Diaphragm dysfunction, lung aeration loss and weaning-induced pulmonary oedema in difficult-to-wean patients.
Diaphragm
Difficult weaning
Lung ultrasound
Pulmonary oedema
Journal
Annals of intensive care
ISSN: 2110-5820
Titre abrégé: Ann Intensive Care
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101562873
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jun 2021
28 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
06
03
2021
accepted:
09
06
2021
entrez:
28
6
2021
pubmed:
29
6
2021
medline:
29
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Diaphragm dysfunction and weaning-induced pulmonary oedema are commonly involved during weaning failure, but their physiological interactions have been poorly reported. Our hypothesis was that diaphragm dysfunction is not particularly associated with weaning-induced pulmonary oedema. It was a single-centre and physiological study conducted in patients who had failed a first spontaneous breathing trial and who underwent a second trial. The diaphragm function was evaluated by measuring the tracheal pressure generated in response to a bilateral magnetic phrenic nerves stimulations. Weaning-induced pulmonary oedema was diagnosed in case of failure of the spontaneous breathing trial if patients exhibited signs of plasma concentration or echocardiographic diagnosis of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure elevation. Fifty-three patients were included and 31/53 (58%) failed the spontaneous breathing trial, including 24/31 (77%) patients with weaning-induced pulmonary oedema. Diaphragm dysfunction was present in 33/53 (62%) patients. Diaphragm dysfunction or weaning-induced pulmonary oedema were present in 26/31 (84%) of the patients who failed the spontaneous breathing trial. Weaning-induced pulmonary oedema occurred in 20/33 (61%) patients with a diaphragm dysfunction and in 4/20 (20%) patients without (p = 0.005). Weaning-induced pulmonary oedema was three times more frequent in case of diaphragm dysfunction. Even in case of diaphragm dysfunction, physicians might be encouraged to investigate the presence of weaning-induced pulmonary oedema during weaning failure.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Diaphragm dysfunction and weaning-induced pulmonary oedema are commonly involved during weaning failure, but their physiological interactions have been poorly reported. Our hypothesis was that diaphragm dysfunction is not particularly associated with weaning-induced pulmonary oedema.
METHODS
METHODS
It was a single-centre and physiological study conducted in patients who had failed a first spontaneous breathing trial and who underwent a second trial. The diaphragm function was evaluated by measuring the tracheal pressure generated in response to a bilateral magnetic phrenic nerves stimulations. Weaning-induced pulmonary oedema was diagnosed in case of failure of the spontaneous breathing trial if patients exhibited signs of plasma concentration or echocardiographic diagnosis of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure elevation.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Fifty-three patients were included and 31/53 (58%) failed the spontaneous breathing trial, including 24/31 (77%) patients with weaning-induced pulmonary oedema. Diaphragm dysfunction was present in 33/53 (62%) patients. Diaphragm dysfunction or weaning-induced pulmonary oedema were present in 26/31 (84%) of the patients who failed the spontaneous breathing trial. Weaning-induced pulmonary oedema occurred in 20/33 (61%) patients with a diaphragm dysfunction and in 4/20 (20%) patients without (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Weaning-induced pulmonary oedema was three times more frequent in case of diaphragm dysfunction. Even in case of diaphragm dysfunction, physicians might be encouraged to investigate the presence of weaning-induced pulmonary oedema during weaning failure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34181105
doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00886-6
pii: 10.1186/s13613-021-00886-6
pmc: PMC8237539
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
99Références
Intensive Care Med. 2019 May;45(5):601-608
pubmed: 30863935
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Aug;40(8):1069-79
pubmed: 24861350
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Jan 3;10(1):1
pubmed: 31900667
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jul;40(7):2064-72
pubmed: 22584759
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Jan 9;9(1):6
pubmed: 30627804
Anesthesiology. 1988 Aug;69(2):171-9
pubmed: 3044189
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jul;10(7):4424-4432
pubmed: 30174891
Anaesthesia. 1998 Nov;53(11):1054-61
pubmed: 10023273
Anesthesiology. 2020 May;132(5):1114-1125
pubmed: 32084029
Chest. 2019 Jun;155(6):1131-1139
pubmed: 30910636
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jul;34(7):1231-8
pubmed: 18297263
Anesthesiology. 1974 Sep;41(3):242-55
pubmed: 4604401
N Engl J Med. 1979 Aug 30;301(9):453-9
pubmed: 460363
Crit Care Med. 2009 May;37(5):1696-701
pubmed: 19325473
Eur Respir J. 2007 May;29(5):1033-56
pubmed: 17470624
Crit Care. 2019 Sep 18;23(1):321
pubmed: 31533788
Intensive Care Med. 2016 May;42(5):853-861
pubmed: 26572511
Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Apr 23;8(1):53
pubmed: 29687276
Anesthesiology. 2017 Jun;126(6):1107-1115
pubmed: 28338483
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun 1;195(11):1477-1485
pubmed: 27768396
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Aug 13;9(1):88
pubmed: 31410738
Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1882-9
pubmed: 24717458
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb 1;183(3):364-71
pubmed: 20813887
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 May 1;165(9):1265-70
pubmed: 11991876
Anesthesiology. 1994 Apr;80(4):751-60
pubmed: 8024128
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Mar;46(3):475-484
pubmed: 31915837
Crit Care. 2016 Oct 27;20(1):346
pubmed: 27784322
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Nov;154(5):1310-7
pubmed: 8912741
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan 1;195(1):57-66
pubmed: 27310484
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Mar;155(3):916-21
pubmed: 9117026
Crit Care. 2016 Nov 12;20(1):369
pubmed: 27836002
PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5550
pubmed: 19440240
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Dec 13;9(1):137
pubmed: 31836913
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Nov;109(5):1432-40
pubmed: 20813981
Crit Care. 2019 Nov 21;23(1):370
pubmed: 31752937