Sheep scab spatial distribution: the roles of transmission pathways.
Disease
Epidemiology
Infection
Mange
Model
Movement
Network
Parasites
Psoroptes
Journal
Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
Titre abrégé: Parasit Vectors
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Jun 2021
29 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
09
04
2021
accepted:
12
06
2021
entrez:
30
6
2021
pubmed:
1
7
2021
medline:
6
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ovine psoroptic mange (sheep scab) is a highly pathogenic contagious infection caused by the mite Psoroptes ovis. Following 21 years in which scab was eradicated in the UK, it was inadvertently reintroduced in 1972 and, despite the implementation of a range of control methods, its prevalence increased steadily thereafter. Recent reports of resistance to macrocyclic lactone treatments may further exacerbate control problems. A better understanding of the factors that facilitate its transmission are required to allow improved management of this disease. Transmission of infection occurs within and between contiguous sheep farms via infected sheep-to-sheep or sheep-environment contact and through long-distance movements of infected sheep, such as through markets. A stochastic metapopulation model was used to investigate the impact of different transmission routes on the spatial pattern of outbreaks. A range of model scenarios were considered following the initial infection of a cluster of highly connected contiguous farms. Scab spreads between clusters of neighbouring contiguous farms after introduction but when long-distance movements are excluded, infection then self-limits spatially at boundaries where farm connectivity is low. Inclusion of long-distance movements is required to generate the national patterns of disease spread observed. Preventing the movement of scab infested sheep through sales and markets is essential for any national management programme. If effective movement control can be implemented, regional control in geographic areas where farm densities are high would allow more focussed cost-effective scab management.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Ovine psoroptic mange (sheep scab) is a highly pathogenic contagious infection caused by the mite Psoroptes ovis. Following 21 years in which scab was eradicated in the UK, it was inadvertently reintroduced in 1972 and, despite the implementation of a range of control methods, its prevalence increased steadily thereafter. Recent reports of resistance to macrocyclic lactone treatments may further exacerbate control problems. A better understanding of the factors that facilitate its transmission are required to allow improved management of this disease. Transmission of infection occurs within and between contiguous sheep farms via infected sheep-to-sheep or sheep-environment contact and through long-distance movements of infected sheep, such as through markets.
METHODS
METHODS
A stochastic metapopulation model was used to investigate the impact of different transmission routes on the spatial pattern of outbreaks. A range of model scenarios were considered following the initial infection of a cluster of highly connected contiguous farms.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Scab spreads between clusters of neighbouring contiguous farms after introduction but when long-distance movements are excluded, infection then self-limits spatially at boundaries where farm connectivity is low. Inclusion of long-distance movements is required to generate the national patterns of disease spread observed.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Preventing the movement of scab infested sheep through sales and markets is essential for any national management programme. If effective movement control can be implemented, regional control in geographic areas where farm densities are high would allow more focussed cost-effective scab management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34187531
doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04850-y
pii: 10.1186/s13071-021-04850-y
pmc: PMC8243883
doi:
Substances chimiques
Lactones
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
344Subventions
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/M009122/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC/PC/19067
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/V038613/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Feb 1;137(Pt A):43-51
pubmed: 28107880
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 11;107(19):8866-70
pubmed: 20421468
Vet Rec. 2006 Jun 3;158(22):749-52
pubmed: 16751308
Parasit Vectors. 2012 Feb 08;5:30
pubmed: 22316180
Mol Cell Probes. 2011 Oct-Dec;25(5-6):212-8
pubmed: 21963943
Br Med J. 1915 Mar 27;1(2830):546-7
pubmed: 20767555
Vet Parasitol. 1999 Jun 30;83(3-4):187-200
pubmed: 10423002
PLoS Med. 2006 Jun;3(6):e212
pubmed: 16640458
Exp Appl Acarol. 2006;39(2):159-62
pubmed: 16733788
Vet Rec. 2020 Oct 17;187(8):325
pubmed: 33060237
Parasitol Today. 1986 Nov;2(11):302-7
pubmed: 15462743
Vet Parasitol. 1985 Oct;18(3):269-79
pubmed: 4082452
J R Soc Interface. 2010 Jan 6;7(42):67-79
pubmed: 19364721
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2021 Mar 10;14:273-279
pubmed: 33898228
Vet Parasitol. 2009 Oct 28;165(1-2):112-8
pubmed: 19713045
Med Vet Entomol. 2018 Jun;32(2):244-250
pubmed: 29345314
Prev Vet Med. 2012 Apr 1;104(1-2):101-6
pubmed: 22079030
Vet Rec. 1995 Mar 25;136(12):287-9
pubmed: 7793034
Vet Parasitol. 2012 Sep 30;189(1):39-43
pubmed: 22525584
Vet Rec. 2018 Jan 27;182(4):106
pubmed: 29317477
Vet Res. 2021 Apr 12;52(1):54
pubmed: 33845898
Vet Rec. 2019 Jul 27;185(4):105-106
pubmed: 31346112
Vet Rec. 1980 Nov 15;107(20):469-70
pubmed: 7445347
Vet Parasitol. 2019 Aug;272:79-82
pubmed: 31395209