A multicentre retrospective review of SABR reirradiation in rectal cancer recurrence.


Journal

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
ISSN: 1879-0887
Titre abrégé: Radiother Oncol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8407192

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2021
Historique:
received: 28 04 2021
revised: 17 06 2021
accepted: 21 06 2021
pubmed: 29 6 2021
medline: 3 11 2021
entrez: 28 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is associated with considerable morbidity, poor quality of life and an overall survival of 9 months. The non-operative treatment of LRRC is an understudied area, there is no consensus on management in this setting. We aim to perform a retrospective, multicentre analysis of patients treated with SABR reirradiation. All patients were identified who received SABR re-irradiation for LRRC, at 3 UK centres, between August 2015 and September 2020. Eligible patients had pelvic recurrence and were either not suitable/opted not for surgery, or margin positive after exenturative surgery. Patients were treated with 30 Gy in 5 fractions and followed up with clinical review and CT scan at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. 69 patients with 81 lesions were identified and median follow up was 28 months. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 12.1 months (10.4, 17.7) and 38.7 months (28.9,-) respectively. 2-year OS was 0.77 (0.66, 0.89). 58.3% of deaths were as a result of consequences of local relapse. 42.6% of patients had local relapse at death or last follow up. Our outcomes are encouraging for a population who had R1 resections, refused or were refused surgery; as they are similar to those in surgical series. Prospective data including details of survival, local relapse and QOL; with an optimised SABR technique, is required to establish SABR as an alternative to surgery.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is associated with considerable morbidity, poor quality of life and an overall survival of 9 months. The non-operative treatment of LRRC is an understudied area, there is no consensus on management in this setting. We aim to perform a retrospective, multicentre analysis of patients treated with SABR reirradiation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All patients were identified who received SABR re-irradiation for LRRC, at 3 UK centres, between August 2015 and September 2020. Eligible patients had pelvic recurrence and were either not suitable/opted not for surgery, or margin positive after exenturative surgery. Patients were treated with 30 Gy in 5 fractions and followed up with clinical review and CT scan at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
RESULTS
69 patients with 81 lesions were identified and median follow up was 28 months. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 12.1 months (10.4, 17.7) and 38.7 months (28.9,-) respectively. 2-year OS was 0.77 (0.66, 0.89). 58.3% of deaths were as a result of consequences of local relapse. 42.6% of patients had local relapse at death or last follow up.
CONCLUSION
Our outcomes are encouraging for a population who had R1 resections, refused or were refused surgery; as they are similar to those in surgical series. Prospective data including details of survival, local relapse and QOL; with an optimised SABR technique, is required to establish SABR as an alternative to surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34182013
pii: S0167-8140(21)06615-9
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.030
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-6

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Philippa Johnstone (P)

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Leroy Okonta (L)

The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.

Katharine Aitken (K)

The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.

Jane Holmes (J)

Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, UK.

Mark Harrison (M)

Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK.

Deena Harji (D)

University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Sean M O'Cathail (SM)

Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK.

Claire Taylor (C)

St Mark's Hospital, London UK.

Yat Tsang (Y)

Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK.

Mark Wing (M)

Patient representative, London, UK.

Rebecca Muirhead (R)

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: rebecca.muirhead@oncology.ox.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH