Deep neural network-based classification of cardiotocograms outperformed conventional algorithms.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 06 2021
28 06 2021
Historique:
received:
13
03
2021
accepted:
16
06
2021
entrez:
29
6
2021
pubmed:
30
6
2021
medline:
3
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cardiotocography records fetal heart rates and their temporal relationship to uterine contractions. To identify high risk fetuses, obstetricians inspect cardiotocograms (CTGs) by eye. Therefore, CTG traces are often interpreted differently among obstetricians, resulting in inappropriate interventions. However, few studies have focused on quantitative and nonbiased algorithms for CTG evaluation. In this study, we propose a newly constructed deep neural network model (CTG-net) to detect compromised fetal status. CTG-net consists of three convolutional layers that extract temporal patterns and interrelationships between fetal heart rate and uterine contraction signals. We aimed to classify the abnormal group (umbilical artery pH < 7.20 or Apgar score at 1 min < 7) and the normal group from CTG data. We evaluated the performance of the CTG-net with the F1 score and compared it with conventional algorithms, namely, support vector machine and k-means clustering, and another deep neural network model, long short-term memory. CTG-net showed the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.73 ± 0.04, which was significantly higher than that of long short-term memory. CTG-net, a quantitative and automated diagnostic aid system, enables early intervention for putatively abnormal fetuses, resulting in a reduction in the number of cases of hypoxic injury.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34183748
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92805-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-92805-9
pmc: PMC8238938
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13367Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 10;111(23):8619-24
pubmed: 24812127
Nature. 2017 Feb 2;542(7639):115-118
pubmed: 28117445
Acta Paediatr. 2007 May;96(5):644-7
pubmed: 17376185
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;22:101684
pubmed: 30711680
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;131(1):13-24
pubmed: 26433401
J Perinat Med. 2006;34(4):298-302
pubmed: 16856819
J Neural Eng. 2018 Oct;15(5):056013
pubmed: 29932424
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997 Apr;57(1):33-7
pubmed: 9175667
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;218(5):523.e1-523.e12
pubmed: 29408586
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 13;14:16
pubmed: 24418387
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:5866-5869
pubmed: 30441670
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;116(5):1232-40
pubmed: 20966730
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;72(3):169-73
pubmed: 21921568
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;190(1):118-23
pubmed: 14749646
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 03;2:CD006066
pubmed: 28157275
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 9;14(1):e0210103
pubmed: 30625197
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Nov;30(21):2578-2584
pubmed: 27819172
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):286
pubmed: 31888592
Nat Med. 2018 Sep;24(9):1342-1350
pubmed: 30104768