Outcomes of eyes with retinal vein occlusion that are lost to follow-up after antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy.
Humans
Retinal Vein Occlusion
/ complications
Endothelial Growth Factors
Ranibizumab
/ therapeutic use
Bevacizumab
/ therapeutic use
Retrospective Studies
Lost to Follow-Up
Intravitreal Injections
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
macula
retina
Journal
The British journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1468-2079
Titre abrégé: Br J Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0421041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2022
12 2022
Historique:
received:
01
03
2021
accepted:
15
06
2021
pubmed:
30
6
2021
medline:
25
11
2022
entrez:
29
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the outcomes of eyes with macular oedema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) that are lost to follow-up (LTFU) after antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. A retrospective, single-centre, consecutive case series of RVO patients receiving injections who were LTFU >6 months was conducted. Data were collected from the visit before LTFU; return visit; 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after return; and the final visit. Ninety eyes of 83 patients were included. Fifty (55.5%) eyes had branch RVO and 40 (44.5%) had central RVO. Mean LTFU duration was 277.8 days with additional mean follow-up for 748.1 days after return. Mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity (VA) (Snellen) at the visit before LTFU was 0.72 (20/105) which worsened on return [1.04 (20/219), p<0.001) and remained worse at all timepoints after return: 0.92 (20/166) at 3 months (p<0.001), 0.97 (20/187) at 6 months (p<0.001), 0.94 (20/174) at 12 months (p<0.001) and 1.01 (20/205) at final visit (p<0.001). Mean central foveal thickness (CFT) increased from 252 µm at the visit before LTFU to 396 µm at the return visit (p<0.001). No difference in CFT was noted by 3 months (258 µm, p=0.71), 6 months (241 µm, p=0.54) or 12 months after return (250 µm, p=0.95). CFT was thinner at the final visit (215 µm, p=0.018). RVO patients receiving anti-VEGF injections who were LTFU experienced a decline in VA that did not return to the levels seen before LTFU despite improvement in CFT after restarting therapy, underscoring the importance of ongoing treatment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/AIMS
To evaluate the outcomes of eyes with macular oedema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) that are lost to follow-up (LTFU) after antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections.
METHOD
A retrospective, single-centre, consecutive case series of RVO patients receiving injections who were LTFU >6 months was conducted. Data were collected from the visit before LTFU; return visit; 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after return; and the final visit.
RESULTS
Ninety eyes of 83 patients were included. Fifty (55.5%) eyes had branch RVO and 40 (44.5%) had central RVO. Mean LTFU duration was 277.8 days with additional mean follow-up for 748.1 days after return. Mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity (VA) (Snellen) at the visit before LTFU was 0.72 (20/105) which worsened on return [1.04 (20/219), p<0.001) and remained worse at all timepoints after return: 0.92 (20/166) at 3 months (p<0.001), 0.97 (20/187) at 6 months (p<0.001), 0.94 (20/174) at 12 months (p<0.001) and 1.01 (20/205) at final visit (p<0.001). Mean central foveal thickness (CFT) increased from 252 µm at the visit before LTFU to 396 µm at the return visit (p<0.001). No difference in CFT was noted by 3 months (258 µm, p=0.71), 6 months (241 µm, p=0.54) or 12 months after return (250 µm, p=0.95). CFT was thinner at the final visit (215 µm, p=0.018).
CONCLUSION
RVO patients receiving anti-VEGF injections who were LTFU experienced a decline in VA that did not return to the levels seen before LTFU despite improvement in CFT after restarting therapy, underscoring the importance of ongoing treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34183325
pii: bjophthalmol-2021-319180
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319180
doi:
Substances chimiques
Endothelial Growth Factors
0
Ranibizumab
ZL1R02VT79
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1742-1747Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: MS, RM, J-CW, DP, SNP, AO, JV and AS: no financial disclosures. JH is a consultant for Gyroscope Therapeutics (London, UK), IVERICbio (New York, New York, USA) and OccuRx (Melbourne, Australia). He has received grants from Roche/Genentech (San Francisco, California, USA), Aldeyra Therapeutics (Lexington, Massachusetts, USA) and IVERICbio (New York, New York, USA). ACH is a consultant for Allergan (Dublin, Ireland), Roche/Genentech (San Francisco, California, USA) and Regeneron (Tarrytown, New York, USA). He has also received grants from Allergan (Dublin, Ireland), Genentech (San Francisco, California, USA), and Regeneron (Tarrytown, New York, USA). CR has received grants from Roche/Genentech (San Francisco, California, USA), Regeneron (Tarrytown, New York, USA), Allergan (Dublin, Ireland), Novartis (Basel, Switzerland) and Iconic (San Francisco, Iconic). He is a consultant for Roche/Genentech (San Francisco, California, USA), Alcon (Fort Worth, Texas, USA), Allergan (Dublin Ireland), Iconic (San Francisco, Iconic), Notal Vision (Prince William County, Virginia, USA), Kodiak (Palo Alto, California, USA), Santen (Osaka, Japan), Shire (Lexington, Massachusetts, USA) and Novartis (Basel, Switzerland). SG has received personal fees from Bausch and Lomb (Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA), Johnson and Johnson (New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA), Merck Manuals (Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA), Genentech (San Francisco, California, USA), Santen Pharmaceutical (Osaka, Japan) and Deciphera (Waltham, Massachusetts, USA).