Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Local Treatment in Oligometastatic Disease.
OMD
SABR
cancer
cost-effectiveness (economics)
radiation therapy (radiotherapy)
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
15
02
2021
accepted:
31
05
2021
entrez:
2
7
2021
pubmed:
3
7
2021
medline:
3
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In certain malignancies, patients with oligometastatic disease benefit from radical ablative or surgical treatment. The SABR-COMET trial demonstrated a survival benefit for oligometastatic patients randomized to local stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR) compared to patients receiving standard care (SC) alone. Our aim was to determine the cost-effectiveness of SABR. A decision model based on partitioned survival simulations estimated costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) associated with both strategies in a United States setting from a health care perspective. Analyses were performed over the trial duration of six years as well as a long-term horizon of 16 years. Model input parameters were based on the SABR-COMET trial data as well as best available and most recent data provided in the published literature. An annual discount of 3% for costs was implemented in the analysis. All costs were adjusted to 2019 US Dollars according to the United States Consumer Price Index. SABR costs were reported with an average of $11,700 per treatment. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Incremental costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set to $100,000/QALY. Based on increased overall and progression-free survival, the SABR group showed 0.78 incremental QALYs over the trial duration and 1.34 incremental QALYs over the long-term analysis. Treatment with SABR led to a marginal increase in costs compared to SC alone (SABR: $304,656; SC: $303,523 for 6 years; ICER $1,446/QALY and SABR: $402,888; SC: $350,708 for long-term analysis; ICER $38,874/QALY). Therapy with SABR remained cost-effective until treatment costs of $88,969 over the trial duration (i.e. 7.6 times the average cost). Sensitivity analysis identified a strong model impact for ongoing annual costs of oligo- and polymetastatic disease states. Our analysis suggests that local treatment with SABR adds QALYs for patients with certain oligometastatic cancers and represents an intermediate- and long-term cost-effective treatment strategy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In certain malignancies, patients with oligometastatic disease benefit from radical ablative or surgical treatment. The SABR-COMET trial demonstrated a survival benefit for oligometastatic patients randomized to local stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR) compared to patients receiving standard care (SC) alone. Our aim was to determine the cost-effectiveness of SABR.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
A decision model based on partitioned survival simulations estimated costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) associated with both strategies in a United States setting from a health care perspective. Analyses were performed over the trial duration of six years as well as a long-term horizon of 16 years. Model input parameters were based on the SABR-COMET trial data as well as best available and most recent data provided in the published literature. An annual discount of 3% for costs was implemented in the analysis. All costs were adjusted to 2019 US Dollars according to the United States Consumer Price Index. SABR costs were reported with an average of $11,700 per treatment. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Incremental costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set to $100,000/QALY.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Based on increased overall and progression-free survival, the SABR group showed 0.78 incremental QALYs over the trial duration and 1.34 incremental QALYs over the long-term analysis. Treatment with SABR led to a marginal increase in costs compared to SC alone (SABR: $304,656; SC: $303,523 for 6 years; ICER $1,446/QALY and SABR: $402,888; SC: $350,708 for long-term analysis; ICER $38,874/QALY). Therapy with SABR remained cost-effective until treatment costs of $88,969 over the trial duration (i.e. 7.6 times the average cost). Sensitivity analysis identified a strong model impact for ongoing annual costs of oligo- and polymetastatic disease states.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our analysis suggests that local treatment with SABR adds QALYs for patients with certain oligometastatic cancers and represents an intermediate- and long-term cost-effective treatment strategy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34211842
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.667993
pmc: PMC8239286
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
667993Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Mehrens, Unterrainer, Corradini, Niyazi, Manapov, Westphalen, Froelich, Wildgruber, Seidensticker, Ricke, Rübenthaler and Kunz.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep;11(9):549-57
pubmed: 24958182
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 17;8(4):e020690
pubmed: 29666135
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(31):e11736
pubmed: 30075584
Radiat Oncol. 2012 Oct 12;7:168
pubmed: 23062178
Int J Palliat Nurs. 1997 Sep 2;3(5):275-280
pubmed: 29324147
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 13;13(4):e0196007
pubmed: 29652926
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Apr 1;109(5):1176-1184
pubmed: 33309977
Br J Cancer. 2006 Sep 18;95(6):683-90
pubmed: 16967055
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 17;7(1):5571
pubmed: 28717246
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Oct;16(5):549-559
pubmed: 27574879
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Oct 21;6:84
pubmed: 18939982
Am J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct;34(5):494-8
pubmed: 20805737
J Thorac Oncol. 2013 Aug;8(8):997-1003
pubmed: 23787802
Nat Commun. 2018 May 4;9(1):1793
pubmed: 29728604
FEBS Lett. 1969 Mar;2 Suppl 1:S14-S21
pubmed: 11946359
Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov;41(11):1118-1124
pubmed: 29553972
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Feb;36(2):215-223
pubmed: 29043567
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jan 24;4(2):422-428
pubmed: 31011688
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Sep 12;16(1):179
pubmed: 30208899
Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1447828
pubmed: 29564962
Colorectal Dis. 2013 May;15(5):e215-22
pubmed: 23351057
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Dec 01;11:203
pubmed: 24289488
JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316(10):1093-103
pubmed: 27623463
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Mar 1;91(3):556-63
pubmed: 25680599
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Jun 1;107(2):253-256
pubmed: 32386735
Value Health. 2015 Sep;18(6):774-82
pubmed: 26409604
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jul;8(Suppl 6):S517-27
pubmed: 27606082
Value Health. 2015 Dec;18(8):1152-7
pubmed: 26686802
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Nov 13;9:1300
pubmed: 30483135
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Mar 1;6(3):409-412
pubmed: 31944219
Eur J Haematol. 2015 Sep;95(3):218-29
pubmed: 25354894
BMC Cancer. 2020 May 5;20(1):380
pubmed: 32370765
JAMA. 2016 Jan 19;315(3):272-83
pubmed: 26784775
BMC Cancer. 2019 Aug 19;19(1):816
pubmed: 31426760
Cancer. 2013 Sep 1;119(17):3123-32
pubmed: 23720093
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Apr 1;109(5):1185-1194
pubmed: 33002541
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Jul 15;95(4):1175-83
pubmed: 27130789
Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2018 Apr 2;4(2):
pubmed: 29610395
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Jul;148:157-166
pubmed: 32388150
Oncologist. 2019 Sep;24(9):1209-1218
pubmed: 30796156
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;38(25):2830-2838
pubmed: 32484754