Systematic Review of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Oncology: From Personalized Medicine to Public Health.


Journal

The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2021
Historique:
received: 07 11 2019
accepted: 25 05 2021
pubmed: 2 7 2021
medline: 26 10 2021
entrez: 1 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To review and summarize all U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of programmed death (PD)-1 and PD-ligand 1 blocking antibodies (collectively referred to as PD-[L]1 inhibitors) over a 6-year period and corresponding companion/complementary diagnostic assays. To determine the indications and pivotal trials eligible for inclusion, approval letters and package inserts available on Drugs@FDA were evaluated for approved PD-[L]1 inhibitors to identify all new indications granted from the first approval of a PD-[L]1 inhibitor on September 4, 2014, through September 3, 2020. The corresponding FDA drug and device reviews from the marketing applications for the approved indications were identified through FDA internal records. Two reviewers independently extracted information for the endpoints, efficacy data, basis for approval, type of regulatory approval, and corresponding in vitro diagnostic device test. The results were organized by organ system and tumor type. Of 70 Biologic Licensing Application or supplement approvals that resulted in new indications, 32 (46%) were granted based on response rate (ORR) and durability of response, 26 (37%) on overall survival, 9 (13%) on progression-free survival, 2 (3%) on recurrence-free survival, and 1 (1%) on complete response rate. Most ORR-based approvals were granted under the accelerated approval provisions and were supported with prolonged duration of response. Overall, 21% of approvals were granted with a companion diagnostic. Efficacy results according to tumor type are discussed. PD-[L]1 inhibitors are an effective anticancer therapy in a subset of patients. This class of drugs has provided new treatment options for patients with unmet need across a wide variety of cancer types. Yet, the modest response rates in several tumor types signal a lack of understanding of the biology of these diseases. Further preclinical and clinical investigation may be required to identify a more appropriate patient population, particularly as drug development continues and additional treatment alternatives become available. The number of PD-[L]1 inhibitors in drug development and the associated companion and complementary diagnostics have led to regulatory challenges and questions regarding generalizability of trial results. The interchangeability of PD-L1 immunohistochemical assays between PD-1/PD-L1 drugs is unclear. Furthermore, robust responses in some patients with low levels of PD-L1 expression have limited the use of PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker across all cancers, particularly in the setting of diseases with few alternative treatment options. This review summarizes the biomarker thresholds and assays approved as complementary and companion diagnostics and provides regulatory perspective on the role of biomarkers in oncology drug development.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
To review and summarize all U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of programmed death (PD)-1 and PD-ligand 1 blocking antibodies (collectively referred to as PD-[L]1 inhibitors) over a 6-year period and corresponding companion/complementary diagnostic assays.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
To determine the indications and pivotal trials eligible for inclusion, approval letters and package inserts available on Drugs@FDA were evaluated for approved PD-[L]1 inhibitors to identify all new indications granted from the first approval of a PD-[L]1 inhibitor on September 4, 2014, through September 3, 2020. The corresponding FDA drug and device reviews from the marketing applications for the approved indications were identified through FDA internal records. Two reviewers independently extracted information for the endpoints, efficacy data, basis for approval, type of regulatory approval, and corresponding in vitro diagnostic device test. The results were organized by organ system and tumor type.
RESULTS
Of 70 Biologic Licensing Application or supplement approvals that resulted in new indications, 32 (46%) were granted based on response rate (ORR) and durability of response, 26 (37%) on overall survival, 9 (13%) on progression-free survival, 2 (3%) on recurrence-free survival, and 1 (1%) on complete response rate. Most ORR-based approvals were granted under the accelerated approval provisions and were supported with prolonged duration of response. Overall, 21% of approvals were granted with a companion diagnostic. Efficacy results according to tumor type are discussed.
CONCLUSION
PD-[L]1 inhibitors are an effective anticancer therapy in a subset of patients. This class of drugs has provided new treatment options for patients with unmet need across a wide variety of cancer types. Yet, the modest response rates in several tumor types signal a lack of understanding of the biology of these diseases. Further preclinical and clinical investigation may be required to identify a more appropriate patient population, particularly as drug development continues and additional treatment alternatives become available.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
The number of PD-[L]1 inhibitors in drug development and the associated companion and complementary diagnostics have led to regulatory challenges and questions regarding generalizability of trial results. The interchangeability of PD-L1 immunohistochemical assays between PD-1/PD-L1 drugs is unclear. Furthermore, robust responses in some patients with low levels of PD-L1 expression have limited the use of PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker across all cancers, particularly in the setting of diseases with few alternative treatment options. This review summarizes the biomarker thresholds and assays approved as complementary and companion diagnostics and provides regulatory perspective on the role of biomarkers in oncology drug development.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34196068
doi: 10.1002/onco.13887
pmc: PMC8488782
doi:

Substances chimiques

B7-H1 Antigen 0
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors 0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1786-e1799

Informations de copyright

Published 2021. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AlphaMed Press.

