Characteristics of persons accused of intimate partner homicide amongst forensic psychiatric observations.

IPH IPH characteristics IPH perpetrator characteristics IPH perpetrators IPH risk factors IPV forensic psychiatric observation

Journal

The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa
ISSN: 1608-9685
Titre abrégé: S Afr J Psychiatr
Pays: South Africa
ID NLM: 100958626

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 06 01 2021
accepted: 06 04 2021
entrez: 30 6 2021
pubmed: 1 7 2021
medline: 1 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Intimate partner homicide (IPH) is a global public health problem. One study conducted over 66 countries found that 13.5% of all homicides and 38.6% of female homicides were committed by an intimate partner. In South Africa, there were no published studies that examine alleged perpetrators of IPH that were referred for forensic psychiatric observation. To describe the profile of accused persons referred for forensic psychiatric observation for a charge of murder or attempted murder of their intimate partners. Certain characteristics were further examined according to the psychiatric observation outcomes. The study was conducted at Sterkfontein Hospital, a forensic psychiatric hospital in Gauteng, South Africa. A retrospective record review of accused persons referred for forensic psychiatric observation for a charge of murder or attempted murder of their intimate partners was conducted. The period of the review was 19 years. The definition of intimate partners included current or former spouses and partners, same-sex partners and rejected suitors. One hundred and sixty-three files, which included forensic psychiatric reports, were reviewed. The findings related to the profile of accused persons and offence characteristics indicated that: (1) history of violent behaviour is prevalent; (2) homicides mostly occur in private homes; (3) knives and firearms are most often used; (4) infidelity, separation and jealousy are common motives; (5) psychotic disorders, personality disorders and substance use disorders feature prominently. A total of 88% of the sample were found fit to stand trial and 82% were found criminally responsible. Factors significantly associated with being found fit to stand trial and criminally responsible following the forensic psychiatric observation were: male gender, having received a tertiary education, employment prior to the offence, earning a salary of more than R10 000, having no previous psychiatric or medical illness, a positive forensic history, previous intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration, indicating a motive for the homicide, having no psychiatric illness at the time of the offence which would impact fitness to stand trial and criminal responsibility.Factors significantly associated with being found not fit to stand trial and not criminally responsible following the forensic psychiatric observation were: female gender, having received a primary education, unemployment prior to the offence, having a previous psychiatric or medical illness, no forensic history, no previous IPV perpetration, not indicating a motive for the homicide, having a psychiatric illness at the time of the offence which would impact fitness to stand trial and criminal responsibility. The characteristics highlighted in this study can contribute to the development of risk assessment tools which can be used to identify likely perpetrators of IPH. Other interventions, for example controlling access to knives and firearms, reducing substance abuse and improving mental health services, are also important in the prevention of IPH.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Intimate partner homicide (IPH) is a global public health problem. One study conducted over 66 countries found that 13.5% of all homicides and 38.6% of female homicides were committed by an intimate partner. In South Africa, there were no published studies that examine alleged perpetrators of IPH that were referred for forensic psychiatric observation.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To describe the profile of accused persons referred for forensic psychiatric observation for a charge of murder or attempted murder of their intimate partners. Certain characteristics were further examined according to the psychiatric observation outcomes.
SETTING METHODS
The study was conducted at Sterkfontein Hospital, a forensic psychiatric hospital in Gauteng, South Africa.
METHODS METHODS
A retrospective record review of accused persons referred for forensic psychiatric observation for a charge of murder or attempted murder of their intimate partners was conducted. The period of the review was 19 years. The definition of intimate partners included current or former spouses and partners, same-sex partners and rejected suitors.
RESULTS RESULTS
One hundred and sixty-three files, which included forensic psychiatric reports, were reviewed. The findings related to the profile of accused persons and offence characteristics indicated that: (1) history of violent behaviour is prevalent; (2) homicides mostly occur in private homes; (3) knives and firearms are most often used; (4) infidelity, separation and jealousy are common motives; (5) psychotic disorders, personality disorders and substance use disorders feature prominently. A total of 88% of the sample were found fit to stand trial and 82% were found criminally responsible. Factors significantly associated with being found fit to stand trial and criminally responsible following the forensic psychiatric observation were: male gender, having received a tertiary education, employment prior to the offence, earning a salary of more than R10 000, having no previous psychiatric or medical illness, a positive forensic history, previous intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration, indicating a motive for the homicide, having no psychiatric illness at the time of the offence which would impact fitness to stand trial and criminal responsibility.Factors significantly associated with being found not fit to stand trial and not criminally responsible following the forensic psychiatric observation were: female gender, having received a primary education, unemployment prior to the offence, having a previous psychiatric or medical illness, no forensic history, no previous IPV perpetration, not indicating a motive for the homicide, having a psychiatric illness at the time of the offence which would impact fitness to stand trial and criminal responsibility.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The characteristics highlighted in this study can contribute to the development of risk assessment tools which can be used to identify likely perpetrators of IPH. Other interventions, for example controlling access to knives and firearms, reducing substance abuse and improving mental health services, are also important in the prevention of IPH.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34192084
doi: 10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v27i0.1675
pii: SAJPsy-27-1675
pmc: PMC8182458
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1675

Subventions

Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : D43 TW007278
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Références

Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Jul;86(7):552-58
pubmed: 18670666
Violence Vict. 2009;24(4):546-56
pubmed: 19694357
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2015 Sep;43(3):300-12
pubmed: 26438808
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2010 Aug;54(4):494-516
pubmed: 19531601
Violence Against Women. 2016 Mar;22(4):432-53
pubmed: 26391620
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2011 Feb;21(1):51-62
pubmed: 20603817
J Forensic Leg Med. 2015 Nov;36:25-31
pubmed: 26355562
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Aug;87(2):331-336
pubmed: 31348402
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2003 Jul;4(3):265-76
pubmed: 14697126
J Forensic Sci. 2016 Jan;61 Suppl 1:S163-70
pubmed: 26292990
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Nov 13;:886260519888195
pubmed: 31718399
J Forensic Leg Med. 2013 Nov;20(8):1099-107
pubmed: 24237830
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2009;5(3):199-203
pubmed: 19598012
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2008;18(5):306-18
pubmed: 19072934
Behav Sci Law. 2012 Sep-Oct;30(5):598-614
pubmed: 23015414
Am J Addict. 2001 Spring;10(2):122-35
pubmed: 11444155
J Forensic Sci. 2014 Mar;59(2):533-9
pubmed: 24745084
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Oct;64(10):1006-11
pubmed: 23820784
Lancet. 2013 Sep 7;382(9895):859-65
pubmed: 23791474
S Afr J Psychiatr. 2018 Mar 20;24:1142
pubmed: 30263219
PLoS Med. 2013;10(4):e1001412
pubmed: 23565064

Auteurs

Sonali N Valabdass (SN)

Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Ugasvaree Subramaney (U)

Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Amanda Edge (A)

Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Classifications MeSH