al. First MRI with new cochlear implant with rotatable internal magnet system and proposal for standardization of reporting magnet-related artifact size. Otol Neurotol 2019; 40:883–891.
Tam Y, Lee J, Gair J, et al. Performing MRI scans on cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant recipients: review of 14.5 years experience. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41:e556–e562.
Grupe G, Wagner J, Hofmann S, et al. Prevalence and complications of MRI scans of cochlear implant patients: English version. HNO 2017; 65: (Suppl 1): 35–40.
Nospes S, Brockmann MA, Läßig A. MRT bei Patienten mit Hörimplantaten mit Magnetausstattung – ein Update. Der Radiologe 2019; 59:48–56.