Characterization of response to atezolizumab + bevacizumab versus sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma: Results from the IMbrave150 trial.


Journal

Cancer medicine
ISSN: 2045-7634
Titre abrégé: Cancer Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101595310

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2021
Historique:
received: 12 02 2021
accepted: 19 03 2021
pubmed: 1 7 2021
medline: 19 2 2022
entrez: 30 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

IMbrave150 is a phase III trial that assessed atezolizumab + bevacizumab (ATEZO/BEV) versus sorafenib (SOR) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and demonstrated a significant improvement in clinical outcomes. Exploratory analyses characterized objective response rate (ORR), depth (DpR), and duration of response (DoR), and patients with a complete response (CR). Patients were randomized 2:1 to intravenous ATEZO (1200 mg) + BEV (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks or oral SOR (400 mg) twice daily. Tumors were evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) and HCC-modified RECIST (mRECIST). ORR by prior treatment and largest baseline liver lesion size, DoR, time to response (TTR), and complete response (TTCR) were analyzed. For both criteria, responses favored ATEZO/BEV versus SOR regardless of prior treatment and in patients with lesions ≥3 cm. Median TTR was 2.8 months per RECIST 1.1 (range: 1.2-12.3 months) and 2.8 months per mRECIST (range: 1.1-12.3 months) with ATEZO/BEV. Patients receiving ATEZO/BEV had a greater DpR, per both criteria, across baseline liver lesion sizes. Characteristics of complete responders were similar to those of the intent-to-treat population. In complete responders receiving ATEZO/BEV per mRECIST versus RECIST 1.1, respectively, median TTCR was shorter (5.5 vs. 7.0 months), mean baseline sum of lesion diameter was longer (5.0 [SD, 5.1] vs. 2.6 [SD, 1.4] cm), and mean largest liver lesion size was larger (4.8 [SD, 4.2] vs. 2.3 [SD, 1.0] cm). These data highlight the improved ORR, DpR, and CR rates with ATEZO/BEV in unresectable HCC.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
IMbrave150 is a phase III trial that assessed atezolizumab + bevacizumab (ATEZO/BEV) versus sorafenib (SOR) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and demonstrated a significant improvement in clinical outcomes. Exploratory analyses characterized objective response rate (ORR), depth (DpR), and duration of response (DoR), and patients with a complete response (CR).
METHODS
Patients were randomized 2:1 to intravenous ATEZO (1200 mg) + BEV (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks or oral SOR (400 mg) twice daily. Tumors were evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) and HCC-modified RECIST (mRECIST). ORR by prior treatment and largest baseline liver lesion size, DoR, time to response (TTR), and complete response (TTCR) were analyzed.
RESULTS
For both criteria, responses favored ATEZO/BEV versus SOR regardless of prior treatment and in patients with lesions ≥3 cm. Median TTR was 2.8 months per RECIST 1.1 (range: 1.2-12.3 months) and 2.8 months per mRECIST (range: 1.1-12.3 months) with ATEZO/BEV. Patients receiving ATEZO/BEV had a greater DpR, per both criteria, across baseline liver lesion sizes. Characteristics of complete responders were similar to those of the intent-to-treat population. In complete responders receiving ATEZO/BEV per mRECIST versus RECIST 1.1, respectively, median TTCR was shorter (5.5 vs. 7.0 months), mean baseline sum of lesion diameter was longer (5.0 [SD, 5.1] vs. 2.6 [SD, 1.4] cm), and mean largest liver lesion size was larger (4.8 [SD, 4.2] vs. 2.3 [SD, 1.0] cm).
CONCLUSIONS
These data highlight the improved ORR, DpR, and CR rates with ATEZO/BEV in unresectable HCC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34189869
doi: 10.1002/cam4.4090
pmc: PMC8366100
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
Bevacizumab 2S9ZZM9Q9V
atezolizumab 52CMI0WC3Y
Sorafenib 9ZOQ3TZI87

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03434379']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Comparative Study Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

5437-5447

Subventions

Organisme : This manuscript was sponsored by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. and Genentech, Inc. Support for third-party writing assistance was provided by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Lancet. 2017 Jun 24;389(10088):2492-2502
pubmed: 28434648
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jul;19(7):940-952
pubmed: 29875066
Hepatology. 2021 Jan;73 Suppl 1:158-191
pubmed: 32430997
J Nucl Med. 2018 Jul;59(7):1042-1048
pubmed: 29217739
Lancet. 2018 Mar 24;391(10126):1163-1173
pubmed: 29433850
Oncotarget. 2015 Oct 6;6(30):28716-30
pubmed: 26308250
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92(3):205-16
pubmed: 10655437
Hepatology. 2018 Oct;68(4):1429-1440
pubmed: 29194711
Ann Surg. 2008 Oct;248(4):617-25
pubmed: 18936575
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 Mar;22(3):265-78
pubmed: 21353979
Liver Cancer. 2018 Mar;7(1):104-119
pubmed: 29662837
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Cancer Med. 2021 Aug;10(16):5437-5447
pubmed: 34189869
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(14):1927-36
pubmed: 26188850
Semin Liver Dis. 2010 Feb;30(1):52-60
pubmed: 20175033
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 20;31(30):3764-75
pubmed: 24043732
J Hepatol. 2020 Feb;72(2):288-306
pubmed: 31954493
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):1894-1905
pubmed: 32402160
Am J Transplant. 2009 Aug;9(8):1920-8
pubmed: 19552767
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Sep;150:26-29
pubmed: 32447035
Eur J Cancer. 2006 Jul;42(10):1322-30
pubmed: 16737813
Hepatology. 2021 Mar;73(3):998-1010
pubmed: 32416631
Eur J Cancer. 2015 May;51(7):800-7
pubmed: 25794604
JAMA. 2010 Mar 17;303(11):1062-9
pubmed: 20233824
J Hepatol. 2017 Jun;66(6):1166-1172
pubmed: 28131794

Auteurs

Riad Salem (R)

Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.

Daneng Li (D)

Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, USA.

Nicolas Sommer (N)

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.

Sairy Hernandez (S)

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.

Wendy Verret (W)

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.

Beiying Ding (B)

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.

Riccardo Lencioni (R)

Department of Radiology, University of Pisa School of Medicine, Pisa, Italy.
Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH