Designing "Safer Water." A Virtual Reality Tool for the Safety and the Psychological Well-Being of Citizens Exposed to the Risk of Natural Disasters.
affinity diagram
brainstorming
co-design
emergency
river floods
safety
serious game
virtual reality
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
28
02
2021
accepted:
12
05
2021
entrez:
28
6
2021
pubmed:
29
6
2021
medline:
29
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Virtual Reality (VR) is a popular technology to recreate reality-like scenarios, including dangerous ones, in a realistic but safe way. Because of this potential, VR based research has been applied in psychology studies to provide training and education about how to behave in emergencies such as fires, earthquakes, floods, or typhoons. All these different virtual scenarios have been built to observe how people react to emergencies, what behaviors they adopted, what level of stress is generated, and finally, how to increase citizens' safety. However, there is still little research that shows how Virtual Environment (VE) should be designed to convey appropriate social and psychological "cues" to participants. In this work, we present the result of a series of co-design sessions aiming to bring experts to collaborate in setting up virtual scenarios to increase the quality of life, safety perception, and risk awareness in people living in the proximity of a river. Floods are one of the most threatening climate events, and because of climate change, they are expected to become even more frequent. These disasters have a devastating impact on communities, increasing anxiety and stress levels in citizens living close to rivers. We involved relevant stakeholders to design "Safer Water," an immersive, interactive, virtual experience to support citizens in psychologically and behaviorally managing pre and post riverbank breakdown situations. HCI experts, hydrogeological and hydraulic engineers, psychologists, and VEs designers took part in affinity diagram and brainstorming activities. Results show how the adopted method was able to generate suitable virtual scenarios, to highlight and classify relevant design requirements, and to find strategies that could improve the quality of life and psychological well-being in "risk-exposed citizens." The discussion includes a set of open-access guidelines derived from the co-design activities, to support the design of VE for the purposes discussed in the paper.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34177732
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.674171
pmc: PMC8222683
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
674171Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Gamberini, Bettelli, Benvegnù, Orso, Spagnolli and Ferri.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;81:495-501
pubmed: 11317797
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2015 Apr;21(4):529-38
pubmed: 26357103
Front Behav Neurosci. 2009 Dec 23;3:59
pubmed: 20076762
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2018 Feb;24(2):1063-1076
pubmed: 28092563
Ergonomics. 2003 Jun 20;46(8):842-58
pubmed: 12745982
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2020 May 21;7:2055668320913770
pubmed: 32499921
Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. 2017;22(2):307-324
pubmed: 30197567
Risk Anal. 2013 May;33(5):866-76
pubmed: 22817689
Psychol Health Med. 2010 Jan;15(1):61-73
pubmed: 20391225