Sunitinib and Evofosfamide (TH-302) in Systemic Treatment-Naïve Patients with Grade 1/2 Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: The GETNE-1408 Trial.
Biomarkers
Evofosfamide
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor
Safety
Sunitinib
Journal
The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
11
01
2021
accepted:
23
06
2021
pubmed:
1
7
2021
medline:
22
12
2021
entrez:
30
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Sunitinib (SUN)-induced hypoxia within the tumor could promote the activation of the prodrug evofosfamide (EVO), locally releasing the cytotoxic DNA alkylator bromo-isophosphoramide mustard. SUNEVO, a phase II, open-label, single-arm trial, investigated the potential synergy of SUN plus EVO in advanced progressive pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs). Systemic treatment-naïve patients with advanced or metastatic, unresectable, grade 1/2 panNETs with a Ki67 ≤20%, received EVO 340 mg/m From 2015 to 2018, 17 patients were enrolled. The median age was 62.4 years, 47% had a Ki67 >10%, and 70.6% had liver metastasis. Patients received a median of five and four cycles of SUN and EVO, respectively. After a median follow-up of 15.7 months, 17.6% of patients achieved a complete (n = 1) or partial response (n = 2), and 11 patients had stable disease (64.7%). The median progression-free survival was 10.4 months (95% confidence interval, 2.6-18.0). Treatment-related adverse events (grade ≥3) were observed in 64.7% of the patients, the most frequent being neutropenia (35.3%), fatigue (17.6%), and thrombopenia (11.8%). Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity was reported in 88.2% of the patients. No correlation was found between treatment response and DAXX, ATRX, MEN1, SETD2, and PTEN gene mutations. SUN plus EVO had a negative toxicity profile that should be taken into account for further clinical research in advanced panNETs. The combination showed moderate activity in terms of treatment response that did not correlate with somatic mutations. (Clinical trial identification number: NCT02402062) IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Addition of hypoxia-activated prodrugs has been proposed as a potential mechanism to overcome tumor resistance to antiangiogenic agents. Sunitinib and evofosfamide, which were widely proposed as a potential synergistic option, showed modest efficacy in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs), reaching a median objective response rate of 17.6% and median progression-free survival of 10.4 months. Treatment response does not correlate with the biomarkers analyzed. The high systemic toxicity, with 88.2% of patients discontinuing the treatment, makes this therapeutic approach unfeasible and encourages future research to overcome panNETs' resistance to antiangiogenic agents with other therapies with a safer profile.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Sunitinib (SUN)-induced hypoxia within the tumor could promote the activation of the prodrug evofosfamide (EVO), locally releasing the cytotoxic DNA alkylator bromo-isophosphoramide mustard. SUNEVO, a phase II, open-label, single-arm trial, investigated the potential synergy of SUN plus EVO in advanced progressive pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs).
METHODS
Systemic treatment-naïve patients with advanced or metastatic, unresectable, grade 1/2 panNETs with a Ki67 ≤20%, received EVO 340 mg/m
RESULTS
From 2015 to 2018, 17 patients were enrolled. The median age was 62.4 years, 47% had a Ki67 >10%, and 70.6% had liver metastasis. Patients received a median of five and four cycles of SUN and EVO, respectively. After a median follow-up of 15.7 months, 17.6% of patients achieved a complete (n = 1) or partial response (n = 2), and 11 patients had stable disease (64.7%). The median progression-free survival was 10.4 months (95% confidence interval, 2.6-18.0). Treatment-related adverse events (grade ≥3) were observed in 64.7% of the patients, the most frequent being neutropenia (35.3%), fatigue (17.6%), and thrombopenia (11.8%). Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity was reported in 88.2% of the patients. No correlation was found between treatment response and DAXX, ATRX, MEN1, SETD2, and PTEN gene mutations.
CONCLUSION
SUN plus EVO had a negative toxicity profile that should be taken into account for further clinical research in advanced panNETs. The combination showed moderate activity in terms of treatment response that did not correlate with somatic mutations. (Clinical trial identification number: NCT02402062) IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Addition of hypoxia-activated prodrugs has been proposed as a potential mechanism to overcome tumor resistance to antiangiogenic agents. Sunitinib and evofosfamide, which were widely proposed as a potential synergistic option, showed modest efficacy in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs), reaching a median objective response rate of 17.6% and median progression-free survival of 10.4 months. Treatment response does not correlate with the biomarkers analyzed. The high systemic toxicity, with 88.2% of patients discontinuing the treatment, makes this therapeutic approach unfeasible and encourages future research to overcome panNETs' resistance to antiangiogenic agents with other therapies with a safer profile.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34190375
doi: 10.1002/onco.13885
pmc: PMC8571752
doi:
Substances chimiques
Nitroimidazoles
0
Phosphoramide Mustards
0
TH 302
0
Sunitinib
V99T50803M
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02402062']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
941-949Informations de copyright
© 2021 AlphaMed Press.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 10;364(6):501-13
pubmed: 21306237
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1872-3; author reply 1873-4
pubmed: 21561356
Science. 2011 Mar 4;331(6021):1199-203
pubmed: 21252315
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019 Apr 1;49(4):354-360
pubmed: 30834940
Target Oncol. 2021 Jan;16(1):27-35
pubmed: 33411058
Curr Opin Oncol. 2012 Jul;24(4):433-40
pubmed: 22510940
Neuroendocrinology. 2016;103(2):119-24
pubmed: 26784901
EMBO Mol Med. 2015 Feb 19;7(4):368-79
pubmed: 25700172
Nature. 2017 Mar 2;543(7643):65-71
pubmed: 28199314
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jan 15;23(2):600-609
pubmed: 27407094
Ann Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;28(2):339-343
pubmed: 27836885
Target Oncol. 2016 Dec;11(6):815-824
pubmed: 27924459
Antioxid Redox Signal. 2021 Oct 10;35(11):904-915
pubmed: 32787454
Transl Oncol. 2017 Oct;10(5):760-765
pubmed: 28778024
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Aug 2;20(9):1231-1239
pubmed: 29415215
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016 Mar;77(3):441-57
pubmed: 26811177
Med Oncol. 2014 Dec;31(12):251
pubmed: 25395378
Cancer Biol Ther. 2015;16(3):438-49
pubmed: 25679067
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 12;376(2):125-135
pubmed: 28076709
Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 Jun;11(6):393-410
pubmed: 21606941
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 17;371(3):224-33
pubmed: 25014687
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017 Mar;79(3):611-619
pubmed: 28238078
Rare Cancers Ther. 2015;3:13-33
pubmed: 27182476