Active Aging Governance and Challenges at the Local Level.

active aging governance local policies older people healthy life stakeholders

Journal

Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2308-3417
Titre abrégé: Geriatrics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101704019

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 22 04 2021
revised: 15 06 2021
accepted: 22 06 2021
entrez: 2 7 2021
pubmed: 3 7 2021
medline: 3 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

International and national guidelines have been promoting active aging while creating the necessary means for decision-makers and other relevant actors to work together (governance mechanisms) to implement local and active aging policies. This is especially important in the present COVID-19 pandemic context, posing greater challenges on older people who tend to be self-isolated. How are local actors conceptualizing active aging? What are their priorities related to a healthy life for older people? Which governance mechanisms are used to implement such policies? These are some of the questions addressed in this paper, targeting Portugal, a southern European country. A mixed-methods sequential explanatory design combining a survey conducted at a national level and interviews with key actors in the NUTS III Aveiro Region was employed to identify and understand the underpinning governance mechanisms. Findings confirm the 'passive organization type' in which European politico-territorial studies tend to place Portugal, as there are gaps in the way policies are formulated, implemented and evaluated, as well as a lack of coordination. Results of this study have important impacts on the way local governments and other stakeholders will prepare themselves in the post-pandemic period to design and implement policies addressing active aging.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34202217
pii: geriatrics6030064
doi: 10.3390/geriatrics6030064
pmc: PMC8293173
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 12;16(24):
pubmed: 31842329
Lancet. 2009 Oct 3;374(9696):1196-208
pubmed: 19801098
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jul-Oct;32(4-5):297-309
pubmed: 32583751
Eur J Ageing. 2017 Feb 10;14(3):295-310
pubmed: 28936139
Aging Ment Health. 2015;19(11):1031-41
pubmed: 25584744
Geriatrics (Basel). 2020 Apr 26;5(2):
pubmed: 32357582
J Aging Soc Policy. 2014;26(1-2):131-46
pubmed: 24224719
Acta Med Port. 2017 Jun 30;30(6):463-471
pubmed: 28898613
J Aging Soc Policy. 2014;26(1-2):166-80
pubmed: 24224800
Acta Med Port. 2018 Feb 28;31(2):80-93
pubmed: 29596767
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 15;14(9):
pubmed: 28914780
Psicothema. 2010 Nov;22(4):641-7
pubmed: 21044491
Int J Integr Care. 2010 Apr 12;10:e041
pubmed: 20428457
J Transp Health. 2015 Mar;2(1):50-57
pubmed: 27104147
N Engl J Med. 2003 Sep 11;349(11):1048-55
pubmed: 12968089

Auteurs

Alexandre Fernandes (A)

GOVCOPP, Department of Social, Political and Territorial Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.

Teresa Forte (T)

GOVCOPP, Department of Social, Political and Territorial Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.

Gonçalo Santinha (G)

GOVCOPP, Department of Social, Political and Territorial Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.

Sara Diogo (S)

CIPES, Research Center on Higher Education Studies, 4450-227 Matosinhos, Portugal.

Fernando Alves (F)

CITTA, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.

Classifications MeSH