Références

N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 14;378(24):2288-2301
pubmed: 29863955
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 05;378(14):1277-1290
pubmed: 29562145
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jul 1;25(13):3753-3758
pubmed: 30787022
BMJ. 2018 Sep 10;362:k3529
pubmed: 30201790
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 22;376(25):2415-2426
pubmed: 28636851
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 14;372(20):1909-19
pubmed: 25970050
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 16;377(20):1919-1929
pubmed: 28885881
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1856-1867
pubmed: 27718784
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Dec;21(12):1574-1588
pubmed: 32971005
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):883-895
pubmed: 27269741
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 29;379(22):2108-2121
pubmed: 30345906
Science. 2018 Feb 16;359(6377):801-806
pubmed: 29301960
Lancet Oncol. 2022 May;23(5):659-670
pubmed: 35427471
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Apr 01;5(4):546-550
pubmed: 30570649
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Dec;17(12):e542-e551
pubmed: 27924752
Lancet. 2020 Jun 13;395(10240):1835-1844
pubmed: 32534646
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Feb;12(2):208-222
pubmed: 27913228
Lancet. 2018 Feb 24;391(10122):748-757
pubmed: 29268948
Lancet. 2017 Jun 24;389(10088):2492-2502
pubmed: 28434648
Am J Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec;39(6):545-548
pubmed: 24879468
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jul;19(7):940-952
pubmed: 29875066
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Apr;16(4):375-84
pubmed: 25795410
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Mar;18(3):312-322
pubmed: 28131785
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):2040-2051
pubmed: 30280635
Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):1853-1862
pubmed: 28822576
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Oct 1;5(10):1504-1506
pubmed: 31415061
BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;350:g7647
pubmed: 25555855
Oncologist. 2017 May;22(5):585-591
pubmed: 28438889
J Pathol. 2013 Jun;230(2):148-53
pubmed: 23447401
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 15;23(14):3484-3488
pubmed: 28087644
Lancet. 2014 Sep 20;384(9948):1109-17
pubmed: 25034862
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):51-64
pubmed: 29217288
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 8;366(10):883-892
pubmed: 22397650
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 28;366(26):2443-54
pubmed: 22658127
Lancet. 2013 Jan 26;381(9863):303-12
pubmed: 23177514
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320-30
pubmed: 25399552
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 21;380(12):1116-1127
pubmed: 30779529
Cancer Med. 2018 Mar;7(3):746-756
pubmed: 29436178
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1824-1835
pubmed: 28891423
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1823-1833
pubmed: 27718847
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov;18(11):1483-1492
pubmed: 28967485
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 8;379(19):1791-1795
pubmed: 30403935
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Jan 19;6(1):7
pubmed: 29347993
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Dec;1(9):1319-23
pubmed: 26181000
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 10;36(8):773-779
pubmed: 29355075
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1789-1801
pubmed: 29658430
J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 1;34(13):1510-7
pubmed: 26951310
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):563-569
pubmed: 30541754
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 24;383(13):1218-1230
pubmed: 32945632
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2093-2104
pubmed: 29658845
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):1894-1905
pubmed: 32402160
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 29;:JCO2018792259
pubmed: 30372384
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Jan 15;13(2 Pt 2):709s-715s
pubmed: 17255298
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul 20;38(21):2369-2379
pubmed: 32468956
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;35(19):2125-2132
pubmed: 28441111
Cancer Immunol Res. 2015 Oct;3(10):1158-64
pubmed: 26014095
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 30;374(26):2542-52
pubmed: 27093365
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun 10;37(17):1470-1478
pubmed: 30943124
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 21;380(12):1103-1115
pubmed: 30779531
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 21;377(25):2500-2501
pubmed: 29262275
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):956-965
pubmed: 27247226
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Mar;18(3):e143-e152
pubmed: 28271869
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1345-1356
pubmed: 28889792
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2078-2092
pubmed: 29658856
Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):67-76
pubmed: 27939400
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Sep 14;3(9):e172411
pubmed: 28817753
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009 Dec;65(1):27-32
pubmed: 19381630
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 16;376(11):1015-1026
pubmed: 28212060
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):1182-1191
pubmed: 28734759
Lancet. 2019 Jan 12;393(10167):156-167
pubmed: 30509740
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 12;377(15):1409-1412
pubmed: 29020592
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 6;379(23):2220-2229
pubmed: 30280641
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 10;29(17):2432-8
pubmed: 21555688
Ann Oncol. 2017 Dec 01;28(12):3044-3050
pubmed: 28950298
Nat Med. 2018 Jun;24(6):749-757
pubmed: 29867230
JAMA Oncol. 2018 May 10;4(5):e180013
pubmed: 29543932
Mol Cancer Ther. 2017 Nov;16(11):2598-2608
pubmed: 28835386
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 26;379(4):341-351
pubmed: 29863979
Nat Rev Cancer. 2019 Mar;19(3):133-150
pubmed: 30755690
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Feb;19(2):229-239
pubmed: 29361469
Oncologist. 2019 Jan;24(1):103-109
pubmed: 30120163
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Jun;16(6):742-774
pubmed: 29891526
Nat Med. 2016 Nov;22(11):1342-1350
pubmed: 27694933

Auteurs

Elaine Chang (E)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Lorraine Pelosof (L)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Steven Lemery (S)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Yutao Gong (Y)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Kirsten B Goldberg (KB)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Ann T Farrell (AT)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Patricia Keegan (P)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Janaki Veeraraghavan (J)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Guo Wei (G)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Gideon M Blumenthal (GM)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Laleh Amiri-Kordestani (L)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Harpreet Singh (H)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Lola Fashoyin-Aje (L)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Nicole Gormley (N)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Paul G Kluetz (PG)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Richard Pazdur (R)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Julia A Beaver (JA)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Marc R Theoret (MR)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH