Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microimaging for the Qualitative Assessment of Root Canal Treatment: An Ex Vivo Preliminary Study.
MRI multi-parametric maps
cone beam computed tomography
endodontic treatment
magnetic resonance imaging
tooth micro-imaging
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jun 2021
01 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
08
04
2021
revised:
27
05
2021
accepted:
30
05
2021
entrez:
2
7
2021
pubmed:
3
7
2021
medline:
3
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To assess the potential ability of nuclear magnetic resonance micro-imaging (mMRI) to visualize and identify soft tissue debris and unfilled spaces inside radicular canals in endodontic treated extracted teeth, for understanding the causes of treatment failure. Toward this goal, multi-parametric mMRI and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) were compared. A non-recoverable root treated human tooth was extracted due to endodontic failure and excessive mobility. It was examined with both CBCT and mMRI: CBCT was performed with 0.125 mm voxel size (GXCB-500, Kavo-Gendex, Brea, CA, USA) and mMRI was performed with a spectrometer operating at 9.4T magnetic field (Bruker Avance-400, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). The mMRI images were obtained with a microimaging probe. Relaxation times (T1 and T2) and diffusion-weighted acquisition sequences were used to obtain multi-parametric maps of the extracted tooth (slice thickness of 200 µm and in plane resolution of 30 × 30 µm T1 and T2 maps identified unfilled spaces around and close to Gutta-percha cones instead of CBCT images that were not able to highlight this aspect. T1, T2 and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) assumed different values in dentine and in voids, characterized by different dimensions. Moreover, they were able to discriminate between infiltrations of water only and deposits of biological material. Because Gutta-percha cones are constituted of hard, non-porous material, they do not provide a signal and in mMRI images appear as zones of noise. Unlike the CBCT exam, mMRI can detect soft tissue debris and unfilled spaces inside radicular canals. Therefore, this in vitro study showed the potential of mMRI to evaluate the quality of the root canal treatment, suggesting its potential benefit in determining the causes of endodontic failure, without the use of ionizing radiation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34205946
pii: diagnostics11061012
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11061012
pmc: PMC8228494
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Eur Radiol. 2010 Nov;20(11):2637-55
pubmed: 20544352
J Endod. 2014 Feb;40(2):271-6
pubmed: 24461417
MAGMA. 2009 Dec;22(6):365-74
pubmed: 19924456
J Endod. 2011 Apr;37(4):517-21
pubmed: 21419301
Magn Reson Med. 2014 Jul;72(1):160-5
pubmed: 23900995
Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1718:135-147
pubmed: 29341007
Eur J Dent. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):136-143
pubmed: 29657539
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Oct 7;55(19):5767-85
pubmed: 20844335
J Endod. 2019 Jun;45(6):750-755.e2
pubmed: 31056300
J Endod. 2002 Dec;28(12):834-6
pubmed: 12489654
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 Mar;36 Suppl 1:S30-41
pubmed: 19104805
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Oct;10(10):ZE14-ZE19
pubmed: 27891491
J Endod. 2018 Apr;44(4):536-542
pubmed: 29426642
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2010 Sep;41(3):127-132
pubmed: 31051865
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:948610
pubmed: 25861652
Phys Rev Lett. 2016 Feb 26;116(8):087601
pubmed: 26967442
J Endod. 2011 Jun;37(6):745-52
pubmed: 21787482
Int Endod J. 2006 Dec;39(12):921-30
pubmed: 17180780
J Endod. 1992 May;18(5):237-44
pubmed: 1402579
Skeletal Radiol. 2008 Feb;37(2):95-7
pubmed: 18034342
J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018 Mar;12(3):750-761
pubmed: 28593731
Radiol Oncol. 2012 Mar;46(1):1-7
pubmed: 22933973
Oral Radiol. 2018 Jan;34(1):10-16
pubmed: 30484095
NMR Biomed. 1995 Nov-Dec;8(7-8):333-44
pubmed: 8739270
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020 Jan;49(1):20190183
pubmed: 31530016
J Endod. 2011 Nov;37(11):1516-9
pubmed: 22000454
Eur Radiol. 2011 Dec;21(12):2575-83
pubmed: 21805369
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2013 Oct;25 Suppl 1:S51-4
pubmed: 24046055