Main Uncertainties in the RF Ultrasound Scanning Simulation of the Standard Ultrasound Phantoms.
echoscopy simulation
image contrast
phased array
point spread function
radio-frequency ultrasound
resolution phantom
Journal
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jun 2021
28 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
20
05
2021
revised:
23
06
2021
accepted:
25
06
2021
entrez:
2
7
2021
pubmed:
3
7
2021
medline:
7
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ultrasound echoscopy technologies are continuously evolving towards new modalities including quantitative parameter imaging, elastography, 3D scanning, and others. The development and analysis of new methods and algorithms require an adequate digital simulation of radiofrequency (RF) signal transformations. The purpose of this paper is the quantitative evaluation of RF signal simulation uncertainties in resolution and contrast reproduction with the model of a phased array transducer. The method is based on three types of standard physical phantoms. Digital 3D models of those phantoms are composed of point scatterers representing the weak backscattering of the background material and stronger backscattering from inclusions. The simulation results of echoscopy with sector scanning transducer by Field II software are compared with the RF output of the Ultrasonix scanner after scanning standard phantoms with 2.5 MHz phased array. The quantitative comparison of axial, lateral, and elevation resolutions have shown uncertainties from 9 to 22% correspondingly. The echoscopy simulation with two densities of scatterers is compared with contrast phantom imaging on the backscattered RF signals and B-scan reconstructed image, showing that the main sources of uncertainties limiting the echoscopy RF signal simulation adequacy are an insufficient knowledge of the scanner and phantom's parameters. The attempt made for the quantitative evaluation of simulation uncertainties shows both problems and the potential of echoscopy simulation in imaging technology developments. The analysis presented could be interesting for researchers developing quantitative ultrasound imaging and elastography technologies looking for simulated raw RF signals comparable to those obtained from real ultrasonic scanning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34203320
pii: s21134420
doi: 10.3390/s21134420
pmc: PMC8271890
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Research Council of Lithuania in the frame of Researchers group project
ID : S-MIP-19-8
Références
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2012 Aug;59(8):1664-73
pubmed: 22899114
J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Sep;38(9):2315-2327
pubmed: 30609066
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009 Oct;56(10):2167-79
pubmed: 19942504
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2003 Jan;50(1):40-57
pubmed: 12578135
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2015 Nov;62(11):1979-93
pubmed: 26559627
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2018 Mar;65(3):316-326
pubmed: 29505403
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2016 Mar;63(3):381-93
pubmed: 26886980
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Mar;37(3):767-780
pubmed: 29533894
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018 Jan;65(1):15-20
pubmed: 28368803
Ultrasonics. 2012 Jul;52(5):573-7
pubmed: 22348943
Radiology. 1991 Jul;180(1):286-8
pubmed: 2052713
Ultrasonics. 2017 Apr;76:10-18
pubmed: 28033498
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Aug;130(2):737-43
pubmed: 21877789
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1992;39(2):262-7
pubmed: 18263145
J Ultrasound Med. 1999 Sep;18(9):615-31
pubmed: 10478971
J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Jan;89(1):182-90
pubmed: 2002167
Ultrason Imaging. 1988 Apr;10(2):81-9
pubmed: 3057714
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2016 Nov;63(11):1922-1934
pubmed: 27824568
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2017 Oct;64(10):1625-1636
pubmed: 28644804
J Clin Ultrasound. 1981 Sep;9(7):365-75
pubmed: 6792235
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 Aug;37(8):1314-26
pubmed: 21683510
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013 May;94(5):487-95
pubmed: 23619292
Ultrasonics. 2003 Aug;41(6):415-9
pubmed: 12853077
Ultrason Imaging. 2017 Sep;39(5):263-282
pubmed: 28797220
Med Phys. 2012 Jan;39(1):246-56
pubmed: 22225294
Theranostics. 2017 Mar 7;7(5):1303-1329
pubmed: 28435467
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009 Feb;56(2):404-9
pubmed: 19251529
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2016 Feb;63(2):336-51
pubmed: 26761606
J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:8154780
pubmed: 29312656
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:2159-62
pubmed: 18002416
Ultrasonics. 2018 Sep;89:34-45
pubmed: 29723842
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2020 Jan;67(1):81-91
pubmed: 31535990
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Mar;19(2):298-304
pubmed: 29336119
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Jul;34(7):1436-1451
pubmed: 25643402
Ultrasonics. 2010 Mar;50(3):373-86
pubmed: 19837445