Context-Specific Habituation: A Review.
associative learning
evolution
habituation model
plasticity
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Jun 2021
12 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
05
05
2021
revised:
05
06
2021
accepted:
10
06
2021
entrez:
2
7
2021
pubmed:
3
7
2021
medline:
3
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Habituation consists of the progressive response decrement to a repeated stimulation, a response decline that is not accounted for by sensory or motor fatigue. Together with sensitization, habituation has been traditionally considered to be a prototypical example of non-associative learning, being affected only by the features of the stimulation, as for instance its intensity or frequency. However, despite this widespread belief, evidence exists showing that habituation can be specific to the context of the stimulation, thus suggesting that habituation can have an associative nature. Such an unexpected characteristic of habituation was in fact predicted by a theoretical model of associative learning proposed by Wagner in a series of works that appeared in the late 1970s. Here, we critically review the experimental data that since then have been accumulated in support of this hypothesis. What emerges from the literature is that context-specific habituation is common to several animal species and that the ability to form an association between the habituating stimulus and its context is independent of the complexity of the animal's nervous system. Finally, context-specific habituation is observed for a variety of organism's responses, ranging from visceral to motor and mental activities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34204791
pii: ani11061767
doi: 10.3390/ani11061767
pmc: PMC8231551
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Références
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1992 Nov;45(4):327-47
pubmed: 1475403
Front Integr Neurosci. 2014 Jan 09;7:103
pubmed: 24409126
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 May 15;286(1902):20190435
pubmed: 31088269
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 15;10:504
pubmed: 30930815
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2020 Jul;46(3):327-340
pubmed: 32730085
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2004 Sep;82(2):99-108
pubmed: 15341795
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000 Sep;74(2):119-34
pubmed: 10933898
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1974 Dec;87(6):1157-64
pubmed: 4443453
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1977 Jan;3(1):1-13
pubmed: 845541
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1981 Oct;7(4):313-33
pubmed: 7288367
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009 Sep;92(2):127-34
pubmed: 18703156
Science. 1972 Jan 28;175(4020):451-4
pubmed: 17731371
Biol Lett. 2019 Jul 26;15(7):20190104
pubmed: 31266419
Curr Biol. 2019 Apr 22;29(8):1337-1345.e4
pubmed: 30955936
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Jun;25(3):1028-1034
pubmed: 28547537
Biol Psychol. 1989 Oct;29(2):181-91
pubmed: 2627561
Psychol Rev. 2009 Apr;116(2):384-407
pubmed: 19348547
Behav Neurosci. 2017 Oct;131(5):437-46
pubmed: 28805430
Bioessays. 2019 Sep;41(9):e1900077
pubmed: 31429094
Psychol Rev. 1970 Sep;77(5):419-50
pubmed: 4319167
Psychol Rev. 1966 Jan;73(1):16-43
pubmed: 5324565
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000 Jul;26(3):323-39
pubmed: 10913996
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009 Sep;92(2):135-8
pubmed: 18854219
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1959 Aug;52:415-9
pubmed: 14418647
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2017 Jan;43(1):48-61
pubmed: 28045294
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Feb;72(2):346-374
pubmed: 29741452
Annu Rev Physiol. 1963;25:545-80
pubmed: 13977960
Behav Res Ther. 1987;25(2):81-97
pubmed: 3593171
Genes Brain Behav. 2013 Mar;12(2):210-23
pubmed: 23013276
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1995 Oct;52(2):385-95
pubmed: 8577806
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1999 Jan;71(1):34-49
pubmed: 9889071
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1970 Aug;72(2):177-92
pubmed: 5489452
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1996 Jul;54(3):611-7
pubmed: 8743637
Behav Neurosci. 2000 Jun;114(3):496-505
pubmed: 10883800
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2020 Jul;46(3):341-353
pubmed: 32730086