Extended rotation flap for reconstruction of partial thickness defects of the tip and nasal ala region: in search of better aesthetic results.

Aesthetic reconstruction Basal cell carcinoma Nose flap Nose reconstruction

Journal

JPRAS open
ISSN: 2352-5878
Titre abrégé: JPRAS Open
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101680420

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Historique:
received: 15 01 2021
accepted: 07 05 2021
entrez: 30 6 2021
pubmed: 1 7 2021
medline: 1 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Basal cell carcinoma is the most common non-melanoma skin cancer of the nose. Defects of the nasal ala and tip region are among the most difficult to repair due to their intrinsic characteristics. To present our experience with the extended rotation flap for reconstruction of nasal ala defects and evaluate the outcome using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Twenty-two patients with partial thickness nasal ala defects reconstructed using the extended rotation flap were assessed. Final cosmetic and functional outcomes were evaluated using the POSAS. Flaps survived in all the reported cases and no major complication was recorded. Histology showed complete excision of the tumour in all cases. Using the POSAS, the mean overall evaluation for patients was 1.8/10, while the mean overall evaluation for the evaluation panel was 2.2/ 10. Although similar flaps have been previously described, the extended rotation flap for nasal ala and tip reconstruction represents a functionally and cosmetically appealing wound closure option, respecting and avoiding any distortion of the alar crease.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Basal cell carcinoma is the most common non-melanoma skin cancer of the nose. Defects of the nasal ala and tip region are among the most difficult to repair due to their intrinsic characteristics.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To present our experience with the extended rotation flap for reconstruction of nasal ala defects and evaluate the outcome using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).
METHODS AND MATERIALS METHODS
Twenty-two patients with partial thickness nasal ala defects reconstructed using the extended rotation flap were assessed. Final cosmetic and functional outcomes were evaluated using the POSAS.
RESULTS RESULTS
Flaps survived in all the reported cases and no major complication was recorded. Histology showed complete excision of the tumour in all cases. Using the POSAS, the mean overall evaluation for patients was 1.8/10, while the mean overall evaluation for the evaluation panel was 2.2/ 10.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Although similar flaps have been previously described, the extended rotation flap for nasal ala and tip reconstruction represents a functionally and cosmetically appealing wound closure option, respecting and avoiding any distortion of the alar crease.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34189233
doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2021.05.004
pii: S2352-5878(21)00046-2
pmc: PMC8220098
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

82-88

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest..

Références

J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1986 Feb;12(2):154-8
pubmed: 3944332
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985 Aug;76(2):239-47
pubmed: 4023097
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Oct;126(4):1222-1231
pubmed: 20885244
Dermatol Surg. 2001 Apr;27(4):409-10
pubmed: 11298717
Dermatol Surg. 2000 Jun;26(6):543-6
pubmed: 10848934
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Mar;45(3):432-435
pubmed: 28108241
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Sep;118:10-34
pubmed: 31288208
Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1262-1268
pubmed: 28782201
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Aug;116(2):514-22
pubmed: 16079683
Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(1):23-30
pubmed: 19889165
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2011 Feb;19(1):63-83
pubmed: 21112511
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001 Apr-Jun;3(2):91-9
pubmed: 11368658
Dermatol Surg. 2012 Dec;38(12):1968-74
pubmed: 23190386

Auteurs

Annachiara Cavaliere (A)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, Napoli, Italy.

Barbara Maisto (B)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, Napoli, Italy.

Tatiana Zaporojan (T)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, Napoli, Italy.

Ludovica Giordano (L)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, Napoli, Italy.

Luigi Sorbino (L)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, Napoli, Italy.

Antonio Zaffiro (A)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, Napoli, Italy.

Amalia Vozza (A)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, Napoli, Italy.

Simone La Padula (S)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, Napoli, Italy.

Francesco D'Andrea (F)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, Napoli, Italy.

Fabrizio Schonauer (F)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, Napoli, Italy.

Classifications MeSH