Is SARS-CoV-2 Neutralized More Effectively by IgM and IgA than IgG Having the Same Fab Region?

COVID-19 IgA IgG IgM SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody

Journal

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2076-0817
Titre abrégé: Pathogens
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101596317

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 19 05 2021
revised: 10 06 2021
accepted: 11 06 2021
entrez: 2 7 2021
pubmed: 3 7 2021
medline: 3 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Recently, recombinant monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) of three Ig isotypes (IgG, IgA, and IgM) sharing the same anti-spike protein Fab region were developed; we evaluated their neutralizing abilities using a pseudo-typed lentivirus coated with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and ACE2-transfected Crandell-Rees feline kidney cells as the host cell line. Although each of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs was able to neutralize the spike-coated lentiviruses, IgM and IgA neutralized the viral particles at 225-fold and 125-fold lower concentrations, respectively, than that of IgG. Our finding that the neutralization ability of Igs with the same Fab domain was dramatically higher for IgM and IgA than IgG mAbs suggests a strategy for developing effective and affordable antibody therapies for COVID-19. The efficient neutralization conferred by IgM and IgA mAbs can be explained by their capacity to bind multiple virions. While several IgG mAbs have been approved as therapeutics by the FDA, there are currently no IgM or IgA mAbs available. We suggest that mAbs with multiple antigen-binding sites such as IgM and IgA could be developed as the new generation of therapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34199224
pii: pathogens10060751
doi: 10.3390/pathogens10060751
pmc: PMC8231813
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Nature. 2020 Jul;583(7815):290-295
pubmed: 32422645
J Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 15;223(12):2020-2028
pubmed: 34043806
Front Immunol. 2019 Mar 22;10:529
pubmed: 30967868
Science. 2020 Dec 4;370(6521):1227-1230
pubmed: 33115920
Pathogens. 2021 Feb 02;10(2):
pubmed: 33540924
Transfusion. 2012 May;52 Suppl 1:65S-79S
pubmed: 22578374
Pharmacol Rep. 2020 Dec;72(6):1542-1552
pubmed: 33108587
Cell. 2020 Apr 16;181(2):271-280.e8
pubmed: 32142651
Nature. 2020 Jul;583(7816):459-468
pubmed: 32353859
Biosaf Health. 2020 Dec;2(4):226-231
pubmed: 32864605
Nat Med. 2020 Nov;26(11):1708-1713
pubmed: 32934372
Cell. 2020 Jul 9;182(1):73-84.e16
pubmed: 32425270
Nat Rev Immunol. 2021 Jun;21(6):382-393
pubmed: 33875867
Nat Commun. 2020 May 4;11(1):2251
pubmed: 32366817
Sci Transl Med. 2021 Jan 20;13(577):
pubmed: 33288661
Immunol Invest. 2020 Sep 18;:1-13
pubmed: 32945214
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7819):115-119
pubmed: 32454513
Antibodies (Basel). 2020 Oct 13;9(4):
pubmed: 33066119
Pathogens. 2020 Mar 03;9(3):
pubmed: 32138199
ACS Chem Biol. 2016 Jul 15;11(7):1852-61
pubmed: 27128252
MAbs. 2012 May-Jun;4(3):403-12
pubmed: 22531443
J Virol. 2008 Feb;82(4):1899-907
pubmed: 18077725

Auteurs

Yalcin Pisil (Y)

Laboratory of Primate Model, Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Institute for Frontier Life and Medical Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615-8530, Japan.

Zafer Yazici (Z)

Department of Virology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 19 Mayis University, Samsun 55270, Turkey.

Hisatoshi Shida (H)

Division of Molecular Virology, Institute of Immunological Science, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 060-0808, Japan.

Tomoyuki Miura (T)

Laboratory of Primate Model, Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Institute for Frontier Life and Medical Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615-8530, Japan.

Classifications MeSH