Influence of the Printing Angle and Load Direction on Flexure Strength in 3D Printed Materials for Provisional Dental Restorations.

3D printing flexure strength load direction printing angle provisional dental restorations

Journal

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 20 05 2021
revised: 12 06 2021
accepted: 14 06 2021
entrez: 2 7 2021
pubmed: 3 7 2021
medline: 3 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The CAD/CAM techniques, especially additive manufacturing such as 3D printing, constitute an ever-growing part of obtaining different dental appliances and restorations. Of these, provisional restorations are of frequent use in daily dental practice and are the object of this study. Masticatory and parafunctional forces determine flexure on these prostheses. This study investigates the influence of the printing angle and loading direction of the applied force on the flexure strength of two commercially available printable resins-Detax Freeprint Temp and Nextdent MFH Vertex dental. Ten rectangular beam specimens printed at the angle of 0, 45 and 90 degrees were fabricated of each of these materials, with an addition of 10 at 0 degrees for the investigation of the load direction. Three-point bending tests were performed in a universal testing machine. Flexure strength, strain at break and Young's modulus were determined and a statistical analysis was performed on the obtained data. According to the statistical analysis, the flexural strength has a significance dependence with respect to degrees of orientation, for both investigated materials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34207167
pii: ma14123376
doi: 10.3390/ma14123376
pmc: PMC8233949
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
ID : 857124

Références

J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Oct;124(4):468-475
pubmed: 31810611
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Aug;10(8):ZC72-7
pubmed: 27656568
Materials (Basel). 2019 Mar 15;12(6):
pubmed: 30875894
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Oct-Dec;16(4):328-334
pubmed: 27746595
Dent Mater. 2018 Dec;34(12):e324-e333
pubmed: 30293688
J Oral Rehabil. 2013 Jan;40(1):2-4
pubmed: 23121262
Polymers (Basel). 2019 Nov 09;11(11):
pubmed: 31717539
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Jun;115(6):760-7
pubmed: 26803175
Dent Mater. 2019 Dec;35(12):1805-1812
pubmed: 31727446
J Med Life. 2019 Jan-Mar;12(1):43-48
pubmed: 31123524
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Sep;124(3):387-394
pubmed: 31784192
Dent Mater. 2018 Feb;34(2):192-200
pubmed: 29110921
Dent Mater. 2021 Feb;37(2):336-350
pubmed: 33353734

Auteurs

Paula Derban (P)

Department of Prosthetic Restorations on Implants, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Victor Babes of Timisoara, Blv. Revoluţiei, Nr. 9, 300041 Timişoara, Romania.

Romeo Negrea (R)

Department of Mathematics, University Politehnica of Timisoara, Pta. Victoriei, Nr. 2, 300006 Timisoara, Romania.

Mihai Rominu (M)

Department of Prosthesis Technology and Dental Materials, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Victor Babes of Timisoara, Blv. Revoluţiei, Nr. 9, 300041 Timişoara, Romania.

Liviu Marsavina (L)

Department of Mechanics and Strength of Materials, University Politehnica of Timisoara, Mihai Viteazu Avenue, Nr. 1, 300222 Timisoara, Romania.

Classifications MeSH