Evidence accumulation and associated error-related brain activity as computationally-informed prospective predictors of substance use in emerging adulthood.


Journal

Psychopharmacology
ISSN: 1432-2072
Titre abrégé: Psychopharmacology (Berl)
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7608025

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Historique:
received: 07 10 2020
accepted: 27 05 2021
pubmed: 27 6 2021
medline: 29 9 2021
entrez: 26 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Substance use peaks during the developmental period known as emerging adulthood (ages 18-25), but not every individual who uses substances during this period engages in frequent or problematic use. Although individual differences in neurocognition appear to predict use severity, mechanistic neurocognitive risk factors with clear links to both behavior and neural circuitry have yet to be identified. Here, we aim to do so with an approach rooted in computational psychiatry, an emerging field in which formal models are used to identify candidate biobehavioral dimensions that confer risk for psychopathology. We test whether lower efficiency of evidence accumulation (EEA), a computationally characterized individual difference variable that drives performance on the go/no-go and other neurocognitive tasks, is a risk factor for substance use in emerging adults. In an fMRI substudy within a sociobehavioral longitudinal study (n = 106), we find that lower EEA and reductions in a robust neural-level correlate of EEA (error-related activations in salience network structures) measured at ages 18-21 are both prospectively related to greater substance use during ages 22-26, even after adjusting for other well-known risk factors. Results from Bayesian model comparisons corroborated inferences from conventional hypothesis testing and provided evidence that both EEA and its neuroimaging correlates contain unique predictive information about substance use involvement. These findings highlight EEA as a computationally characterized neurocognitive risk factor for substance use during a critical developmental period, with clear links to both neuroimaging measures and well-established formal theories of brain function.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34173032
doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-05885-w
pii: 10.1007/s00213-021-05885-w
pmc: PMC8452274
mid: NIHMS1738120
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2629-2644

