The Influence of Stimuli Valence and Arousal on Spatio-Temporal Representation of a Route.

arousal emotions route representation spatial memory valence

Journal

Brain sciences
ISSN: 2076-3425
Titre abrégé: Brain Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101598646

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 17 05 2021
revised: 15 06 2021
accepted: 17 06 2021
entrez: 2 7 2021
pubmed: 3 7 2021
medline: 3 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study assesses the influence of valence and arousal of element/landmarks along a route on the spatio-temporal representation of the route itself. Participants watched a movie of a virtual route containing landmarks with high arousal and positive (HP) or negative valence (HN), or landmarks with low arousal and positive (LP) or negative valence (LN). Afterwards, they had to (a) imagine walking distances between landmarks, (b) indicate the position of the landmarks along the route, (c) judge the spatial and temporal length of the route, and (d) draw the route. Results showed that the tasks were differentially influenced by the valence and arousal levels. Specifically, participants were more accurate in representing distances between positive, rather than negative, landmarks and in localizing positive high arousing landmarks. Moreover, the high arousing landmarks improved performance at the route drawing task. Finally, participants in the negative and low arousing conditions judged the route as being metrically and temporally longer than participants in positive and high arousing conditions. These results are interpreted in the light of theories about the effects of emotions on memory processes and the "feelings-as-information" theory. In brief, the results support the idea that representations of a route reflect a combination of cognitive and emotional processes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34205340
pii: brainsci11060814
doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060814
pmc: PMC8235279
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716
pubmed: 26315443
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):151-77
pubmed: 25673320
Br J Clin Psychol. 1992 Sep;31(3):301-6
pubmed: 1393159
Cogn Process. 2013 Aug;14(3):309-16
pubmed: 23536003
Front Psychol. 2017 May 10;8:763
pubmed: 28539910
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2019 Jun 30;15(2):155-168
pubmed: 32665801
Cogn Emot. 2016 Aug;30(5):925-38
pubmed: 25947579
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2004 Jun;10(2):75-88
pubmed: 15222802
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60
pubmed: 19897823
Emotion. 2011 Dec;11(6):1305-13
pubmed: 22142208
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):1083-1095
pubmed: 29663133
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Mar 2;101(9):3310-5
pubmed: 14981255
J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1962 Sep;65:145-53
pubmed: 13880271
Percept Psychophys. 1997 Aug;59(6):972-82
pubmed: 9270369
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Mar;6(2):114-33
pubmed: 21660127
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Jan;26(1):154-64
pubmed: 23984944
J Mem Lang. 2008 Feb;58(2):449-464
pubmed: 19190722
Psychol Bull. 2016 Aug;142(8):831-864
pubmed: 26963369
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Mar;100(2):431-49
pubmed: 25314367
Psychol Rev. 1999 Jul;106(3):529-50
pubmed: 10467897
Emotion. 2010 Dec;10(6):908-14
pubmed: 21171761
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52616
pubmed: 23300724
Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):300-19
pubmed: 12934688
Brain Sci. 2020 Jan 21;10(2):
pubmed: 31972964
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Sep;2(9):637-644
pubmed: 31346273
Cogn Emot. 2019 Mar;33(2):185-196
pubmed: 29409387
J Cogn. 2019 Jul 19;2(1):16
pubmed: 31517234
Perception. 2010;39(7):953-69
pubmed: 20842972
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 31;7(1):14396
pubmed: 29089542
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Oct;214(4):587-95
pubmed: 21912930
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Apr;18(4):614-25
pubmed: 16768364
J Abnorm Psychol. 2006 Aug;115(3):467-473
pubmed: 16866587
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(5):847-62
pubmed: 22296278
Mem Cognit. 2008 Jun;36(4):849-62
pubmed: 18604966
Psychol Bull. 2018 Dec;144(12):1325-1346
pubmed: 30321017
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2018 Feb;148:11-19
pubmed: 29289675
Cognition. 2015 Oct;143:193-202
pubmed: 26188683
Brain Sci. 2020 May 27;10(6):
pubmed: 32471259
Cogn Psychol. 1982 Oct;14(4):560-89
pubmed: 7140211
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Sep;24(9):687-690
pubmed: 32593502
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Jan;36(1):479-501
pubmed: 21889953
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 19;10:2587
pubmed: 31803120
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):634-648
pubmed: 31748933
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Feb;139(2):382-9
pubmed: 22192440
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):827-32
pubmed: 21861201
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Mar 19;99(6):4115-20
pubmed: 11904454
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Mar;136(3):354-62
pubmed: 21276583
Behav Processes. 2011 Jan;86(1):88-93
pubmed: 20971168
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2012 Dec;10(4):463-70
pubmed: 23250027
Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Jul 8;27(13):741-52
pubmed: 16096226
Psychol Rev. 2019 Jul;126(4):455-485
pubmed: 30973247
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998 Sep;4(5):523-6
pubmed: 9745242

Auteurs

Francesco Ruotolo (F)

CogScIVR, Department of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 81100 Caserta, Italy.
Helmholtz Institute, Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Filomena L Sbordone (FL)

CogScIVR, Department of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 81100 Caserta, Italy.

Ineke J M van der Ham (IJM)

Department of Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH