Influence of butt joint connections with long guiding areas on the stability of single crowns and 3-unit bridges - an in-vitro-study.

Cyclic loading Fatigue testing Implant Implantat-abutment interface Tube in tube connection

Journal

Journal of prosthodontic research
ISSN: 2212-4632
Titre abrégé: J Prosthodont Res
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101490359

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Oct 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 29 6 2021
medline: 21 10 2021
entrez: 28 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability of single crowns and 3-unit bridges in relation to the implant-abutment complex with and without tube in tube connection.Methods 60 specimens with a total of 90 implants (diameter 3.8 mm) were fabricated and distributed into 4 groups: CST (Crown with short tube), CLT (crown with long tube), BNT (Bridge without tube) and BLT (bridge with long tube). All superstructures consisted of one-piece hybrid abutment restorations out of monolithic zirconia, bonded on prefabricated titanium bases and were directly screwed into the implants. Specimen underwent artificial aging (2.000.000 cycles, 120 N, 30° off axis) and were subsequently loaded in an universal testing machine at an angle of 30° until failure. The specimens were examined for damage during and after artificial aging.Results During artificial aging, one test specimen of group CLT and two test specimens of group BNT failed. The average failure load was 498.8 (± 34.4) N for CLT, 418.8 (± 41.5) N for CST, 933.1 (± 26.2) N for BLT and 634.4 (± 29.0) N for BNT, with a statistical differences (p ˂ 0.001) between the crown and bridge groups. All tested samples exhibited macroscopic deformations at the implant shoulder, which were more pronounced in the specimens without a tube in tube connection.Conclusions Single crowns and 3-unit bridges with a long tube in tube connection showed significantly higher fatigue fracture strength compared to restorations with short or without tube in tube connection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34176848
doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00036
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

455-460

Auteurs

Tobias Graf (T)

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Jan-Frederik Güth (JF)

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Daniel Edelhoff (D)

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Gerald Krennmair (G)

Dental School, Siegmund Freud University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.

Michael Stimmelmayr (M)

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Private Practice for Oral Surgery, Cham, Germany.

Articles similaires

Hemiarthroplasty in young patients.

Hazimah Mahmud, Dong Wang, Andra Topan-Rat et al.
1.00
Humans Male Hemiarthroplasty Middle Aged Aged
Silicon Dioxide Water Hot Temperature Compressive Strength X-Ray Diffraction
Nitriles Tensile Strength Materials Testing Gloves, Protective Product Packaging
Calcium Carbonate Sand Powders Construction Materials Materials Testing

Classifications MeSH