Diagnostic yield of small bowel capsule endoscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a real-world prospective study.

Bleeding Dedicated gastroenterologist Diagnostic yield Endoscopy Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy (SBCE)

Journal

Internal and emergency medicine
ISSN: 1970-9366
Titre abrégé: Intern Emerg Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101263418

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2022
Historique:
received: 18 02 2021
accepted: 05 06 2021
pubmed: 28 6 2021
medline: 12 4 2022
entrez: 27 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) visualizes the small bowel (SB) mucosa. Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding from SB accounts for the majority of SBCE indications. We aimed to assess, in a "real-world" prospective study, the diagnostic yield of SBCE in a cohort of consecutive patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Secondary end point was to assess the frequency of adverse events and the role of SBCE in determining the diagnostic work-up and clinical outcome. From 2016 to 2018, all patients referred for SBCE examination were enrolled. Indication for SBCE was re-assessed by 2 dedicated gastroenterologists. Inclusion criteria: (1) age ≥ 18 and ≤ 85 years; (2) diagnosis of OGIB; 3) non-diagnostic standard bidirectional endoscopy; (4) informed consent. Exclusion criteria: (1) deglutition impairment; (2) SBCE contraindications; (3) pregnancy. The cohort included 50 patients [males 18 (36%), age 68 (27-83)]. SBCE indication: patients with ongoing overt OGIB (Group A) (n = 11; 22%), previous overt OGIB (Group B) (n = 14; 28%), occult bleeding (with Iron Deficiency Anaemia) (Group C) (n = 25; 50%). SBCE detected clinically relevant lesions in 46 (92%) cases. Clinically relevant lesions were more frequent in Group C (24/25; 96%), followed by Group A (10/11; 91%) and Group B (12/14; 85.5%). After SBCE, treatment was medical (60%); endoscopic (14%), surgical (36%) or conservative (18%). Clinical follow-up showed complete resolution in 63.2%, partial/absent resolution in 18.4% of cases. In a prospective study, the high diagnostic yield of SBCE supports its role as first-line investigation in patients with OGIB. However, this achievement requires an accurate and timely assessment by dedicated gastroenterologists.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34176039
doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02791-z
pii: 10.1007/s11739-021-02791-z
pmc: PMC8964573
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

349-358

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0151332
pubmed: 26978517
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2015 Jun;107(6):334-9
pubmed: 26031860
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep 28;18(36):5051-7
pubmed: 23049213
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 May;26(5):796-801
pubmed: 21155884
Endoscopy. 2015 Apr;47(4):352-76
pubmed: 25826168
Endoscopy. 2018 Apr;50(4):423-446
pubmed: 29539652
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep;110(9):1265-87; quiz 1288
pubmed: 26303132
Endoscopy. 2005 Oct;37(10):951-9
pubmed: 16189767
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jun;85(6):1157-1168.e2
pubmed: 28069475
Gut. 2011 Oct;60(10):1309-16
pubmed: 21561874
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Feb;8(2):151-8
pubmed: 19879968
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov;52(11):1219-1223
pubmed: 28691597
Gastroenterology. 2004 Mar;126(3):643-53
pubmed: 14988816
Dig Liver Dis. 2010 Aug;42(8):560-6
pubmed: 20227929
Hepatogastroenterology. 2011 Mar-Apr;58(106):301-5
pubmed: 21661386
Intern Med. 2012;51(9):997-1001
pubmed: 22576376
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Nov;76(5):983-92
pubmed: 23078923
Gastroenterology. 2017 Feb;152(3):497-514
pubmed: 28063287
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Dec;10(12):1376-80
pubmed: 22677574

Auteurs

Samanta Romeo (S)

Department of Systems Medicine, University "Tor Vergata" of Rome, Vie Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
GI Unit, ASST, Hospital Maggiore of Crema, Crema, Italy.

Benedetto Neri (B)

Department of Systems Medicine, University "Tor Vergata" of Rome, Vie Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.

Michelangela Mossa (M)

Department of Systems Medicine, University "Tor Vergata" of Rome, Vie Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.

Maria Elena Riccioni (ME)

Department of Traslational Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Ludovica Scucchi (L)

Department of Systems Medicine, University "Tor Vergata" of Rome, Vie Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.

Giorgia Sena (G)

Department of Systems Medicine, University "Tor Vergata" of Rome, Vie Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.

Saverio Potenza (S)

Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University "Tor Vergata" of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Carmelina Petruzziello (C)

Department of Systems Medicine, University "Tor Vergata" of Rome, Vie Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.

Livia Biancone (L)

Department of Systems Medicine, University "Tor Vergata" of Rome, Vie Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy. biancone@med.uniroma2.it.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH