Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter-rows in different floral kingdoms.
Apiformes
country comparison
floral traits
functional traits
management intensities
viticultural landscapes
Journal
Ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2045-7758
Titre abrégé: Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566408
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
06
11
2020
revised:
24
03
2021
accepted:
13
04
2021
entrez:
30
6
2021
pubmed:
1
7
2021
medline:
1
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Wild bees are threatened by multiple interacting stressors, such as habitat loss, land use change, parasites, and pathogens. However, vineyards with vegetated inter-rows can offer high floral resources within viticultural landscapes and provide foraging and nesting habitats for wild bees. Here, we assess how vineyard management regimes (organic vs. conventional; inter-row vegetation management) and landscape composition determine the inter-row plant and wild bee assemblages, as well as how these variables relate to functional traits in 24 Austrian and 10 South African vineyards. Vineyards had either permanent vegetation cover in untilled inter-rows or temporary vegetation cover in infrequently tilled inter-rows. Proportion of seminatural habitats (e.g., fallows, grassland, field margins) and woody structures (e.g., woodlots, single trees, tree rows) were used as proxies for landscape composition and mapped within 500-m radius around the study vineyards. Organic vineyard management increased functional richness (FRic) of wild bees and flowering plants, with woody structures marginally increasing species richness and FRic of wild bees. Wild bee and floral traits were differently associated across the countries. In Austria, several bee traits (e.g., lecty, pollen collection type, proboscis length) were associated with flower color and symmetry, while in South African vineyards, only bees' proboscis length was positively correlated with floral traits characteristic of Asteraceae flowers (e.g., ray-disk morphology, yellow colors). Solitary bee species in Austria benefitted from infrequent tillage, while ground nesting species preferred inter-rows with undisturbed soils. Higher proportions of woody structures in surrounding landscapes resulted in less solitary and corbiculate bees in Austria, but more aboveground nesting species in South Africa. In both countries, associations between FRic of wild bees and flowering plants were positive both in organic and in conventional vineyards. We recommend the use of diverse cover crop seed mixtures to enhance plant flowering diversity in inter-rows, to increase wild bee richness in viticultural landscapes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34188862
doi: 10.1002/ece3.7623
pii: ECE37623
pmc: PMC8216979
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
7927-7945Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Références
J Econ Entomol. 2005 Jun;98(3):790-5
pubmed: 16022307
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 7;14(6):e0217839
pubmed: 31173614
Ecol Lett. 2021 Jan;24(1):73-83
pubmed: 33051978
Ecology. 2008 Aug;89(8):2290-301
pubmed: 18724739
J Insect Conserv. 2020;24(1):175-185
pubmed: 32089639
PeerJ. 2018 Sep 27;6:e5654
pubmed: 30280031
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 7;274(1608):303-13
pubmed: 17164193
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Jan;26(1):119-188
pubmed: 31891233
Environ Manage. 2012 May;49(5):1054-60
pubmed: 22411057
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 07;6(1):e14508
pubmed: 21249126
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 12;7(1):17445
pubmed: 29234045
Ecol Evol. 2019 Mar 12;9(7):4103-4115
pubmed: 31015991
Sci Adv. 2019 Oct 16;5(10):eaax0121
pubmed: 31663019
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0151482
pubmed: 26986000
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 8;12(12):e0189268
pubmed: 29220412
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Jun;25(6):1941-1956
pubmed: 30964578
Zootaxa. 2013 Jan 11;3601:1-134
pubmed: 24614086
Oecologia. 2007 Sep;153(3):589-96
pubmed: 17483965
J Environ Manage. 2013 Aug 15;125:12-8
pubmed: 23629013
Environ Entomol. 2010 Jun;39(3):970-8
pubmed: 20550812
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jun;25(6):345-53
pubmed: 20188434
Science. 1978 Mar 24;199(4335):1302-10
pubmed: 17840770
Insects. 2019 Sep 26;10(10):
pubmed: 31561623
PeerJ. 2016 Jun 22;4:e2042
pubmed: 27366636
Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):853-8
pubmed: 10706275
Ecology. 2014 Feb;95(2):466-74
pubmed: 24669739
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Aug;25(23):23215-23226
pubmed: 29862481
Science. 2006 Jul 21;313(5785):351-4
pubmed: 16857940
J Appl Ecol. 2018 Sep;55(5):2484-2495
pubmed: 30147143