Etiological factors commonly related to the need of endodontic treatment in individuals with orofacial clefts.


Journal

Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry
ISSN: 1989-5488
Titre abrégé: J Clin Exp Dent
Pays: Spain
ID NLM: 101603132

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 24 10 2020
accepted: 20 12 2020
entrez: 30 6 2021
pubmed: 1 7 2021
medline: 1 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Dental treatment is fundamental in the rehabilitation of individuals with orofacial clefts, due to their oral condition; when indicated, endodontic therapy allows elimination of infection of the root canal system. Aim: To analyze, by a retrospective study, the most prevalent type of orofacial cleft, the etiological factors most commonly related to the endodontic treatment need, as well as their success and failure rates. This study analyzed data from 136 records (76 females and 60 males) with mean age of 19 years and 7 months, who met the inclusion criteria. Data were collected including the type of cleft, etiological factors that led to the need of endodontic treatment, as well as their success and failure rates. The statistical analysis was performed by the chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher's Exact and Batista Pike tests. Among the etiological factors, were pulp involvement due to caries, endodontic treatment for prosthetic rehabilitation, tooth resorptions, for orthodontic movement, dental trauma and indication of internal tooth bleaching; the most prevalent factor was pulp involvement due to caries. Among all data analyzed, cleft lip and palate presented the highest percentage, and there was predominance of treatment success compared to failure. The well-conducted root canal treatment is necessary for dental rehabilitation, maintaining the masticatory function and esthetic harmony of these individuals.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Dental treatment is fundamental in the rehabilitation of individuals with orofacial clefts, due to their oral condition; when indicated, endodontic therapy allows elimination of infection of the root canal system. Aim: To analyze, by a retrospective study, the most prevalent type of orofacial cleft, the etiological factors most commonly related to the endodontic treatment need, as well as their success and failure rates.
MATERIAL AND METHODS METHODS
This study analyzed data from 136 records (76 females and 60 males) with mean age of 19 years and 7 months, who met the inclusion criteria. Data were collected including the type of cleft, etiological factors that led to the need of endodontic treatment, as well as their success and failure rates. The statistical analysis was performed by the chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher's Exact and Batista Pike tests.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among the etiological factors, were pulp involvement due to caries, endodontic treatment for prosthetic rehabilitation, tooth resorptions, for orthodontic movement, dental trauma and indication of internal tooth bleaching; the most prevalent factor was pulp involvement due to caries. Among all data analyzed, cleft lip and palate presented the highest percentage, and there was predominance of treatment success compared to failure.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The well-conducted root canal treatment is necessary for dental rehabilitation, maintaining the masticatory function and esthetic harmony of these individuals.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34188764
doi: 10.4317/jced.57980
pii: 57980
pmc: PMC8223154
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e580-e585

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2021 Medicina Oral S.L.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Références

J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Feb;20(1):9-15
pubmed: 22437671
Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Aug;57(2):227-32
pubmed: 7668246
Int J Dent. 2020 Feb 26;2020:3190938
pubmed: 32184827
Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Jul-Aug;18(4):2-7
pubmed: 24262413
J Endod. 2016 Aug;42(8):1186-90
pubmed: 27372162
J Oral Rehabil. 2016 Oct;43(10):753-8
pubmed: 27519460
J Int Oral Health. 2014 Nov-Dec;6(6):99-104
pubmed: 25628496
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Feb 18;20(1):57
pubmed: 32070302
J Dent Res. 2008 Feb;87(2):119-25
pubmed: 18218836
J Conserv Dent. 2019 Mar-Apr;22(2):129-132
pubmed: 31142980
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 13;10(3):e0118961
pubmed: 25768737
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2010 Oct;14(4):236-40
pubmed: 21731249
Br Dent J. 2020 Apr;228(7):521-526
pubmed: 32277210
Dent Traumatol. 2019 Dec;35(6):324-332
pubmed: 31125490
Int Endod J. 1999 Sep;32(5):343-60
pubmed: 10551108
Iran Endod J. 2016 Spring;11(2):142-5
pubmed: 27141225
F1000Res. 2019 Dec 2;8:2039
pubmed: 31885864
Fogorv Sz. 2014 Mar;107(1):29-33
pubmed: 24812750

Auteurs

Viviane-da Silva Siqueira (VS)

Endodontics Sector, Dentistry Department, Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo (HRAC/ USP), Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.

José-Francisco Mateo-Castillo (JF)

Endodontics Sector, Dentistry Department, Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo (HRAC/ USP), Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.

Lidiane-de Castro Pinto (LC)

Endodontics Sector, Dentistry Department, Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo (HRAC/ USP), Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.

Daniela Garib (D)

Orthodontics Sector, Dentistry Department, Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo (HRAC/ USP), Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.

Claudia-Ramos Pinheiro (CR)

Endodontics Sector, Dentistry Department, Specialization in Endodontics, Postgraduate Center for Dentistry - CPO Uningá, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.

Classifications MeSH