Early social distancing policies in Europe, changes in mobility & COVID-19 case trajectories: Insights from Spring 2020.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
27
01
2021
accepted:
28
05
2021
entrez:
30
6
2021
pubmed:
1
7
2021
medline:
9
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Social distancing have been widely used to mitigate community spread of SARS-CoV-2. We sought to quantify the impact of COVID-19 social distancing policies across 27 European counties in spring 2020 on population mobility and the subsequent trajectory of disease. We obtained data on national social distancing policies from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker and aggregated and anonymized mobility data from Google. We used a pre-post comparison and two linear mixed-effects models to first assess the relationship between implementation of national policies and observed changes in mobility, and then to assess the relationship between changes in mobility and rates of COVID-19 infections in subsequent weeks. Compared to a pre-COVID baseline, Spain saw the largest decrease in aggregate population mobility (~70%), as measured by the time spent away from residence, while Sweden saw the smallest decrease (~20%). The largest declines in mobility were associated with mandatory stay-at-home orders, followed by mandatory workplace closures, school closures, and non-mandatory workplace closures. While mandatory shelter-in-place orders were associated with 16.7% less mobility (95% CI: -23.7% to -9.7%), non-mandatory orders were only associated with an 8.4% decrease (95% CI: -14.9% to -1.8%). Large-gathering bans were associated with the smallest change in mobility compared with other policy types. Changes in mobility were in turn associated with changes in COVID-19 case growth. For example, a 10% decrease in time spent away from places of residence was associated with 11.8% (95% CI: 3.8%, 19.1%) fewer new COVID-19 cases. This comprehensive evaluation across Europe suggests that mandatory stay-at-home orders and workplace closures had the largest impacts on population mobility and subsequent COVID-19 cases at the onset of the pandemic. With a better understanding of policies' relative performance, countries can more effectively invest in, and target, early nonpharmacological interventions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Social distancing have been widely used to mitigate community spread of SARS-CoV-2. We sought to quantify the impact of COVID-19 social distancing policies across 27 European counties in spring 2020 on population mobility and the subsequent trajectory of disease.
METHODS
We obtained data on national social distancing policies from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker and aggregated and anonymized mobility data from Google. We used a pre-post comparison and two linear mixed-effects models to first assess the relationship between implementation of national policies and observed changes in mobility, and then to assess the relationship between changes in mobility and rates of COVID-19 infections in subsequent weeks.
RESULTS
Compared to a pre-COVID baseline, Spain saw the largest decrease in aggregate population mobility (~70%), as measured by the time spent away from residence, while Sweden saw the smallest decrease (~20%). The largest declines in mobility were associated with mandatory stay-at-home orders, followed by mandatory workplace closures, school closures, and non-mandatory workplace closures. While mandatory shelter-in-place orders were associated with 16.7% less mobility (95% CI: -23.7% to -9.7%), non-mandatory orders were only associated with an 8.4% decrease (95% CI: -14.9% to -1.8%). Large-gathering bans were associated with the smallest change in mobility compared with other policy types. Changes in mobility were in turn associated with changes in COVID-19 case growth. For example, a 10% decrease in time spent away from places of residence was associated with 11.8% (95% CI: 3.8%, 19.1%) fewer new COVID-19 cases.
DISCUSSION
This comprehensive evaluation across Europe suggests that mandatory stay-at-home orders and workplace closures had the largest impacts on population mobility and subsequent COVID-19 cases at the onset of the pandemic. With a better understanding of policies' relative performance, countries can more effectively invest in, and target, early nonpharmacological interventions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34191818
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253071
pii: PONE-D-21-02922
pmc: PMC8244916
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0253071Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The above stated commercial affiliations did not alter adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Sci Data. 2020 Jul 8;7(1):230
pubmed: 32641758
JAMA. 2020 Sep 1;324(9):859-870
pubmed: 32745200
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Apr;8(4):e480
pubmed: 32109372
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;20(11):1247-1254
pubmed: 32621869
JAMA. 2020 Aug 18;324(7):635-637
pubmed: 32663243
Econ Disaster Clim Chang. 2020 Jun 19;:1-21
pubmed: 32838118
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):193-202
pubmed: 33729915
Science. 2020 Sep 18;369(6510):1465-1470
pubmed: 32680881
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jul;39(7):1237-1246
pubmed: 32407171
Lancet. 2020 Aug 22;396(10250):535-544
pubmed: 32645347
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7820):257-261
pubmed: 32512579
J Public Econ. 2020 Dec;192:104316
pubmed: 33162621
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240644
pubmed: 33057450
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0245008
pubmed: 33382849