Subventions

Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : K01 DA044270
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH107741
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAAA NIH HHS
ID : T32 AA007477
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAAA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AA025790
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAAA NIH HHS
ID : K01 AA024804
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAAA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AA007065
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAAA NIH HHS
ID : K01 AA027558
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Abler B, Walter H, Erk S, Kammerer H, Spitzer M (2006) Prediction error as a linear function of reward probability is coded in human nucleus accumbens. Neuroimage 31(2):790–795
pubmed: 16487726 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.001
Adams RA, Huys QJ, Roiser JP (2016) Computational psychiatry: towards a mathematically informed understanding of mental illness. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 87(1):53–63
pubmed: 26157034
Arbabshirani MR, Plis S, Sui J, Calhoun VD (2017) Single subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: promises and pitfalls. Neuroimage 145:137–165
pubmed: 27012503 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.079
Arnett JJ (2000) Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol 55(5):469
pubmed: 10842426 doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD (2005) An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu Rev Neurosci 28:403–450
pubmed: 16022602 doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709
Casey B, Jones RM, Somerville LH (2011) Braking and accelerating of the adolescent brain. J Res Adolesc 21(1):21–33
pubmed: 21475613 pmcid: 3070306 doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00712.x
Cassey PJ, Gaut G, Steyvers M, Brown SD (2016) A generative joint model for spike trains and saccades during perceptual decision-making. Psychon Bull Rev 23(6):1757–1778. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1056-z
doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1056-z pubmed: 27246091
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016) Excessive drinking is draining the US economy. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Population Health, Atlanta
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). Multiple Cause of Death 1999–2017 on CDC Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER). CDC, National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved November 1, 2019, from  http://wonder.cdc.gov
Clyde MA, Ghosh J, Littman ML (2011) Bayesian adaptive sampling for variable selection and model averaging. J Comput Graph Stat 20(1):80–101
doi: 10.1198/jcgs.2010.09049
Cohen JD, Daw N, Engelhardt B, Hasson U, Li K, Niv Y, Norman KA, Pillow J, Ramadge PJ, Turk-Browne NB, Willke TL (2017) Computational approaches to fMRI analysis. Nat Neurosci 20(3):304–313. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4499
doi: 10.1038/nn.4499 pubmed: 28230848 pmcid: 5457304
Dutilh G, Annis J, Brown SD, Cassey P, Evans NJ, Grasman RP, Hawkins GE, Heathcote A, Holmes WR, Krypotos A-M et al (2019) The quality of response time data inference: a blinded, collaborative assessment of the validity of cognitive models. Psychon Bull Rev 26(4):1051–1069
pubmed: 29450793 doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1417-2
Eisenberg IW, Bissett PG, Enkavi AZ, Li J, MacKinnon DP, Marsch LA, Poldrack RA (2019) Uncovering the structure of self-regulation through data-driven ontology discovery. Nat Commun 10(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10301-1
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10301-1
Endres MJ, Donkin C, Finn PR (2014) An information processing/associative learning account of behavioral disinhibition in externalizing psychopathology. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 22(2):122
pubmed: 24611834 pmcid: 3981894 doi: 10.1037/a0035166
Evans NJ, Steyvers M, Brown SD (2018) Modeling the covariance structure of complex datasets using cognitive models: an application to individual differences and the heritability of cognitive ability. Cogn Sci 42(6):1925–1944
doi: 10.1111/cogs.12627
Florence C, Luo F, Xu L, Zhou C (2016) The economic burden of prescription opioid overdose, abuse and dependence in the United States, 2013. Med Care 54(10):901–906. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000625
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000625 pubmed: 27623005 pmcid: 5975355
Garavan H, Bartsch H, Conway K, Decastro A, Goldstein R, Heeringa S, Jernigan T, Potter A, Thompson W, Zahs D (2018) Recruiting the ABCD sample: design considerations and procedures. Dev Cogn Neurosci 32:16–22
pubmed: 29703560 pmcid: 6314286 doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.004
Gold JI, Shadlen MN (2007) The neural basis of decision making. Annu Rev Neurosci 30:535–74
pubmed: 17600525 doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038
Gomez P, Ratcliff R, Perea M (2007) A model of the go/no-go task. J Exp Psychol Gen 136(3):389
pubmed: 17696690 pmcid: 2701630 doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.389
Heathcote A, Brown SD, Wagenmakers EJ (2015) An introduction to good practices in cognitive modeling. In: Forstmann BU, Wagenmakers EJ (eds) An introduction to model-based cognitive neuroscience. Springer, New York, pp 25–48
Heitzeg MM, Nigg JT, Hardee JE, Soules M, Steinberg D, Zubieta J-K, Zucker RA (2014) Left middle frontal gyrus response to inhibitory errors in children prospectively predicts early problem substance use. Drug Alcohol Depend 141:51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.05.002
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.05.002 pubmed: 24882366 pmcid: 4106478
Hermans EJ, Van Marle HJ, Ossewaarde L, Henckens MJ, Qin S, Van Kesteren MT, Schoots VC, Cousijn H, Rijpkema M, Oostenveld R et al (2011) Stress-related noradrenergic activity prompts large-scale neural network reconfiguration. Science 334(6059):1151–1153
pubmed: 22116887 doi: 10.1126/science.1209603
Huang-Pollock C, Ratcliff R, McKoon G, Shapiro Z, Weigard A, Galloway-Long H (2017) Using the diffusion model to explain cognitive deficits in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Abnorm Child Psychol 45(1):57–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-016-0151-y
doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0151-y pubmed: 27030470 pmcid: 5045756
Huys QJ, Maia TV, Frank MJ (2016) Computational psychiatry as a bridge from neuroscience to clinical applications. Nat Neurosci 19(3):404
pubmed: 26906507 pmcid: 5443409 doi: 10.1038/nn.4238
JASP Team (2020) JASP (Version 0.12.2) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://jasp-stats.org
Karalunas SL, Huang-Pollock CL (2013) Integrating impairments in reaction time and executive function using a diffusion model framework. J Abnorm Child Psychol 41(5):837–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9715-2
doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9715-2 pubmed: 23334775 pmcid: 3679296
Karalunas SL, Geurts HM, Konrad K, Bender S, Nigg JT (2014) Annual research review: reaction time variability in ADHD and autism spectrum disorders: measurement and mechanisms of a proposed trans-diagnostic phenotype. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 55(6):685–710
pubmed: 24628425 pmcid: 4267725 doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12217
Karr JE, Areshenkoff CN, Rast P, Hofer SM, Iverson GL, Garcia-Barrera MA (2018) The unity and diversity of executive functions: a systematic review and re-analysis of latent variable studies. Psychol Bull 144(11):1147–1185. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000160
doi: 10.1037/bul0000160 pubmed: 30080055 pmcid: 6197939
Lê S, Josse J, Husson F et al (2008) FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw 25(1):1–18
doi: 10.18637/jss.v025.i01
Lerche V, von Krause M, Voss A, Frischkorn G, Schubert A-L, Hagemann D (2020) Diffusion modeling and intelligence: drift rates show both domain-general and domain-specific relations with intelligence. J Exp Psychol Gen 149:2207–2249
pubmed: 32378959 doi: 10.1037/xge0000774
Li Y, Clyde MA (2018) Mixtures of g-priors in generalized linear models. J Am Stat Assoc 113(524):1828–1845
doi: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1469992
Liang F, Paulo R, Molina G, Clyde MA, Berger JO (2008) Mixtures of g priors for Bayesian variable selection. J Am Stat Assoc 103(481):410–423
doi: 10.1198/016214507000001337
Ly A, Marsman M, Wagenmakers E-J (2018) Analytic posteriors for Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Stat Neerl 72(1):4–13
pubmed: 29353942 doi: 10.1111/stan.12111
Ly A, Stefan A, van Doorn J, Dablander F, van den Bergh D, Sarafoglou A, ... Wagenmakers EJ (2020) The Bayesian methodology of Sir Harold Jeffreys as a practical alternative to the p value hypothesis test. Comput Brain Behav 3(2):153–161
Mahmood O, Goldenberg D, Thayer R, Migliorini R, Simmons A, Tapert S (2013) Adolescents’ fMRI activation to a response inhibition task predicts future substance use. Addict Behav 38(1):1435–1441
pubmed: 23006248 doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.07.012
Matzke D, Wagenmakers E-J (2009) Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: a diffusion model analysis. Psychon Bull Rev 16(5):798–817. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.798
doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.798 pubmed: 19815782
Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD (2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol 41(1):49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 pubmed: 10945922
Montague PR, Dolan RJ, Friston KJ, Dayan P (2012) Computational psychiatry. Trends Cogn Sci 16(1):72–80
pubmed: 22177032 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.018
National Drug Intelligence Center (2011) National Drug Threat Assessment 2011. United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC. Retrieved November 1, 2019, from  www.justice.gov/archive/ndic/pubs44/44849/44849p.pdf
Norman AL, Pulido C, Squeglia LM, Spadoni AD, Paulus MP, Tapert SF (2011) Neural activation during inhibition predicts initiation of substance use in adolescence. Drug Alcohol Depend 119(3):216–223
pubmed: 21782354 pmcid: 3208054 doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.06.019
Ratcliff R (1978) A theory of memory retrieval. Psychol Rev 85(2):59
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59
Ratcliff R, Smith PL, Brown SD, McKoon G (2016) Diffusion decision model: current issues and history. Trends Cogn Sci 20(4):260–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007 pubmed: 26952739 pmcid: 4928591
Ratcliff R, Huang-Pollock C, McKoon G (2018) Modeling individual differences in the go/no-go task with a diffusion model. Decision 5(1):42–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000065
doi: 10.1037/dec0000065 pubmed: 29404378
Robins LN, Helzer JE, Croughan J, Ratcliff KS (1981) National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule: its history, characteristics, and validity. Arch Gen Psychiatry 38(4):381–389. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290015001
doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290015001 pubmed: 6260053
Rouder JN, Morey RD (2012) Default Bayes factors for model selection in regression. Multivar Behav Res 47(6):877–903
doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.734737
Rouder J, Kumar A, Haaf JM (2019) Why most studies of individual differences with inhibition tasks are bound to fail. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3cjr5
Schmiedek F, Oberauer K, Wilhelm O, Süss H, Wittmann WW (2007) Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. J Exp Psychol Gen 136(3):414–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.414
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.414 pubmed: 17696691
Schubert A-L, Hagemann D, Voss A, Schankin A, Bergmann K (2015) Decomposing the relationship between mental speed and mental abilities. Intelligence 51:28–46
doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2015.05.002
Schubert A-L, Frischkorn G, Hagemann D, Voss A (2016) Trait characteristics of diffusion model parameters. J Intelligence 4(3):7
doi: 10.3390/jintelligence4030007
Schulenberg J, Johnston L, O’Malley P, Bachman J, Miech R, Patrick M (2019) Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2018: Volume II, college students and adults ages 19–60. Institute for Social Research. The University of Michigan. Retrieved November 1, 2019, from  http://monitoringthefuture.org/pubs.html#monographs
Scott JG, Berger JO et al (2010) Bayes and empirical-Bayes multiplicity adjustment in the variable-selection problem. Ann Stat 38(5):2587–2619
doi: 10.1214/10-AOS792
Seeley WW, Menon V, Schatzberg AF, Keller J, Glover GH, Kenna H, Reiss AL, Greicius MD (2007) Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J Neurosci 27(9):2349–2356. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007 pubmed: 17329432 pmcid: 2680293
Shulman EP, Smith AR, Silva K, Icenogle G, Duell N, Chein J, Steinberg L (2016) The dual systems model: review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation. Dev Cogn Neurosci 17:103–117
pubmed: 26774291 doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.010
Singmann H, Brown S, Gretton M, Heathcote A, Voss A, Voss J, Terry A (2016) rtdists: response time distributions. R Package Version 0.4–9. Retrieved June 1, 2016, from  http://CRAN.R-Project.Org/Package=Rtdists
Smith PL, Ratcliff R (2004) Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends Neurosci 27(3):161–168
pubmed: 15036882 doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.01.006
Smith JL, Mattick RP, Jamadar SD, Iredale JM (2014) Deficits in behavioural inhibition in substance abuse and addiction: a meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend 145:1–33
pubmed: 25195081 doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.08.009
Stafford T, Pirrone A, Croucher M, Krystalli A (2020) Quantifying the benefits of using decision models with response time and accuracy data. Behav Res Methods 52:2142–2155
pubmed: 32232739 pmcid: 7575468 doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01372-w
Sui J, Jiang R, Bustillo J, Calhoun V (2020) Neuroimaging-based individualized prediction of cognition and behavior for mental disorders and health: methods and promises. Biol Psychiatry 88(11):818–828
pubmed: 32336400 doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.02.016 pmcid: 7483317
Verbruggen F, McLaren IP, Chambers CD (2014) Banishing the control homunculi in studies of action control and behavior change. Perspect Psychol Sci 9(5):497–524
pubmed: 25419227 pmcid: 4232338 doi: 10.1177/1745691614526414
Voss A, Nagler M, Lerche V (2013) Diffusion models in experimental psychology: a practical introduction. Exp Psychol 60(6):385
pubmed: 23895923 doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000218
Wang X-J, Krystal JH (2014) Computational psychiatry. Neuron 84(3):638–654
pubmed: 25442941 pmcid: 4255477 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.018
Weigard A, Soules M, Ferris B, Zucker RA, Sripada C, Heitzeg M (2020) Cognitive modeling informs interpretation of go/no-go task-related neural activations and their links to externalizing psychopathology. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging 5(5):530–541
Wetherill RR, Squeglia LM, Yang TT, Tapert SF (2013) A longitudinal examination of adolescent response inhibition: neural differences before and after the initiation of heavy drinking. Psychopharmacology 230(4):663–671
pubmed: 23832422 doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3198-2
Wiecki TV, Poland J, Frank MJ (2015) Model-based cognitive neuroscience approaches to computational psychiatry: clustering and classification. Clinical Psychological Science 3(3):378–399
doi: 10.1177/2167702614565359
Wiecki TV, Antoniades CA, Stevenson A, Kennard C, Borowsky B, Owen G, Leavitt B, Roos R, Durr A, Tabrizi SJ, Frank MJ (2016) A computational cognitive biomarker for early-stage Huntington’s disease. PLoS ONE 11(2):e0148409. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148409
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148409 pubmed: 26872129 pmcid: 4752511
Xu X, Bishop EE, Kennedy SM, Simpson SA, Pechacek TF (2015) Annual healthcare spending attributable to cigarette smoking: an update. Am J Prev Med 48(3):326–333
pubmed: 25498551 doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.10.012
Yarkoni T, Poldrack R, Nichols T, Van Essen D, Wager T (2016) Neurosynth. http://neurosynth.org/ . Accessed 4 June 2019
Yoo K, Rosenberg MD, Noble S, Scheinost D, Constable RT, Chun MM (2019) Multivariate approaches improve the reliability and validity of functional connectivity and prediction of individual behaviors. Neuroimage 197:212–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.060
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.060 pubmed: 31039408
Ziegler S, Pedersen ML, Mowinckel AM, Biele G (2016) Modelling ADHD: a review of ADHD theories through their predictions for computational models of decision-making and reinforcement learning. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 71:633–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.002
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.002 pubmed: 27608958
Zucker RA, Fitzgerald HE, Noll RB (1990) Drinking and drug history. Unpublished questionnaire, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
Zucker RA, Ellis DA, Fitzgerald HE, Bingham CR, Sanford K (1996) Other evidence for at least two alcoholisms II: Life course variation in antisociality and heterogeneity of alcoholic outcome. Dev Psychopathol 8(4):831–848. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400007458
doi: 10.1017/S0954579400007458

Auteurs

Alexander S Weigard (AS)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Rachel Upjohn Building, 4250 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. asweigar@med.umich.edu.

Sarah J Brislin (SJ)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Rachel Upjohn Building, 4250 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Lora M Cope (LM)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Rachel Upjohn Building, 4250 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Jillian E Hardee (JE)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Rachel Upjohn Building, 4250 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Meghan E Martz (ME)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Rachel Upjohn Building, 4250 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Alexander Ly (A)

Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Machine Learning Group, Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Robert A Zucker (RA)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Rachel Upjohn Building, 4250 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Chandra Sripada (C)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Rachel Upjohn Building, 4250 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Mary M Heitzeg (MM)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Rachel Upjohn Building, 4250 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH