Accessing and utilising gender-affirming healthcare in England and Wales: trans and non-binary people's accounts of navigating gender identity clinics.
Mental health
Qualitative research
Trans
healthcare experiences
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jun 2021
28 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
01
04
2021
accepted:
18
06
2021
entrez:
29
6
2021
pubmed:
30
6
2021
medline:
1
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Transgender, or trans, people experience a number of barriers to accessing gender-affirming healthcare and have a range of barriers and facilitators to primary care and specialist services, commonly citing discrimination and cisgenderism playing a central role in shaping accessibility. The pathway through primary care to specialist services is a particularly precarious time for trans people, and misinformation and poorly applied protocols can have a detrimental impact on wellbeing. We recruited trans participants from an HIV Self-Testing Public Health Intervention (SELPHI) trial to interviews which explored contemporary gender-affirming service experiences, with an aim to examine the path from primary care services through to specialist gender services, in the UK. A narrative synthesis of vignettes and thematic analysis of in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with twenty trans individuals. We summarise positive and negative accounts of care under three broad categories: Experiences with primary care physicians, referrals to gender identity clinics (GICs), and experiences at GICs. We discuss implications of this research in terms of how to improve best practice for trans people attempting to access gender-affirming healthcare in the UK. Here we highlight the importance of GP's access to knowledge around pathways and protocols and clinical practice which treats trans patients holistically.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Transgender, or trans, people experience a number of barriers to accessing gender-affirming healthcare and have a range of barriers and facilitators to primary care and specialist services, commonly citing discrimination and cisgenderism playing a central role in shaping accessibility. The pathway through primary care to specialist services is a particularly precarious time for trans people, and misinformation and poorly applied protocols can have a detrimental impact on wellbeing.
METHOD
METHODS
We recruited trans participants from an HIV Self-Testing Public Health Intervention (SELPHI) trial to interviews which explored contemporary gender-affirming service experiences, with an aim to examine the path from primary care services through to specialist gender services, in the UK.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A narrative synthesis of vignettes and thematic analysis of in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with twenty trans individuals. We summarise positive and negative accounts of care under three broad categories: Experiences with primary care physicians, referrals to gender identity clinics (GICs), and experiences at GICs.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We discuss implications of this research in terms of how to improve best practice for trans people attempting to access gender-affirming healthcare in the UK. Here we highlight the importance of GP's access to knowledge around pathways and protocols and clinical practice which treats trans patients holistically.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34182985
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06661-4
pii: 10.1186/s12913-021-06661-4
pmc: PMC8240290
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
609Subventions
Organisme : National Institute for Social Care and Health Research
ID : RP-PG-1212-20006
Organisme : National Institute for Social Care and Health Research
ID : RP-PG-1212-20006
Organisme : National Institute for Social Care and Health Research
ID : RP-PG-1212-20006
Organisme : National Institute for Social Care and Health Research
ID : RP-PG-1212-20006
Organisme : National Institute for Social Care and Health Research
ID : RP-PG-1212-20006
Organisme : National Institute for Social Care and Health Research
ID : RP-PG-1212-20006
Organisme : National Institute for Social Care and Health Research
ID : RP-PG-1212-20006
Organisme : National Institute for Social Care and Health Research
ID : RP-PG-1212-20006
Références
Arch Sex Behav. 2018 Jul;47(5):1301-1304
pubmed: 29696550
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 May 04;12:110
pubmed: 22559234
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 06;10(2):e0117686
pubmed: 25659122
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2009 Sep-Oct;20(5):348-61
pubmed: 19732694
J Sex Med. 2016 Mar;13(3):402-12
pubmed: 26944465
Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):1231-1240
pubmed: 32677100
Aust J Gen Pract. 2020 Jul;49(7):401-405
pubmed: 32599995
Fam Pract. 2018 May 23;35(3):302-306
pubmed: 29177485
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;55(4):391-399
pubmed: 33198483
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2011 Apr;23(4):175-82
pubmed: 21489011
Transgend Health. 2020 Dec 11;5(4):267-271
pubmed: 33644316
Int J Transgend. 2018 Apr 25;20(2-3):195-204
pubmed: 32999606
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Oct 23;18(1):531
pubmed: 30352556
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Feb 11;32:100700
pubmed: 33681732
BMJ. 2017 Jun 30;357:j2866
pubmed: 28667001
J Immigr Minor Health. 2018 Feb;20(1):115-123
pubmed: 27804013
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e022425
pubmed: 30580262
Transgend Health. 2017 Jul 01;2(1):107-118
pubmed: 29082331
Transgend Health. 2018 Dec 28;3(1):251-256
pubmed: 30623023
AIDS Care. 2018 Jul;30(7):836-843
pubmed: 29409344
Lancet. 2016 Jul 23;388(10042):390-400
pubmed: 27323925
Health Sociol Rev. 2021 Mar;30(1):58-71
pubmed: 33622200