Working Memory Load Effects on the Tilt Aftereffect.

attention tilt aftereffect visual adaptation visual load working memory

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 18 10 2020
accepted: 24 05 2021
entrez: 2 7 2021
pubmed: 3 7 2021
medline: 3 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Prolonged exposure to an oriented stimulus causes a subsequent test stimulus to be perceived as tilted in the opposite direction, a phenomenon referred to as the tilt aftereffect (TAE). Previous studies have demonstrated that high-level cognitive functions such as attention can modulate the TAE, which is generally well-known as a low-level perceptual process. However, it is unclear whether working memory load, another high-level cognitive function, could modulate the TAE. To address this issue, here we developed a new paradigm by combining a working memory load task with a TAE task. Participants firstly remembered a stream of digits (Experiment 1) or four color-shape conjunctions (Experiment 2) under high/low load conditions, and then recognized the probe stimuli (digits or a color-shape conjunction), which were presented at the center of an adapting grating. After the recognition task (i.e., the adaptation stage), participants performed an orientation judgment task to measure their TAEs. The result of Experiment 1, where the load stimuli were digits, showed that the magnitude of the TAEs were reduced under the condition of the high working memory load compared to that of the low working memory load. However, we failed to replicate the finding in Experiment 2, where the load stimuli were color-shape conjunctions. Together, our two experiments provided mixed evidence regarding the working memory load effects on the TAE and further replications are needed in future work.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34211415
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618712
pmc: PMC8239138
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

618712

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Mei, Cen, Luo, Qiu and Pan.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Percept Psychophys. 2000 Nov;62(8):1525-33
pubmed: 11140176
Vision Res. 2011 Oct 15;51(20):2169-75
pubmed: 21839107
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2015 Nov 1;1:547-567
pubmed: 26858985
Vision Res. 2009 Jun;49(10):1174-81
pubmed: 18834897
J Vis. 2004 May 20;4(6):434-44
pubmed: 15330711
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Dec;72(12):2848-2864
pubmed: 31268409
J Vis. 2011 May 20;11(5):
pubmed: 21602298
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Jun 13;5:57
pubmed: 21716633
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
pubmed: 19565683
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun;21(3):451-68
pubmed: 7790827
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 May;80(4):929-950
pubmed: 29363029
Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(9):937-49
pubmed: 11516446
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Aug;82(6):2814-2820
pubmed: 32557006
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2009 Jul;26(7):1553-63
pubmed: 19568290
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):860-9
pubmed: 21713369
Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):803-8
pubmed: 23558546
J Vis. 2013 Jul 31;13(8):
pubmed: 23902752
Br J Psychol. 2019 May;110(2):357-371
pubmed: 29943810
J Neurophysiol. 2007 May;97(5):3155-64
pubmed: 17344377
J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467+
pubmed: 5541744
Nature. 1970 Oct 3;228(5266):37-9
pubmed: 5456209
Science. 1971 Oct 15;174(4006):314-6
pubmed: 5119106
Psychophysiology. 2020 Nov;57(11):e13643
pubmed: 32725929
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Nov;44(11):1805-1814
pubmed: 30091633
Science. 1997 Nov 28;278(5343):1616-9
pubmed: 9374459
Mem Cognit. 2009 Sep;37(6):829-36
pubmed: 19679862
Neuron. 2005 Jan 6;45(1):169-75
pubmed: 15629711
Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81
pubmed: 9384378
Vision Res. 2011 Aug 15;51(16):1811-9
pubmed: 21704059
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 23;6:23567
pubmed: 27005949
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
pubmed: 9176953
Nature. 1990 Mar 1;344(6261):60-2
pubmed: 2304555
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Aug;39(4):919-24
pubmed: 23713796
Mem Cognit. 2019 Nov;47(8):1498-1514
pubmed: 31267436
Neural Netw. 2004 Jun-Jul;17(5-6):849-60
pubmed: 15288902
Neuron. 2007 Jul 19;55(2):313-23
pubmed: 17640531
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):339-54
pubmed: 15355143
Cogn Psychol. 2005 Aug;51(1):42-100
pubmed: 16039935
Vision Res. 1971 Aug;11(8):833-40
pubmed: 5094976
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Feb;20(1):163-70
pubmed: 23002024
J Cogn. 2019 Aug 08;2(1):36
pubmed: 31517246
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Jul;78(5):1488-95
pubmed: 27150617
Vision Res. 2007 Nov;47(25):3125-31
pubmed: 17936871
J Vis. 2009 Nov 18;9(12):12.1-10
pubmed: 20053103
Vision Res. 2012 Feb 15;55:47-51
pubmed: 22245710
Perception. 2014;43(6):549-68
pubmed: 25154287

Auteurs

Gaoxing Mei (G)

Department of Psychology, School of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China.

Mofen Cen (M)

Department of Psychology, School of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China.

Xu Luo (X)

Department of Psychology, School of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China.

Shiming Qiu (S)

Department of Psychology, School of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China.

Yun Pan (Y)

Department of Psychology, School of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China.

Classifications MeSH