Closing schools for SARS-CoV-2: a pragmatic rapid recommendation.
COVID-19
adolescent health
epidemiology
Journal
BMJ paediatrics open
ISSN: 2399-9772
Titre abrégé: BMJ Paediatr Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101715309
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
30
11
2020
revised:
13
01
2021
accepted:
13
01
2021
entrez:
30
6
2021
pubmed:
1
7
2021
medline:
1
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In Belgium, schools closed during the first lockdown in March 2020, with a partial reopening in May. They fully reopened in September. During the summer, infections started to increase in the general population, speeding up in September. Some measures were taken to limit social contacts but those were insufficient to mitigate the exponential rise of infections in October. Children were still receiving all lessons at school at that time and it was questioned whether this position was tenable. We systematically compared the benefits and harms of closing primary and secondary schools and developed a recommendation. A multidisciplinary panel, including school pupils and teachers, educational experts, clinicians and researchers, produced this recommendation in compliance with the standards for trustworthy rapid guidelines. The recommendation is based on data collected through national surveillance or studies from Belgium, and supported by a rapid literature review. Closing schools during the first lockdown probably resulted in a large learning delay and possibly led to more cases of child abuse. We are uncertain about the effect on the infection rate, hospitalisations, transmission rates, mental health of children, teachers and parents. The panel concluded that the balance of benefits and harms of closing schools clearly shifts against closing schools. Detrimental effects are even worse for vulnerable children. This recommendation is affected by the local virus circulation. The guideline panel issues a strong recommendation against closing schools when the virus circulation is low to moderate, and a weak recommendation against closing schools when the virus circulation is high. It does not apply when the school system cannot function due to lack of teachers, too many children who are at home or a shortage of support services. As the results of international studies are consistent with Belgian study results, this recommendation may also be relevant internationally.
Sections du résumé
Background
In Belgium, schools closed during the first lockdown in March 2020, with a partial reopening in May. They fully reopened in September. During the summer, infections started to increase in the general population, speeding up in September. Some measures were taken to limit social contacts but those were insufficient to mitigate the exponential rise of infections in October. Children were still receiving all lessons at school at that time and it was questioned whether this position was tenable. We systematically compared the benefits and harms of closing primary and secondary schools and developed a recommendation.
Methods
A multidisciplinary panel, including school pupils and teachers, educational experts, clinicians and researchers, produced this recommendation in compliance with the standards for trustworthy rapid guidelines. The recommendation is based on data collected through national surveillance or studies from Belgium, and supported by a rapid literature review.
Results
Closing schools during the first lockdown probably resulted in a large learning delay and possibly led to more cases of child abuse. We are uncertain about the effect on the infection rate, hospitalisations, transmission rates, mental health of children, teachers and parents. The panel concluded that the balance of benefits and harms of closing schools clearly shifts against closing schools. Detrimental effects are even worse for vulnerable children. This recommendation is affected by the local virus circulation.
Conclusion
The guideline panel issues a strong recommendation against closing schools when the virus circulation is low to moderate, and a weak recommendation against closing schools when the virus circulation is high. It does not apply when the school system cannot function due to lack of teachers, too many children who are at home or a shortage of support services. As the results of international studies are consistent with Belgian study results, this recommendation may also be relevant internationally.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34192193
doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000971
pii: bmjpo-2020-000971
pmc: PMC7868123
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e000971Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Euro Surveill. 2020 Sep;25(38):
pubmed: 32975186
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 18;384(7):669-671
pubmed: 33406327
JAMA. 2020 Sep 1;324(9):859-870
pubmed: 32745200
Intern Med J. 2020 Jan;50(1):30-37
pubmed: 31943616
Public Health Res Pract. 2020 Jun 30;30(2):
pubmed: 32601650
Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Jun;116(Pt 2):104757
pubmed: 33593632
J Public Health (Oxf). 2020 Nov 23;42(4):698-703
pubmed: 32776102
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Jun;4(6):421
pubmed: 32302537
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Nov;4(11):807-816
pubmed: 32758454
Cad Saude Publica. 2020 Apr 30;36(4):e00074420
pubmed: 32374808
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Aug 07;69(31):1023-1025
pubmed: 32759921
J Travel Med. 2020 Nov 9;27(7):
pubmed: 32761125
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2003 Jun;37(3):374-81
pubmed: 12780478
BMJ. 2008 May 10;336(7652):1049-51
pubmed: 18467413
BMJ. 2016 Sep 28;354:i5191
pubmed: 27680768
BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6
pubmed: 18436948
Arch Pediatr. 2020 Oct;27(7):388-392
pubmed: 32921531
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Sep 04;69(35):1216-1220
pubmed: 32881850