The Effectiveness of Transversus Abdominis Plane and Quadratus Lumborum Blocks in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Cesarean Section-A Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Trial.
analgesia
cesarean section
pain
quadratus abdominis block
transverse abdominis plane block
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 06 2021
30 06 2021
Historique:
received:
28
05
2021
revised:
26
06
2021
accepted:
28
06
2021
entrez:
2
7
2021
pubmed:
3
7
2021
medline:
3
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Acute pain intensity related to cesarean section (CS) may be extensive and is often underestimated. This may influence mothers' quality of life and their children's development. Regional analgesia techniques that include transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) have proven their efficacy in the postoperative period after CS. Although several randomized controlled studies and one meta-analysis have investigated the utility of TAPB and QLB in the reduction of acute and chronic pain after CS, only one study directly compared both types of regional blocks and revealed superiority of QLB over TAPB. Our study aimed to reevaluate the effectiveness of transversus TAPB and QLB in controlling acute postoperative pain after CS. We recruited 197 women with singleton pregnancies undergoing CS under spinal anesthesia. The patients were randomized to receive either TAPB or QLB after CS. The acute postoperative pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after the operation. No significant difference in acute postoperative pain intensity between the groups was found. The patients who received TAPB had a higher demand for supplemental morphine injections (
Identifiants
pubmed: 34209465
pii: ijerph18137034
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137034
pmc: PMC8296943
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Analgesics, Opioid
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348
pubmed: 30322584
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Nov/Dec;41(6):757-762
pubmed: 27755488
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Nov;103(5):726-30
pubmed: 19700776
Anaesthesia. 2019 Feb;74(2):167-173
pubmed: 30383289
Eur J Pain. 2015 Aug;19(7):929-39
pubmed: 25413847
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2019;51(4):257-261
pubmed: 31550870
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2016 Dec;28:45-60
pubmed: 27717634
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Nov;32(11):812-8
pubmed: 26225500
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Oct;29(5):638-43
pubmed: 27429253
Anaesthesia. 2021 Mar;76(3):393-403
pubmed: 32621529
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2003 Nov;6(4):263-74
pubmed: 14628179
Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):706-12
pubmed: 21498494
Pain. 2008 Nov 15;140(1):87-94
pubmed: 18818022
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jan;75(1):89-95
pubmed: 31523801
Anesthesiology. 2013 Apr;118(4):934-44
pubmed: 23392233
J Paediatr Child Health. 2007 Apr;43(4):262-70
pubmed: 17444828
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jul 14;:
pubmed: 31308263
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;111(5):721-35
pubmed: 23811424
Anesth Analg. 2007 Jan;104(1):193-7
pubmed: 17179269
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018 Jun;31(3):262-267
pubmed: 29521684
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Feb 26;5:44
pubmed: 29536008
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2012 Jan;50(1):1-14
pubmed: 22148986
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 20;17(1):91
pubmed: 28320342
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2752876
pubmed: 28154824