Electrically Triggered Drug Delivery from Novel Electrospun Poly(Lactic Acid)/Graphene Oxide/Quercetin Fibrous Scaffolds for Wound Dressing Applications.
antimicrobial activity
electrically drug delivery
electrospinning
graphene oxide
personalize medicine
polylactic acid
quercetin
Journal
Pharmaceutics
ISSN: 1999-4923
Titre abrégé: Pharmaceutics
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101534003
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Jun 2021
25 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
14
04
2021
revised:
10
06
2021
accepted:
17
06
2021
entrez:
2
7
2021
pubmed:
3
7
2021
medline:
3
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The novel controlled and localized delivery of drug molecules to target tissues using an external electric stimulus makes electro-responsive drug delivery systems both feasible and desirable, as well as entailing a reduction in the side effects. Novel micro-scaffold matrices were designed based on poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and graphene oxide (GO) via electrospinning. Quercetin (Q), a natural flavonoid, was loaded into the fiber matrices in order to investigate the potential as a model drug for wound dressing applications. The physico-chemical properties, electrical triggering capacity, antimicrobial assay and biocompatibility were also investigated. The newly fabricated PLA/GO/Q scaffolds showed uniform and smooth surface morphologies, without any beads, and with diameters ranging from 1107 nm (10%PLA/0.1GO/Q) to 1243 nm (10%PLA). The in vitro release tests of Q from the scaffolds showed that Q can be released much faster (up to 8640 times) when an appropriate electric field is applied compared to traditional drug-release approaches. For instance, 10 s of electric stimulation is enough to ensure the full delivery of the loaded Q from the 10%PLA/1%GO/Q microfiber scaffold at both 10 Hz and at 50 Hz. The antimicrobial tests showed the inhibition of bacterial film growth. Certainly, these materials could be loaded with more potent agents for anti-cancer, anti-infection, and anti-osteoporotic therapies. The L929 fibroblast cells cultured on these scaffolds were distributed homogeneously on the scaffolds, and the highest viability value of 82.3% was obtained for the 10%PLA/0.5%GO/Q microfiber scaffold. Moreover, the addition of Q in the PLA/GO matrix stimulated the production of IL-6 at 24 h, which could be linked to an acute inflammatory response in the exposed fibroblast cells, as a potential effect of wound healing. As a general conclusion, these results demonstrate the possibility of developing graphene oxide-based supports for the electrically triggered delivery of biological active agents, with the delivery rate being externally controlled in order to ensure personalized release.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34201978
pii: pharmaceutics13070957
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13070957
pmc: PMC8309188
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : UEFISCDI
ID : 13PCCDI/ 2018
Références
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 Feb;114:104219
pubmed: 33302170
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020 Jun;111:110805
pubmed: 32279788
ACS Omega. 2020 Jun 18;5(25):15362-15369
pubmed: 32637810
Polymers (Basel). 2016 Aug 08;8(8):
pubmed: 30974562
Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(2):119-131
pubmed: 30931854
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017 Jan 15;97:106-112
pubmed: 27864063
Polymers (Basel). 2020 Sep 27;12(10):
pubmed: 32992514
Pol J Pharmacol. 1995 Nov-Dec;47(6):531-5
pubmed: 8868376
Polymers (Basel). 2019 Aug 29;11(9):
pubmed: 31470594
Nanoscale. 2018 May 31;10(21):10087-10093
pubmed: 29781009
Biomater Sci. 2018 Jul 24;6(8):2025-2053
pubmed: 29968869
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Jan;1838(1 Pt B):254-65
pubmed: 24001508
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016 Dec 15;107:367-392
pubmed: 27356150
Materials (Basel). 2015 Aug 11;8(8):5154-5193
pubmed: 28793497
Diabetes. 2013 Apr;62(4):1084-93
pubmed: 23172919
Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2015 May 5;16(3):035001
pubmed: 27877802
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2019 Apr;44(2):169-177
pubmed: 30328058
Materials (Basel). 2020 May 23;13(10):
pubmed: 32456196
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Jul 1;76:1196-1204
pubmed: 28482486
Int J Biol Macromol. 2015 Apr;75:521-9
pubmed: 25701491
Int J Nanomedicine. 2018 Oct 05;13:6059-6071
pubmed: 30323593
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 26;10(1):20623
pubmed: 33244088
ACS Nano. 2014 Feb 25;8(2):1834-43
pubmed: 24428340
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017 Mar 13;3(3):471-486
pubmed: 33465942
Int J Biol Macromol. 2017 Dec;105(Pt 1):1148-1160
pubmed: 28751051
Polymers (Basel). 2020 Jun 22;12(6):
pubmed: 32580366
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 May 30;55(6):
pubmed: 31151305
Life Sci. 2020 Sep 15;257:118062
pubmed: 32652138
ACS Omega. 2019 Sep 03;4(12):14947-14954
pubmed: 31552335
J Mater Chem B. 2016 Feb 14;4(6):1134-1141
pubmed: 32263006
Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46(sup3):S28-S37
pubmed: 30183379
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016 Dec 15;107:206-212
pubmed: 27125190
Nanoscale. 2018 May 24;10(20):9547-9560
pubmed: 29745944
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2018 Apr;106(4):1051-1060
pubmed: 29218826
Int J Biol Macromol. 2020 Oct 15;161:1040-1054
pubmed: 32544577
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015 Apr 15;7(14):7644-52
pubmed: 25798788
Adv Mater. 2016 Oct;28(39):8749-8754
pubmed: 27545588
Biomacromolecules. 2011 Apr 11;12(4):1250-8
pubmed: 21344847
Materials (Basel). 2020 Apr 04;13(7):
pubmed: 32260385
Macromol Biosci. 2019 Feb;19(2):e1800256
pubmed: 30485660