Traditional vs Extended Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation Based on the Continuous Care Model for Patients Who Have Undergone Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in a Middle-Income Country: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Aged
Anxiety
/ epidemiology
Cardiac Rehabilitation
/ methods
Coronary Artery Bypass
/ psychology
Depression
/ epidemiology
Female
Healthy Lifestyle
Humans
Iran
Male
Mental Health
Middle Aged
Mobile Applications
Patient Education as Topic
/ methods
Physical Functional Performance
Physical Therapy Modalities
Quality of Life
Risk Factors
Severity of Illness Index
Socioeconomic Factors
Time Factors
Cardiac rehabilitation
Continuity of patient care
Coronary artery bypass
Global health
Health services accessibility
Model, nursing
Quality of life
Randomized controlled trial
Rehabilitation
Secondary prevention
Telemedicine
Journal
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1532-821X
Titre abrégé: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985158R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
01
02
2021
revised:
23
03
2021
accepted:
23
04
2021
pubmed:
28
6
2021
medline:
20
11
2021
entrez:
27
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare traditional (1-month supervised) vs hybrid cardiac rehabilitation (CR; usual care) with an additional 3 months offered remotely based on the continuous care model (intervention) in patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Randomized controlled trial, with blinded outcome assessment. A major heart center in a middle-income country. Of 107 eligible patients who were referred to CR during the period of study, 82.2% (N=88) were enrolled (target sample size). Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 (concealed; 44 per parallel arm). There was 92.0% retention. After CR, participants were given a mobile application and communicated biweekly with the nurse from months 1-4 to control risk factors. Quality of life (QOL, Short Form-36, primary outcome); functional capacity (treadmill test); and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale were evaluated pre-CR, after 1 month, and 3 months after CR (end of intervention), as well as rehospitalization. The analysis of variance interaction effects for the physical and mental component summary scores of QOL were <.001, favoring intervention (per protocol); there were also significant increases from pre-CR to 1 month, and from 1 month to the final assessment in the intervention arm (P<.001), with change in the control arm only to 1 month. The effect sizes were 0.115 and 0.248, respectively. Similarly, the interaction effect for functional capacity was significant (P<.001), with a clinically significant 1.5 metabolic equivalent of task increase in the intervention arm. There were trends for group effects for the psychosocial indicators, with paired t tests revealing significant increases in each at both assessment points in the intervention arm. At 4 months, there were 4 (10.3%) rehospitalizations in the control arm and none in intervention (P=.049). Intended theoretical mechanisms were also affected by the intervention. Extending CR in this accessible manner, rendering it more comprehensive, was effective in improving outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34175270
pii: S0003-9993(21)00454-8
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.04.026
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
IRCT
['IRCT20130211012439N3']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2091-2101.e3Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.